Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:44:54.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short-term undernutrition and prenatal mortality in young and mature Merino ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. J. Mackenzie  and
T. N. Edey
A. J. Mackenzie
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, Australia
T. N. Edey
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Prenatal mortality was examined in 74 primiparous Merino ewes which, after hand mating to fertile rams on the second oestrus following synchronization, were allocated to two groups. One group of 38 ewes was confined to yards and restricted to approximately 30% of their maintenance requirement for 14 days while the other group of 36 remained at pasture. The degree and timing of prenatal loss was assessed by corpora lutea counts, pregnancy diagnosis about day 40, returns to service and lambing records.

The mean ovulation rate was 1·06 and the 19-day non-return rate was 87·8%. Pregnancy failed in a higher proportion of the underfed ewes (45·0%) than in the control ewes (30·8%) but this difference did not reach significance. Of the ewes returning to service, significantly more did so with cycles longer than 19 days in the underfed group (9/12) than in the control group (2/8), indicating that in the latter stages, the treatment may have been detrimental to embryo survival.

In a second experiment, ovulation rate and prenatal mortality, assessed as in the first experiment, were studied in 85 mature Merino ewes subjected to the following nutritional treatments: HH, control; HL, 30% submaintenance feeding for 14 days following mating; LH, 15% submaintenance feeding for 7 days prior to mating; LL, both submaintenance treatments.

Acute undernutrition prior to mating (LH) had no effect on ovulation rate or prenatal mortality. Ovulation rates were low over all groups (mean 1·09) and thus precluded any valid examination of ovulation rate and body weight relationships. The right ovary was significantly more active in producing ova than the left in all groups (P < 0·05). Although ova wastage was apparently higher in. the post-mating undernutrition groups (HL, 44%; LL, 48%; LH, 50%) than in the control group (HH, 35%), the differences were not significant. An increased incidence of extended (> 19 days) first-return cycle lengths in group LL provided some evidence of induced prenatal mortality.

In so far as the experiments can be considered together, they indicate that if body weights are comparable, primiparous 1½-year-old ewes are not necessarily more susceptible than mature ewes to prenatal mortality induced by severe short-term undernutrition.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 113 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, A. J. (1968). The influence of liveweight on ovulation rate in ewes. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 28, 115–19.Google Scholar
Bennett, D., Axelsen, A. & Chapman, H. W. (1964). The effect of nutritional restriction during early pregnancy on numbers of lambs born. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 5, 70–2.Google Scholar
Bennett, D., Nadin, J. B. & Axelsen, A. (1970). The effect of undernutrition during early pregnancy in Merino ewes. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 8, 362–5.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. (1962). Liveweight-productivity relationships in sheep. 1. Liveweight and reproduction. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 249–64.Google Scholar
Cumming, I. A. (1972). The effect of nutritional restriction on embryonic survival during the first three weeks of pregnancy in the Perendale ewe. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9, 199–203.Google Scholar
Edey, T. N. (1966). Nutritional stress and pre-implantation embryonic mortality in Merino sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 67, 287–93.Google Scholar
Edey, T. N. (1967) Early embryonic death and subsequent cycle length in the ewe. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 13, 437–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edey, T. N. (1968). Bodyweight and ovulation rate in sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 7, 188–91.Google Scholar
Edey, T. N. (1969). Prenatal mortality in sheep: A review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 37, 173–90.Google Scholar
Edey, T. N. (1970a). Nutritional stress and preimplantation embryonic mortality in Merino sheep. 1965. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 181–6.Google Scholar
Edey, T. N. (1970b). Nutritional stress and preimplantation embryonic mortality in Merino sheep (1964–7). General discussion and conclusions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 199–204.Google Scholar
Edgab, D. G. (1962). Studies on infertility in ewes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 3, 60–4.Google Scholar
Guerra, J. C., Thwaites, C. J. & Edey, T. N. (1971). The effects of live weight on the ovarian response to pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin and on embryo mortality in the ewe. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 177–8.Google Scholar
Lamond, D. R. (1964). Synchronization of ovarian cycles in sheep and cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 32, 269–85.Google Scholar
Lamond, D. R. & Urquhart, E. J. (1961). Sheep laparotomy cradle. Australian Veterinary Journal 37, 430–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, A. J. (1973). Ovarian response and prenatal mortality in the nutritionally stressed ewe. M.Rur.Sc. Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Radford, H. M., Watson, R. H. & Wood, G. F. (1960). A crayon and associated harness for the detection of mating under field conditions. Australian Veterinary Journal 36, 57–66.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1957). Pregnancy. In Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals. Vol. III. Ed. Hammond, J.. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1961). The influence of liveweight and condition on ewe fertility. Proceedings of the Ruahura Farmers1 Conference Week, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
Wodzicka-Tomaszewska, M. & Welch, R. A. S. (1969). Observations on the fertility of the two tooth New Zealand Romney ewe. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 29, 194.Google Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Turner, H. N. & Dolling, C. H. S. (1963). Selection for fertility in Australian Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 460–82.Google Scholar