Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:25:42.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal patterns of energy allocation to basal metabolism, activity and production for livestock in a nomadic pastoral ecosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. L. Coppock ,
D. M. Swift ,
J. E. Ellis  and
K. Galvin
D. L. Coppock
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado Stale University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U.S.A.
D. M. Swift
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado Stale University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U.S.A.
J. E. Ellis
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado Stale University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U.S.A.
K. Galvin
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado Stale University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Energy budgets and estimates of forage intake requirements were developed for adult camels, cattle, sheep, and goats managed by nomads in the arid Turkana District of north-western Kenya. The estimates were developed by combining our field data on livestock activity patterns, diet quality, weight changes and milk yields with literature based estimates of the associated costs and efficiencies. On an annual basis, the average animal walked 17 km/day and had a total metabolizable energy (ME) allocation of 47% for basal metabolism, 16% for travel, 14% for other activities, and 23% for production. Season and species influenced patterns of energy demand and allocation. Average daily ME requirements ranged from 8·7 MJ (sheep) to 76·7 MJ (camels). ME demand for all species peaked during wet (April-May) or early-to mid-dry periods (June-October), and decreased considerably in the late-dry season (November-March). In the wet season the average sheep or goat allocated 45% of its ME budget to production of milk and gain, followed by cattle (36%) and camels (25%). All species were more similar in ME allocation for production during the late-dry season (7–13%; all to lactation), yet patterns of weight loss during this time indicated that camels experienced the lowest degree of negative energy balance. On an annual basis, camel budgets were the most deviant, as they allocated relatively more ME to activity and relatively less to basal metabolism or weight gain. Estimates of forage dry-matter intakes (per unit live weight per day) ranged from 3·8% (cattle, camels) to 4·6% (sheep, goats) throughout the year, and intakes declined for most species by an average of 50% from the wet to late-dry intervals. This approach has revealed ecological differences among livestock species that help explain the utility of multi-species holdings in this system.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 357 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Berry, H. H. & Louw, G. N. (1982). First approximation of the energy and protein budgets in free-ranging wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) in the Etosha National Park. Madoqua 13, 71–88.Google Scholar
Coppock, D. L. (1985). Feeding ecology, nutrition, and energetics of livestock in a nomadic pastoral ecosystem. Ph.D. dissertation. Colorado State University, Fort Collins.Google Scholar
Coppock, D. L., Swift, D. M. & Ellis, J. E. (1986). Seasonal nutritional characteristics of livestock diets in a nomadic pastoral ecosystem. Journal of Applied Ecology (in the Press).Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B., Ellis, J. E., Swift, D. M., Coppock, D. L., Galvin, K., McCabe, J. T. & Hart, T. C. (1985). Energy extraction and use in a nomadic pastoral ecosystem. Science 230, 619–625.Google Scholar
Dyson-Hudson, R. (1983). South Turkana herd structures and livestock/human ratios: final report on a survey of 75 Ngisonyoka awis, June-August 1982. Unpublished report. Norwegian Agency for International Development, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Galvin, K. (1985). Food procurement, diet, activity and nutrition of Ngisonyoka Turkana pastoralists in an ecological and social context. Ph.D. dissertation. State University of New York, Binghamton.Google Scholar
Garrett, W. N. & Johnson, D. E. (1983). Nutritional energetics of ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 57 (Supplement 2), 478–497.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1964). Energy costs of feeding activities and energy expenditure of grazing sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 969–973.Google Scholar
Grunnet, N. T. (1962). An ethnographic-ecological survey of the relationships between the Dinka and their cattle. Folk 4, 5–20.Google Scholar
King, J. M. (1983). Livestock Water Needs in Pastoral Africa in Relation to Climate and Forage. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Research Report No. 7. Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Little, M. A., Dyson-Hudson, N., Dyson-Hudson, R., Ellis, J. E. & Swift, D. M. (1984). Human biology and the development of an ecosystem approach. In The Ecosystem Approach in Anthropology (ed. Moran, E. F.), pp. 103–131. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, J. T. (1984). Livestock management among the Turkana: a social and ecological analysis of herding in an East African pastoral population. Ph.D. dissertation. State University of New York, Binghamton.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, W. V. & Howard, B. (1972). Comparative water and energy economy of wild and domestic mammals. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 31, 261–296.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1981). Nutritional differences between tropical and temperate pastures. In Grazing Animals (ed. Morley, F. H. W.), World Animal Science B.1 (ed. Neimann-Sorensen, A. and Tribe, D. E.), pp. 143–157. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1981). Nutrient Requirements of Goats: Angora, Dairy and Meat Goats in Temperate and Tropical Countries. National Academy of Science Report No. 15 (1st edn). Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Osuji, P. O. (1974). The physiology of eating and the energy expenditure of the ruminant at pasture. Journal of Range Management 27, 437–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T., White, O. D., Anrique, R. & Fortin, A. (1980). Nutritional energetics of livestock: some present boundaries of knowledge and future research needs. Journal of Animal Science 51, 1393–1415.Google Scholar
Robbins, C. T. (1983). Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition, 343 pp. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rogerson, A. (1968). Energy utilization by the eland and the wildebeest. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 21, 153–161.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K., Crawford, E. C., Newsome, A. E., Rawson, K. S. & Hammel, H. T. (1967). Metabolic rate of camels: effects of body temperature and dehydration. American Journal of Physiology 212, 341–346.Google Scholar