Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:44:46.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A simple model of pH in slurry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. G. Sommer  and
S. Husted
S. G. Sommer
Affiliation:
The Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Department of Soil Science, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 23, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
S. Husted
Affiliation:
The Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Department of Soil Science, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 23, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Ammonia volatilization from stored slurry or surface-applied slurry in the field is strongly affected by pH. Thus a simple, iterative model was developed to predict pH changes in slurry. Concentrations of NH4+/NH3, CO2/HCO3-/CO32- and volatile fatty acids were input data to the model. The model was validated by titrating 17 slurry samples collected from four cattle farms, seven pig farms and three biogas plants. Predictions of pH agreed well for 14 slurries with titration data in the pH interval from 4 to 10. Simulations indicated that microbial degradation of VFA to methane and carbon dioxide resulted in a pH increase if the carbon dioxide produced was lost to the atmosphere. There was little change in pH if the produced carbon dioxide dissolved in the slurry.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 124 , Issue 3 , June 1995 , pp. 447 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bril, J. & Salomons, W. (1990). Chemical composition of animal manure: a modelling approach. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgacakis, D., Sievers, D. M. & Iannotti, E. L. (1982). Buffer stability in manure digesters. Agricultural Wastes 4, 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, A. E., Clesceri, L. S. & Eaton, A. D. (1992). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. (1979). Chemical Equilibria in Soils. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Muck, R. E. & Steenhuis, T. S. (1982). Nitrogen losses from manure storages. Agricultural Wastes 4, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, J. E. & Sommer, S. G. (1993). Modelling effects of wind speed and surface cover on ammonia volatilization from stored pig slurry. Atmospheric Environment 21A, 2567–2574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J. W. & Beauchamp, E. G. (1989). Relationship between volatile fatty acids, total ammonia and pH in manure slurries. Biological Wastes 29, 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sas Institute (1988). SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Skoog, D. A. (1985). Principles of Instrumental Analysis, Third Edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Husted, S. (1995). The chemical buffer system in raw and digested animal slurry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 124, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J. & Cornforth, I. S. (1974). The effect of aeration on the gases produced by slurry during storage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25, 1249–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Molen, J., Beljaars, A. C. M., Chardon, W. J., Jury, W. A. & van Faassen, H. G. (1990). Ammonia volatilization from arable land after application of cattle slurry. 2. Derivation of a transfer model. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar