Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:35:58.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sire-breed comparison of carcass composition of steers from Angus dams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. J. Bass
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
A. H. Carter
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
D. L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
R. L. Baker
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
K. R. Jones
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand

Summary

Body composition of 324 steers from Angus dams by ten different sire breeds was compared at constant age. Progeny of the large European breeds and the Friesian attained heavier fasted live weights and carcass weights than the local Angus and Hereford breeds. Friesian cross-breds had the lowest dressing percentage. The Blonde d'Aquitaine and Limousin crosses had the lightest bone weights and this was reflected in high meat yields. The European breeds had the leanest carcasses, the traditional beef breeds the heaviest subcutaneous fat weights and the dairy breeds the heaviest internal fat weights. The results are discussed in relation to overseas findings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, D. M. & Southgate, J. R. (1977). The evaluation of breeds for beef production. World Beview of Animal Production XIII, 3, 2936.Google Scholar
Baker, R. L. & Carter, A. H. (1979). Beef Cattle Exotic Breeds. Aglink FPP 81/9. Media Services, MAF, Box 2298, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Baker, R. L. & Carter, A. H. (1980). Exploitation of breed differences in sheep and beef cattle – Implications of experimental results with beef cattle in New Zealand. World Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding, Palmerston North, New Zealand (in the Press).Google Scholar
Barton, R. A. (1971). Growth and carcass characteristics of Angus, Beef Shorthorn, Milking Shorthorn, and Friesian Steers – Trial V. Sheepfarming Annual, 97104.Google Scholar
Barton, R. A. (1972). Beef steer breed comparisons – Trial VI. Sheepfarming Annual 5773.Google Scholar
Bass, J. J., Colomer-Rocher, F., Baker, R. L., Carter, A. H., Jarnet, M. P. & Woods, E. G. (1976). Carcass composition of purebred and cross-bred Angus steers. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 36, 198203.Google Scholar
Bech Anderson, B., Liboriussen, T., Thysen, I., Kousgaard, K. & Buchter, L. (1976). Crossbreeding experiment with beef and dual-purpose sire breeds on Danish dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 3, 227238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T. & Butterfield, R. M. (1976). New Concepts of Cattle Growth. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. & May, N. D. S. (1966). Muscles of the Ox. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Carter, A. H. (1970). The potential for increased farm efficiency from exotic breeds of sheep and cattle. Proceedings of the 20th Lincoln College Farmers Conference, pp. 108123.Google Scholar
Carter, A. H. (1972). Exotic beef breeds. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 125, 3, 5665.Google Scholar
Carter, A. H. (1975). Evaluation of cattle breeds for beef production in New Zealand: a review. Livestock Production Science 2, 327346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. H., Muller, J. P. E. & Baker, R. L. (1975). Exotic breeds for beef herds: preliminary results. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers Conference, pp. 1924.Google Scholar
Charles, D. D. & Johnson, E. R. (1976). Muscle weight distribution in four breeds of cattle with reference to individual muscles, anatomical groups and wholesale cuts. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 435443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, G. C. (1972). Lessons from the Charolais trials. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers Conference, pp. 7799.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. & Jury, K. E. (1964). Implantation of oestrogenic hormones in beef cattle. IV. Effects of oestradiol benzoate plus progesterone on carcass composition and a comparison of methods of carcass evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 158173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, G. C., Jury, K. E., Dalton, D. C. & Langridge, M. (1980). Beef production from the dairy herd. IV. Growth and carcass composition of straight-bred and beef-cross Friesian steers in several environments. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, D. R. (1977). Growth and carcass characteristics of steers sired by Friesian, Charolais and Hereford bulls in dairy cow herds. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 17, 533537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. R., Pryor, W. J. & Butterfield, R. M. (1973). Studies of fat distribution in the bovine carcass. II. Relationship of intramuscular fat to the quantitative analysis of the skeletal musculature. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 287296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jury, K. E., Everitt, G. C. & Dalton, C. C. (1980). Beef production from the dairy herd. V. Growth of steers and heifers in different environments to 600 days of age. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Smith, R. J. (1976). Variation in lean distribution among steer carcasses of different breed and crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 533542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Barton, R. A. & Rae, A. L. (1962). The efficiency of determining the chemical composition of lamb carcass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 381386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, R. M., Dikeman, M. E., Allen, D. M., May, M., Crouse, J. D. & Campion, D. R. (1976). Characterization of biological types of cattle. III. Carcass composition, quality and palatability. Journal of Animal Science 43, 4862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, I. L. (1971). Comparative beef performance of the large cattle breeds of Western Europe. Animal Breeding Abstracts 39, 129.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission (1979). Updated breed average weights. MLC Newsletter 36, 89.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. H. L., McKeown, D. W. & Saul, G. R. (1978). Breed and crossing effects on post-weaning growth rate of steers. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 12, 182.Google Scholar
Mukhoty, H. & Berg, R. T. (1973). Influence of breed and sex on muscle weight distribution of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 317326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J. A., Weiss, G. M. & Schrader, B. (1974). Comparisons of cross-bred calves by South Devon, Maine-Anjou and Simmental sires for some beef production traits. Canadian Journal Animal Science 54, 197203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1973). The effect of body weight loss on the composition of Brahman cross and Africander cross steers. II. Dissected components of the dressed carcass. Journal oj Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 411423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, T. & Lang, C. P. & Tulloh, N. M. (1976). A comparison of body composition and tissue distribution of Friesian and Angus steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vissac, B. (1976). Using large muscular breeds to improve world beef production. World Animal Review 19, 17.Google Scholar
Vissac, B., Foulley, J. L. & Menissier, F. (1980). Using breed resources of continental beef cattle. World Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding, Palmerston North, N.Z. (in the Press).Google Scholar