Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:03:09.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal fluctuations in the sexual activity of Awassi, German Mutton Merino, Corriedale, Border-Leicester and Dorset Horn rams:III. Seasonal changes in the fructolytic and respiratory rate of spermatozoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Amir ,
A. Genizi  and
R. Volcani
D. Amir
Affiliation:
The National and University Institute of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel
A. Genizi
Affiliation:
The National and University Institute of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel
R. Volcani
Affiliation:
The National and University Institute of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The metabolic activity of spermatozoa, obtained from Awassi, German Mutton Merino, Corriedale and Dorset Horn rams, waa measured every 2–4 weeks over a 2-year period.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 1965 , pp. 127 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amir, D. & Volcani, R. (1964a). J. Agric. Sci. 64, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amir, D.& Volcani, R. (1964b). J. Agric. Sci. 64, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. W. (1958). Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Bishop, M. W. H., Campbell, R. C, Hancock, J. K.& Walton, A. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1941). A study of the physiology of ram spermatozoa. Ph.D. Thesis to University of Cambridge, England. Cited by Yeates, N. T. M. (1949), J. Agric. Sci. 39, 1.Google Scholar
Chang, M. C.& Walton, A. (1940). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 129, 517.Google Scholar
Comstock, R. E., Green, W. W., Winters, L. M.& Nordskog, A. W. (1943). Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta.no. 162.Google Scholar
Erb, R. E., Flerohinger, F. H., Ehlers, M. H.& Gassner, F. X. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 39, 326.Google Scholar
Freund, M., Mixner, J. P.& Mather, R. W. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, M.& Murphree, R. L. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 1320.Google Scholar
Gosh, D., Casida, L. E.& Lardy, H. A. (1949). J. Anim. Sci. 8, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T.& Lutwak-Mann, C. (1955). Arch. Sci. biol. 39, 578.Google Scholar
Mixner, J. P., Mather, R. E.& Freund, M. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Lord (1948). J. Exp. Biol. 25, 353.Google Scholar
Scheffé, H. (1960). Analysis of Variance. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H.& Stauffer, J. F. (1957). Manometric Techniques. Minneapolis, Minn.: Burgess Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Walton, A.& Edwards, J. (1938). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 31, 254. Cited by Bishop, et al. (1954).Google Scholar