Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:05:07.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection for seedling vigour in Festuca arundinacea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. S. Faulkner
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Plant Breeding Station, Loughgall, Armagh, BT61 8JB
Fiona Johnston
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Plant Breeding Station, Loughgall, Armagh, BT61 8JB
D. M. P. McAneney
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Plant Breeding Station, Loughgall, Armagh, BT61 8JB

Summary

Two sets of experiments were carried out to compare methods of selecting Festuca arundinacea (tall fescue) for improved seedling vigour.

In the first, germination and seedling growth of four varieties (Goar, Lironde, S. 170, and ZW 42–6) were compared in hydroponic growth tanks. From each variety, groups of seedlings were selected for each of four vigour characters (speed of germination, leaf length, root length and speed of production of the second leaf) and a fifth group was selected at random as a control. Plants of each group were intercrossed in isolation and their progeny compared.

In the second, S. 170 was studied through two cycles of selection in a soil-based compost. In the first cycle, groups of seedlings were selected for each of five characters (speed of emergence, leaf length, and speed of production of the second leaf, first axillary tiller and coleoptile tiller). Two further groups were selected randomly. In the second cycle, the progeny of each group were reselected for the same character as their parents. Both first- and second-cycle progeny were compared among themselves.

Significant direct responses to selection were obtained in all characters except speed of germination in hydroponics. Indirect responses also occurred but were mostly smaller and in response to selection for a related character, e.g. selection for early tillering resulted in early second leaves and vice versa. Two cycles of selection raised the frequency of coleoptile tillers from about 5 to 55 %, but the concomitant advances in vigour characters were smaller than those achieved by direct selection. It is argued that for practical purposes the basic criterion in selecting for improved seedling vigour should be rapid attainment of a particular growth stage such as appearance of the first tiller. Since speed of emergence itself responded to selection, the attainment of such a stage should be related to date of sowing rather than of emergence or germination.

In the progeny of the hydroponic selections, all characters showed significant varietal differences, some of them the reverse of differences between the parent populations of the varieties. These results illustrated the importance of seed provenance as a determinant of seedling vigour, and suggest that choice of parent material is important in breeding for improved vigour.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnott, R. A. (1969). The effect of seed weight and depth of sowing on the emergence and early seedling growth of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Journal of the British Grassland Society 24, 104110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badoux, S. (1977). Breeding tall fescue (Festuca arundinacia Schreb.) and Cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) for seedling establishment under conditions of competition. Proceedings of the 12th International Grassland Congress, Leipzig, pp. 411414.Google Scholar
Bean, E. W. (1973). Seed quality: its variation, control and importance in breeding and varietal assessment. Report of the Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1972, pp. 194208.Google Scholar
Bean, E. W. (1974). The development and quality of forage grass seeds produced under different isolation conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 78, 179186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, J. L. (1973). Effect of sowing depth and postsowing compaction on the establishment of tall fescue varieties. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1, 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, A. H. (1965). Interaction of grass, clover and nurse crop in the seedling year. Journal of the British Grassland Society 20, 241247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, B. N. (1961). Analysis of ectotypic differences in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Annals of Applied Biology 49, 560562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, G. A., Morris, J. A. & Robertson, A. (1957). An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory. 1. Short-term responses to selection. Journal of Genetics 55, 131151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, J. & De Vos, A. L. F. (1975). Seedling growth of allopolyploids from Lolium multiflorum Lam. x Festuca arundinacea L. Euphytica 24, 181190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, K. J. R. & Cooper, J. P. (1963). The genetic control of leaf development in Lolium. II. Response to selection. Heredity 18, 307317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ene, B. N. & Bean, E. W. (1975). Variations in seed quality between certified seed lots of perennial ryegrass, and their relationship to nitrogen supply and moisture status during seed development. Journal of the British Grassland Society 30, 195199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, F. (1972). Isolation chambers for controlled pollination in grasses. Euphytica 21, 523526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, P. (1975). The influence of seed weight on seedling growth in perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and Yorkshire fog. Record of Agricultural Research Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland 23, 3343.Google Scholar
Hayes, P. (1976). Seedling growth of four grasses. Journal of the British Grassland Society 31, 5964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydecker, W. (1972). Vigour. In Viability of Seeds (ed. Roberts, E. H.), pp. 209252. London: Chapman Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, F. P. (1980). Genetic and environmental variation associated with seed establishment of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Ph.D. thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. J. & Garcia, J. A. (1979). The effect of seed weight and coleoptile tiller development on seedling vigour in tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb. Euphytica 28, 393402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcfadden, A. D. (1963). Effect of seed source on comparative test results in barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 43, 295300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magiix, F. (1974). A study of seedling establishment of tall fescue with special reference to root initiation. Ph.D. thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. R. (1980). Recurrent selection for improved rate of germination in annual ryegrass. Crop Science 20, 219–22J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, A. S. & Cooper, J. P. (1961). The influences of seasonal changes in light energy on leaf and tiller development in ryegrass, timothy and meadow fescue. Journal of the British Grassland Society 16, 299308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, J. M. (1976). Temperature and leaf growth in four grass species. Journal of Applied Ecology 13, 225232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. A. & Harrison, J. G. (1977). Effects of seed deterioration and seed-bed environment on emergence and yield of spring-sown barley. Annals of Applied Biology 86, 291300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, I. (1968). The growth and development of some grass species under competitive stress. I. Competition between seedlings and established plants. Journal of the British Grassland Society 23, 129136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, L. R. & Thomas, H. L. (1963). Combining ability for seedling vigour in Bromus inermis Leyss. Crop Science 3, 358359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, M. J. (1967). A comparison of British and North African ecotypes of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). I. Leaf growth during winter and the effects on it of temperature and day length. Journal of Applied Ecology 4, 475484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, M. J. & Jewiss, O. R. (1968). A comparison of British and North African varieties of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). II. Growth during winter and survival at low temperatures. Journal of Applied Ecology 5, 179190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roqler, G. A. (1954). Seed size and seedling vigour in crested wheatgrass. Agronomy Journal 46, 216220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G. J. A. (1964). A comparison of leaf and tiller growth in seven perennial grasses as influenced by nitrogen and temperature. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 281290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trupp, C. R. & Carlson, I. T. (1971). Improvement of seedling vigour of smooth bromegrass (Bromusinermis Leyss.) by recurrent selection for high seed weight. Crop Science 11, 225227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisnek, M. & Kanipe, L. A. (1951). Delayed germination of Lolium multijlorum– common ryegrass. Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts 41, 8688.Google Scholar
Whalley, R. D. B., Mckell, C. M. & Green, L. R. (1966)a. Seedling vigour and the early non-photosynthetic stage of seedling growth in grasses. Crop Science 6, 147150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalley, R. D. B., Mckell, C. M. & Green, L. R. (1966 b). Effect of environmental conditions during the parent generation on seedling vigour of the subsequent seedling of Oryzopsis mileacea (L.). Benth. and Hook. Crop Science 6, 510512.Google Scholar
Woodwobth, C. M., Leng, E. R. & Jungenheimer, R. W. (1952). Fifty generations of selection for protein and oil in corn. Agronomy Journal 44, 6065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. N. (1976). Recurrent selection for shifting gene frequency of seed weight in Panicum antidotale Retz. Crop Science 16, 647649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. N. (1978). Recurrent selection for changing gene frequency of germination rate in blue panic grass. Crop Science 18, 789791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar