Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:22:16.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection criteria in grass breeding III. Chemical composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Alec Lazenby  and
H. H. Rogers
Alec Lazenby
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
H. H. Rogers
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. An examination was made of four chemical components of herbage—nitrogen, crude fibre, acid-soluble ash and acid-insoluble fraction—from different genetic populations of Lolium perenne, grown in two trials at various related densities, some plots being irrigated. Dates of the frequent harvests were determined by the growth stage of the herbage.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , November 1964 , pp. 323 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelsson, J. (1949). Proc. 5th Int. Grassl. Congr., p. 266.Google Scholar
Faoan, T. W.& Jones, H. T. (1924). Bull. Welsh PL. Breed. Sta., Ser. H, No. 1, p. 85Google Scholar
Ap Griffith, G.& Thomas, D. C. (1955). Agric. Progr. 30, 124.Google Scholar
Homb, Thor. (1963). Proc. European Grassl. Symp., Hurley, England, 1964.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. K. (1962). Pasture and Range Research Techniques, p. 59. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kivimäe, A. (1960). Proc. 8th Int. Grassl. Congr., p. 466.Google Scholar
Lazendy, A.& Rogers, H. H. (1961). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 16, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazenby, A.& Rogers, H. H. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 59, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazenby, A.& Rogers, H. H. (1963). Herb. Abstr. 33, 73.Google Scholar
Lazenby, A.& Rogers, H. H. (1964). J. Agric. Sci. 62, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. B. (1961a). Herb. Abstr. 31, 81.Google Scholar
Miller, T. B. (1961b). Herb. Abstr. 31, 163.Google Scholar
Norman, A. G. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Jones, C. E.& Harris, C. E. (1955). Agric. Progr. 30, 120.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 2122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. (1922). Bull. Welsh PL Breed. Sla., Ser. H, No. 1, p. 91.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. (1924). Bull. Welsh PL Breed. Sta., Ser. H, No. 3, p. 5.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. (1933). An account of the organization and work of the station from its foundation in April 1919 to July 1933. Bull. Welsh PI. Breed. Sta., pp. 167.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. T. (1962). Agron. J. 54, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M.& Hepburn, W. P. (1955). Agric. Progr. 30, 118.Google Scholar