Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T18:36:18.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) a legume with great ecological and agronomical potential under climate change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2024

Anis Sakhraoui*
Affiliation:
Higher School of Agriculture of Kef, University of Jendouba, Le Kef, Tunisia Department of Agricultural Production – Laboratory of Agricultural Production Systems and Sustainable Development (SPADD), LR03AGR02, Higher School of Agriculture of Mograne, Carthage University, Mograne, Zaghouan, Tunisia Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
Hela B. Ltaeif
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Production – Laboratory of Agricultural Production Systems and Sustainable Development (SPADD), LR03AGR02, Higher School of Agriculture of Mograne, Carthage University, Mograne, Zaghouan, Tunisia
Asma Sakhraoui
Affiliation:
Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Beja, University of Jendouba, Beja, Tunisia Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, Bragança, Portugal
Juan J. Villalba
Affiliation:
Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
Jesús M. Castillo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
Slim Rouz
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Production – Laboratory of Agricultural Production Systems and Sustainable Development (SPADD), LR03AGR02, Higher School of Agriculture of Mograne, Carthage University, Mograne, Zaghouan, Tunisia
*
Corresponding author: Anis Sakhraoui; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Climate change is a global challenge to ecosystem services, altering crop yields and food security worldwide. In the context of climate change, Onobrychis viciifolia Scop. (sainfoin) can offer a multitude of ecosystem services conferred by its multifaceted beneficial properties. We reviewed the morphological, biochemical and physiological responses to environmental stressors of O. viciifolia, summarized its ecological, agronomic, nutritional and biological interests, and we discussed its use under climate change. Onobrychis viciifolia is a hemicryptophyte forage legume adapted to arid and semiarid regions by evolving a diverse array of protective mechanisms against abiotic stressors at morphological, biochemical and physiological levels. In the present scenario of climate change, O. viciifolia has desirable forage characteristics such as high nutritive value, high voluntary intake and palatability to grazing animals, leading to satisfying animal performance for milk, meat, honey and wool production. Recent studies suggest that O. viciifolia has several highly beneficial phytochemical properties including condensed tannins and polyphenol content, which have been demonstrated to have anthelmintic activities, enhance protein utilization, and prevent bloating. In addition, O. viciifolia also has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and sequestrate atmospheric carbon and nitrogen into the soil. Ethnobotanical investigations show that O. viciifolia possesses antimicrobial, antiseptic and vulnerary activities. This review could be helpful for understanding of O. viciifolia characteristics, interests and uses, thus promoting its reasonable cultivation under a changing climate.

Type
Crops and Soils Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Global climate change has become a compelling environmental problem as it is hindering the yield performance of crops due to increasing environmental stresses including pest diseases and extreme climatic events (Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Xu, Zhou and Tao2016; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Pan, Gu, Ma, Zhang, Li and Shi2019a; Bakala et al., Reference Bakala, Mandahal, Sarao and Srivastava2021; Skendžić et al., Reference Skendžić, Zovko, Živković, Lešić and Lemić2021). In addition, climate change may exacerbate soil erosion (Lal, Reference Lal2012) and cause disturbances to ecosystem functions (van der Geest et al., Reference van der Geest, van der Geest, de Sherbinin, Kienberger, Zommers, Sitati, Roberts, James, Mechler, Bouwer, Schinko, Surminski and Linnerooth-Bayer2019). Ecosystems functions are the respective direct and indirect benefits arising from the ecological functioning of healthy productive ecological systems (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005; Beaumont et al., Reference Beaumont, Austen, Atkins, Burdon, Degraer, TP, Derous, Holm, Horton, van Eerland, AH, Starkey, Townsend and Zarzycki2007). Crop yields are projected to decline through the 21st century (Zinyengere et al., Reference Zinyengere, Crespo and Hachigonta2013; Petersen, Reference Petersen2019) and there is a need to identify and characterized perennial forage legumes that would be able to stand high environmental stress levels while offering relatively high agronomic production (Seo and Mendelsohn, Reference Seo and Mendelsohn2008; Komainda et al., Reference Komainda, Küchenmeister, Küchenmeister, Breitsameter, Wrage-Mönnig, Kayser and Isselstein2019). Moreover, ecological restoration of degraded lands is included in the array of adaptation and mitigation responses to climate change (Harris et al., Reference Harris, Hobbs, Higgs and Aronson2006; O'Mara, Reference O'Mara2012; Simonson et al., Reference Simonson, Miller, Jones, García-Rangel, Thornton and McOwen2021).

The genus Onobrychis Miller (Fam. Fabaceae) comprises a few agronomically known forage legume species such as O. transcaucasica Grossh., O. arenaria (Kit.) DC. and O. viciifolia Scop. (sainfoin), the most commonly cultivated species of the genus (Lock, Reference Lock, Lewis, Schrire, Mackinder and Lock2005; Mabberley, Reference Mabberley2008; Amirahmadi et al., Reference Amirahmadi, Kazempour-Osaloo, Moein, Kaveh and Maassoumi2014). Onobrychis viciifolia has a long history of traditional cultivation in Europe, Asia and North America in the 19th and 20th centuries (Miller and Hoveland, Reference Miller and Hoveland1995; Frame et al., Reference Frame, Charlton and Laidlaw1998). Indeed, its cultivation decline started in the middle of the 20th century due to the adoption of more intensive farming methods with the introduction of relatively low-cost nitrogen (N) fertilizers (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). Consequently, O. viciifolia cultivation was gradually displaced by alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and clover species (Trifolium spp.) whose higher yields and easier establishment made them more desirable to farmers. Onobrychis viciifolia can be cultivated in multitude soils and climatic conditions (Tufenkci et al., Reference Tufenkci, Erman and Sonmez2006; Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011; Yin et al., Reference Yin, Zhou, Wang, Tran and Zhang2020). Agronomically, O. viciifolia have positive characteristics such as a deep tap root that allows it to be very tolerant to drought (Irani et al., Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Zargar and Karami2015a, Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Karami and Zargar2015b; Malisch et al., Reference Malisch, Salminen, Kölliker, Engström, Suter, Studer and Lüscher2016) and N fixation up to 168 kg N2/ha via symbiosis with rhizobia (Malisch et al., Reference Malisch, Suter, Studer and Lüscher2017). Culture trials of O. viciifolia under harsh climatic conditions of dry areas in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region gave promising results (Le Houérou, Reference Le Houérou1969; Jafari et al., Reference Jafari, Rasoli, Tabaei-Aghdaei, Shanjani and Alizadeh2014; Sayar et al., Reference Sayar, Han and Basbag2022). In addition, O. viciifolia is also particularly valued for its content of condensed tannins, which have been shown to improve animal growth and health (Waghorn, Reference Waghorn2008; Girard et al., Reference Girard, Dohme-Meier, Wechsler, Goy, Kreuzer and Bee2016).

The Mediterranean Basin has been identified as one of the most climate-vulnerable regions and a climate change ‘hotspot’ (Salvia et al., Reference Salvia, Olazabal, Fokaides, Tardieu, Simoes, Geneletti, Huartado, Viguié, Spyridaki, Pietrapertosa, Ioannou, Matosovic, Flamos, Balzan, Feliu, Riznar, Sel, Heidrich and Reckien2021). In addition, the Mediterranean Basin is one of the areas with the most serious soil degradation and desertification rates in the world, reaching critical limits for its ability to provide ecosystem services and land productivity (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, Destouni, Ghajarnia and Kalantari2022). In this sense, the large-scale grassland degradation in Mediterranean Basin aggravates the shortage of forage supply (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, Destouni, Ghajarnia and Kalantari2022; Soares et al., Reference Soares, Rolim, Fradinho and do Paço2022). Consequently, restoring degraded grasslands and increasing forage grass supply are urgent needs in this area, but the forage quality of O. viciifolia has not been deeply studied in the Mediterranean Basin. Additionally, O. viciifolia has obvious application advantages in soil and vegetation restoration that should be also analysed in detail in the Mediterranean Basin.

The study of O. viciifolia has regained interest in recent decades (Fig. 1) and four studies have reviewed its cultivation and agronomic potential (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011; Bhattarai et al., Reference Bhattarai, Coulman and Biligetu2016; Mora-Ortiz and Smith, Reference Mora-Ortiz and Smith2018; Sheppard et al., Reference Sheppard, Cattani, Ominski, Biligetu, Bittman and McGeough2019). However, no work has focussed on the role of O. viciifolia in the present scenario of climate change. In this work, we review the geographical distribution, main functional traits, stress tolerance and beneficial proprieties for humans of O. viciifolia under the ongoing climate change scenario. Our review is meant to provide information on the importance of O. viciifolia for its possible utilization in cropping systems in a changing environment. Also, it is an attempt to recognize the lesser-explored aspects and knowledge gaps in the research on O. viciifolia.

Figure 1. Evolution of annual number of publications on Onobrychis species and O. viciifolia published from 1963 to 2024 (Sources: Google Scholar, Web of Science, Springer and PubMed).

Methods

Google Scholar, Web of Science, Springer and PubMed databases were used to search for published literature on O. viciifolia. The filtering was based on titles, abstracts and keywords including the words Hedysarum onobrychis L., Onobrychis sativa Lam., Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop. and O. viciifolia Scop. or sainfoin. Afterwards, the full text of all peer reviewed articles, books, book chapters and PhD thesis were reviewed. The deadline for the literature selected was up to July 2024. The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/search?q=Onobrychis+viciifolia), International Plant Name Index (https://www.ipni.org/n/510168-1), Kew Botanical Garden (https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:510168-1) and Global Biodiversity Information Facility (https://www.gbif.org/fr/species/2972595) were used for validating the scientific name as well as information on cultivars and the species synonyms.

Origin and distribution

Onobrychis viciifolia is derived from the natural hybridization between O. arenaria and O. montana (Falistocco, Reference Falistocco1991), which are native to Central-Southern Europe, and temperate Southwest Asia and North Africa, respectively (Angevain and Prosperi, Reference Angevain, Prosperi, Prosperi, Guy el and Balfourier1995; Jin et al., Reference Jin, Jiang, Yi and Pang2021). Onobrychis viciifolia is mostly tetraploid, through there are reports of diploid accessions (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Carbonero, Smith and Brown2013). In addition, Abou-El-Enain (Reference Abou-El-Enain2002) reported the appearance of 2n = 22, 27, 28 and 29 chromosomes that demonstrated the role of aneuploid alterations in the evolution of this species.

A few Onobrychis taxa, such as O. viciifolia, have been cultivated for hundreds of years as forage and ornamental crops in warm and temperate regions of Europe, Asia and North America (Lock and Simpson, Reference Lock and Simpson1991; Yakovlev et al., Reference Yakovlev, Sytin and Roskov1996; Mabberley, Reference Mabberley1997; Frame et al., Reference Frame, Charlton and Laidlaw1998; Frame, Reference Frame2005; Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011) (Fig. 2). Cultivated Onobrychis species were introduced to Central Europe from the Mediterranean Basin during the 16th century (Piper, Reference Piper1924; Burton and Curley, Reference Burton and Curley1968). Onobrychis cultivation was introduced to North America in 1786 (Bhattarai et al., Reference Bhattarai, Coulman and Biligetu2016), but was only grown occasionally until the 1960s, when improved varieties allowed wider cultivation. Today, O. viciifolia is cultivated mainly in Eastern Europe, Iran and around the Mediterranean Basin (Eken et al., Reference Eken, Demirci and Dane2004; Avci et al., Reference Avci, Ilhan, Erayman and Sancak2014; Bolat, Reference Bolat2019). The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most affected regions by climate change (Cammarano et al., Reference Cammarano, Ceccarelli, Grando, Romagosa, Benbelkacem, Akar, Al-Yassin, Pecchioni, Francia and Ronga2019). One of the most relevant consequences of climate change is certainly water scarcity, as result of a reduction of surface runoff and groundwater levels (Noto et al., Reference Noto, Cipolla, Pumo and Francipane2023). Onobrychis viciifolia once represented an important forage legume in semiarid environments of Italy, but its cultivation area has decreased from 160 to 9 thousand ha from 1983 to 2013 (ISTAT, 2013). It is recorded that more than 150 tonnes of seeds were sold every year in the late 1950s in the UK, enough for cropping 2500 ha (Hill, Reference Hill, Lane and Wilkinson1997). In the late 1970s, only approximately 150 ha were cropped. Today, O. viciifolia has become rare in the UK, and this is due, in part, to its poor response to the changing requirements and circumstance of British agriculture (Hutchinson, Reference Hutchinson1966). Onobrychis viciifolia could potentially be grown on 950 thousand ha in England and Wales, where the soil is sufficiently alkaline (Doyle et al., Reference Doyle, Griffin, Bagheri and Dorow1984). On the other hand, Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Li, Zhang, Liu, Li, Liu, Li and Chen2018) mentioned O. viciifolia as a major fodder grass species cultivated in Gansu Province, Northwest China, in 2016.

Figure 2. Centenary evolution of worldwide geographical distribution of Onobrychis viciifolia (88.635 occurrences) from 1600 to 2024. The colours from yellow to orange represent the density of occurrence for a given area.

Source: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, https://www.gbif.org/

Responses to environmental stressors

Biotic stressors

Ongoing climate change poses considerable threats to sustainable food security, including increased number of generations of pests and plant pathogens resulting from a compressed life cycle due to a warmer climate combined to elevated CO2 concentrations, increased risk of invasion by migratory pests and reduced effectiveness of biological control (Skendžić et al., Reference Skendžić, Zovko, Živković, Lešić and Lemić2021). As climate change exacerbates the pest problem, there is a great need for future pest management strategies (Wei et al., Reference Wei, Peng, He, Lu and Wang2020). Onobrychis viciifolia is relatively resistant to most common pests and diseases in Western Canada and Northern Europe compared with other legumes such as M. sativa (Goplen et al., Reference Goplen, Richards and Moyer1991; Frame et al., Reference Frame, Charlton and Laidlaw1998). This has been attributed to the presence of a range of secondary metabolites, such as tannins and polyphenols, within the foliage of O. viciifolia (Malisch et al., Reference Malisch, Salminen, Kölliker, Engström, Suter, Studer and Lüscher2016). Even so, O. viciifolia can be damaged by fungal diseases related to certain Fusarium, Stemphyllium and Sclerotinia species (Mathre, Reference Mathre, Cooper and Carleton1968). In addition, an important number of insect and nematode species can damage O. viciifolia stands (Mathre, Reference Mathre, Cooper and Carleton1968; Wallace, Reference Wallace1968; Morrill et al., Reference Morrill, Ditterline and Cash1998). But O. viciifolia is resistant to the alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica Gyll.), so it can be an alternative forage legume to M. sativa in areas where this pest causes severe damage (Morrill et al., Reference Morrill, Ditterline and Cash1998; Böttger et al., Reference Böttger, Bundy, Oesterle and Hanson2013).

Onobrychis viciifolia is relatively resistant and free from serious pest and disease problems compared with other legumes such as M. sativa (Goplen et al., Reference Goplen, Richards and Moyer1991). Medicago sativa suffers from several economically important insect pests such as H. postica and Acyrthosiphon pisum, which do not affect O. viciifolia. This could encourage farmers to grow O. viciifolia as an alternative solution to M. sativa (Morrill et al., Reference Morrill, Ditterline and Cash1998). Two closely related species to H. postica (Phytonomus farinosus and Hypera trilineata) are mentioned as pests of O. viciifolia in some European countries (Wallace, Reference Wallace1968). Other pests such as Empoasca fabae, Lygus elisus, L. hesperus and Adelphocoris lineolatus appeared to have marginal effects on O. viciifolia and occurs only in localized areas (Morrill et al., Reference Morrill, Ditterline and Cash1998). Furthermore, only one pest (Sitona scissifrons), which feed on the roots of O. viciifolia, has been observed on accessions growing in United Kingdom, but there were no accessions that were severely affected (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). Adult S. scissifrons weevils become active in the field in June and eat the edges of the leaves of O. viciifolia, leaving characteristic notches along the leaves in Montana (USA). This damage could be disastrous at the seedling stage in the field (Wallace, Reference Wallace1968). Other members from this genus, including S. lineata, S. calloso and S. crinite, have been reported to cause minor damage in O. viciifolia in Europe (Wallace, Reference Wallace1968). However, Contarinia onobrychidis and Eurytoma onobrychidis represent a serious pest for O. viciifolia in some areas of Europe (Wallace, Reference Wallace1968). Other insects can also damage the seed production of O. viciifolia in Europe but marginally; these include Perrisia onobrychidis, Apion pisi, Odontothrips intermedius, Otiorhynchus ligustici and Melanotus erythropus. Therefore, the inclusion of O. viciifolia as a rotation component could affect the presence of host-specific pests by disturbing their life cycle.

Abiotic stressors

Climate change is increasing the frequency and intensity of abiotic stress combinations that pose a serious threat to crop productivity (Zandalinas et al., Reference Zandalinas, Balfagon, Gomez-Cadenas and Mittler2022). Onobrychis viciifolia have evolved a diverse array of protective mechanisms against abiotic stressors at biochemical and physiological levels related to hormone homoeostasis, transcriptional factors, photosynthesis, and the biosynthesis of antioxidants and osmotic adjustment-related substances (Yin et al., Reference Yin, Zhou and Wang2021). Consequently, O. viciifolia tolerates low nutrient conditions (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011), high levels of active lime in the soil (De Falco et al., Reference De Falco, Landi and Basso2000a, Reference De Falco, Landi, Basso and Sulas2000b), drought and alkalinity, and saline-alkaline stress (Fig. 3). In addition, O. viciifolia tolerates high concentrations of lead and copper (Beladi et al., Reference Beladi, Habibi, Kashani, Paknejad and Nooralvandi2011) and can grow in coal mined areas (Roy et al., Reference Roy, Núñez-Delgado, Wang, Kader, Sarker, Hasan and Dindaroglu2021). Moreover, O. viciifolia can grow under seasonally cold and hot climatic conditions (Sengul, Reference Sengul2003; Tufenkci et al., Reference Tufenkci, Erman and Sonmez2006), and extreme climatic conditions at high altitudes (Yin et al., Reference Yin, Zhou, Wang, Tran and Zhang2020, Reference Yin, Zhou and Wang2021). Rhizobia have the potential to be used in improving symbiotic N fixation on O. viciifolia under cold stress (Prévost et al., Reference Prévost, Drouin, Laberge, Bertrand, Cloutier and Lévesque2003). Climate change can affect the intensity and frequency of precipitation (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Thompson, Woods and Porporato2019) and worsen ozone pollution over many populated regions, with larger impacts at higher concentrations (East et al., Reference East, Monier, Saari and Garcia-Menendez2024). It has long been observed that the environmental gamma-ray dose rate increases noticeably during precipitation intervals (Mercier et al., Reference Mercier, Tracy, d'Amours, Chagnon, Hoffman, Korpach, Johnson and Ungar2009). Onobrychis viciifolia tolerates high levels of gamma radiation (Beyaz et al., Reference Beyaz, Sancak, Yildiz, Kuşvuran and Yildiz2016), but its growth is reduced after ozone exposure (Bungener et al., Reference Bungener, Balls, Nussbaum, Geissmann, Grub and Fuhrer1999).

Figure 3. Summary of the main tolerance mechanisms of Onobrychis viciifolia to (a) salinity and (b) drought stress.

Salt tolerance

Salt is one of the main abiotic stresses affecting crop yields around the world (Zörb et al., Reference Zörb, Geilfus and Dietz2019). Seed germination is one of the most sensitive physiological phenomena to stress in the lifecycle of plants (Al-Turki et al., Reference Al-Turki, Davy, Al-Ammari and Basahi2022), and seeds of O. viciifolia withstand moderate saline environments (up to 400 mM). In this sense, seeds of O. viciifolia retain germinability under high salinity, displaying tolerance mechanisms such as physiological dormancy till the occurrence of favourable conditions (Li et al., Reference Li, Wu and Sexton2021a, Reference Li, Zhu, White, Wei and Wu2021b). Karamian and Ataei-Barazande (Reference Karamian and Ataei-Barazande2013) reported decreasing germination rates in O. viciifolia with increasing salinity levels over 200 mM NaCl and indicated that germination was totally inhibited at 400 mM NaCl which is higher than for Trifolium repens L. (up to 180 mM) (Chu et al., Reference Chu, Gao, Chen, McCullough, Jespersen, Sapkota, Bagavathiannan and Yu2022), Trifolium pratense L. (up to 240 mM) (Asci, Reference Asci2011) and M. sativa (up to 257 mM) (Kadri et al., Reference Kadri, Chaabena, Abdelguerfi and Laouar2021). The germination of O. viciifolia is considered more tolerant to salinities c. 170 mM NaCl than other Onobrychis species (Uzun et al., Reference Uzun, Avci, Ozcan and Sancak2017).

Saline-alkaline conditions resulted in oxidative stress and the accumulation of proline in seedlings of O. viciifolia (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Li, Zhu and Li2021). Along with organic osmolytes, O. viciifolia under salinity also increased the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase and ascorbate peroxidase (Beyaz, Reference Beyaz2019). In fact, O. viciifolia can grow without much yield and quality loss in salt-affected areas (c. 109 mM NaCl), where it can provide enough high-quality forage production for livestock without altering its macro-mineral content (Temel et al., Reference Temel, Keskin, Şimşek and Yilmaza2016a, Reference Temel, Keskin, Şimşek and Yilmaza2016b) (Fig. 3a). Nonetheless, Wu et al. (Reference Wu, Feng, Li and Du2017a, Reference Wu, Feng, Wang and Du2017b) reported reduced growth and chlorophyll and water contents, diminished root potassium concentration, and increased malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration and relative membrane permeability in O. viciifolia shoots under salinity (100 mM NaCl). This study also reported that, when supplied exogenously, proline and silicon improved salt stress tolerance in O. viciifolia by mitigating sodium toxicity (Fig. 3a). Under salinity, O. viciifolia maintain better cellular function and overall physiological homoeostasis evidenced by less drastic imbalance in intracellular Na+/K+ ratio than M. sativa (Li et al., Reference Li, Fukuda and Yang2010; Beyaz Reference Beyaz2019) which is one of the key determinants of plant salt tolerance under climate change (El Sabagh et al., Reference El Sabagh, Islam, Skalicky, Ali Raza, Singh and Anwar Hossain2021).

Drought tolerance

Drought is the largest contributor to world-wide crop losses (Lesk et al., Reference Lesk, Rowhani and Ramankutty2016; Santos-Medellín et al., Reference Santos-Medellín, Liechty, Edwards, Nguyen, Huang, Weimer and Sundaresan2021). In this general context that is exacerbated by climate change (Cook et al., Reference Cook, Mankin and Anchukaitis2018), O. viciifolia produces indehiscent fruits (pods) that break down slowly, promoting seed survivorship during drought periods (Majidi and Barati, Reference Majidi and Barati2011; Avci and Kaya, Reference Avci and Kaya2013). In this sense, organic, hydrogel and mineral seed coating improved germination speed of O. viciifolia with and without drought (Mehrabi and Chaichi, Reference Mehrabi and Chaichi2012). Contradictorily, Kintl et al. (Reference Kintl, Huňady, Vymyslický, Ondrisková, Hammerschmiedt, Brtnický and Elbl2021) showed that O. viciifolia did not respond positively to the seed coating under drought. Uncoated seeds exhibited a greater drought resistance than the coated seeds which showed a sharp, significant decline of germination capacity and a great increase in the dead seed percentage due to the death of a fraction from the hard seeds.

Nasirzadeh et al. (Reference Nasirzadeh, Khorram and Heydari2005) reported that O. viciifolia can be considered as a semi-resistant species to drought. Adult plants of O. viciifolia tolerate exposure to the combined effects of drought and ozone (Bungener et al., Reference Bungener, Balls, Nussbaum, Geissmann, Grub and Fuhrer1999). The response mechanisms of O. viciifolia to drought include osmotic adjustment (Dehabadi, Reference Dehabadi1997; Irani et al., Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Zargar and Karami2015a, Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Karami and Zargar2015b; Beyaz, Reference Beyaz2019; Beyaz and Yildiz, Reference Beyaz and Yildiz2021), ROS scavenging, reduced transpiration (Roy et al., Reference Roy, Núñez-Delgado, Wang, Kader, Sarker, Hasan and Dindaroglu2021), increasing stomatal resistance and water use efficiency (Dehabadi et al., Reference Dehabadi, Kemp, Barker and Hodgson1993a, Reference Dehabadi, Kemp, Barker and Hodgson1993b; Dehabadi, Reference Dehabadi1997; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Liu, Tian and Wu2020), and increasing carotenoid contents with decreasing chlorophyll contents (Irani et al., Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Zargar and Karami2015a, Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Karami and Zargar2015b). In addition, O. viciifolia tolerance to drought involves also morphological adaptations such as a deep root system (Koch et al., Reference Koch, Dotzenko and Hinze1972; Dehabadi, Reference Dehabadi1997; March-Salas et al., Reference March-Salas, van Kleunen and Fitze2021) and reduced leaf area (Dehabadi et al., Reference Dehabadi, Kemp, Barker and Hodgson1993b). Besides all its responses to drought, O. viciifolia shows reduced plant heights which resulted in significant yield losses when exposed to severe drought (Irani et al., Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Zargar and Karami2015a, Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Karami and Zargar2015b). In this sense, Bolger and Matches (Reference Bolger and Matches1990) found a higher yield potential for O. viciifolia in spring than in summer, possibly indicating higher water use efficiency. To tide over periodic drought stress, Malisch et al. (Reference Malisch, Salminen, Kölliker, Engström, Suter, Studer and Lüscher2016) highlighted the importance of harvesting at optimal stages to have good forage performance for O. viciifolia.

Onobrychis viciifolia have greater ability to resist drought and adapt to dry habitats compared to several forage species. Considering the field capacity as the upper limit of soil water availability, O. viciifolia had the widest range of adaptability to soil water compared to other crop species such as Astragalus adsurgens, Elymus nutans and Lolium multiflorum (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Liu, Tian and Wu2020). Moreover, O. viciifolia exhibited a lower average lower limit of relative soil water content compared to A. adsurgens, E. nutans, and L. multiflorum. In addition, O. viciifolia closed stomata more rapidly with the decrease of relative soil water content, suggesting that the species had better drought resistance and allowed plants to keep water in plant tissues (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Liu, Tian and Wu2020). The intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) represents an important indicator of the adaptability for higher plants to climate change (Weiwei et al., Reference Weiwei, Xinxiao, Guodong, LI and LIU2018). WUEi increased more rapidly in O. viciifolia than the other three forage under moderate water deficit (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Liu, Tian and Wu2020).

High temperatures tolerance

Onobrychis viciifolia is an alternative forage for semi-arid regions, where M. sativa and Trifolium sp. cannot be sown. Although there is little published data, there is considerable observational evidence that O. viciifolia is tolerant to relatively high temperatures. Maximum air temperatures of above 32°C did not affect O. viciifolia in small plots in northern Greece and southern Spain (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). However, O. viciifolia exhibits poor growth following periods of high ambient temperatures and few plants survived at 35°C due to severe leaf loss causing plant death because high metabolic rates cannot be supported by existing leaf area or taproot carbohydrates even under well-watered conditions (Kallenbach et al., Reference Kallenbach, Matches and Mahan1996). High temperatures at the beginning of summer interrupt regrowth under traditional and intensive cutting regimes in southern Italy (De Falco et al., Reference De Falco, Landi and Basso2000a, Reference De Falco, Landi, Basso and Sulas2000b). Onobrychis viciifolia had a higher rate of biomass accumulation compared to M. sativa. However, M. sativa tended to grow faster during the warmer months (July–September) in Texas (USA).

Interests and uses

Agronomic characteristics and value

Changing climatic conditions have reduced plant productivity and generated food security issues. In this context of food security, legumes exhibit promising benefits making them an exceptional food to meet nutritional needs (Akram et al., Reference Akram, Shafiq and Ashraf2018). Onobrychis viciifolia is considered as an excellent component of a rotation in cropping systems by enhancing productivity and improving soil physicochemical properties including soil texture, fertility, water retention and organic matter content (Decourtye et al., Reference Decourtye, Lecompte, Pierre, Chauzat and Thiébeau2007; Malisch et al., Reference Malisch, Suter, Studer and Lüscher2017; Sariyildiz and Savaci, Reference Sariyildiz and Savaci2020).

Agronomic advantages

Global climate change is predicted to impact on soil fertility through the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil due to rise in temperature, alternation in precipitation patterns, increase in greenhouse gases concentration in the atmosphere, etc. (Mondal, Reference Mondal, Choudhary, Mishra and Varma2021; Bibi and Rahman, Reference Bibi and Rahman2023). In addition, climate change could lead to the loss of soil function for fertility maintenance and greater dependence on mineral fertilizers (Pareek, Reference Pareek2017). For centuries, O. viciifolia was widely grown across Europe before commercial fertilizers were used. The species does not need fertile soil to thrive if its requirements for lime and humidity are satisfied. Onobrychis viciifolia can thrive in less fertile soils than M. sativa and T. repens and can also grow well in more fertile soils. Medicago sativa and T. repens will, however, produce better yields in fertile and irrigated lands, but O. viciifolia provides better outcomes growing in low fertility soils compared with M. sativa (Benaiges, Reference Benaiges1971; Demdoum, Reference Demdoum2012).

Mature plants of O. viciifolia have over 2-m-long taproots, partly responsible for its drought tolerance. The root is quite branched, especially at the bottom and multiples thin lateral roots constitute the bulk of the root system (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011; Mora-Ortiz and Smith, Reference Mora-Ortiz and Smith2018). The O. viciifolia root systems rivals M. sativa for its ability to access deep subterranean waters (Mora-Ortiz and Smith, Reference Mora-Ortiz and Smith2018). In the Mediterranean Basin, O. viciifolia prefers altitudes above 600 m, but it performs well when cultivated in a range between 100 and 2500 m (García Salmerón et al., Reference García Salmerón, Montserrat, Buendía, Ruiz-del-Castillo and Allue1966; Demdoum, Reference Demdoum2012).

Agronomic disadvantages

Onobrychis viciifolia is a forage legume of renewed interest worldwide, with equally weighted advantages and disadvantages that prevent many farmers from considering this crop a viable alternative to other forage legumes. In this sense, a wide distribution of O. viciifolia in productive grassland systems is hampered by the limited availability of high-performing cultivars adapted to different environmental conditions (Subedi, Reference Subedi2018; Sheppard et al., Reference Sheppard, Cattani, Ominski, Biligetu, Bittman and McGeough2019). In fact, O. viciifolia weaknesses are related to its lower yield when compared to other forage legumes, its poor competitive ability against weeds especially during the establishment year, a limited persistence, susceptibility to waterlogging and frost (Sheehy and Popple, Reference Sheehy and Popple1981; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Baines, Lane and Davies2010), low tolerance to frequent cutting (Malisch et al., Reference Malisch, Suter, Studer and Lüscher2017), and susceptibility to diseases such as powdery mildew or Phytophthora root rot (Sears et al., Reference Sears, Ditterline and Mathre1975; Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). Onobrychis viciifolia prefers well-drained soils and does not grow well in heavy soils or under flood irrigation (García Salmerón et al., Reference García Salmerón, Montserrat, Buendía, Ruiz-del-Castillo and Allue1966; Demdoum, Reference Demdoum2012; Anderson, Reference Anderson2016). Onobrychis viciifolia does not perform properly in acidic soils. Poor O. viciifolia establishment was obtained on soils at pH lower than 6 (Bland, Reference Bland1971; Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). In Spain, O. viciifolia is traditionally cultivated on neutral or slightly alkaline brown-earth soils.

Onobrychis viciifolia died out primarily during winter due to aerial interspecific competition, resulting in reduced root reserves (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Baines, Lane and Davies2010). Persistence of O. viciifolia appears to be dependent on minimal pressure from competing plants, harvest or grazing, and good growth conditions from midsummer into fall, allowing for adequate root reserves for survival. It is possible that judicious use of glyphosate in late season might lessen competition in that critical period as O. viciifolia is more glyphosate-tolerant than M. sativa (Peel et al., Reference Peel, Ransom and Mott2013).

Crop residue

Due to its deep, extensive and nodulated roots system, O. viciifolia uses water reserves in deep soil layers, increases carbon sequestration, reduces moisture and nutrient loss through leaching and runoff, prevents soil erosion, and improves the physicochemical and microbiological properties of the soil, including reductions on nitrification rates (Sergeeva, Reference Sergeeva1955; Komainda et al., Reference Komainda, Küchenmeister, Küchenmeister, Breitsameter, Wrage-Mönnig, Kayser and Isselstein2019; Clemensen et al., Reference Clemensen, Villalba, Lee, Provenza, Duke and Reeve2022). The irrigated cultivation of O. viciifolia accumulate in the soil up to 16.2 t/ha/year of residues, which represents approximately four times the quantity left by M. sativa (4.2 t/ha/year) (Sergeeva, Reference Sergeeva1955). This could be explained by its high root biomass compared to other cultivated legumes (Bolat, Reference Bolat2019; Rossi et al., Reference Rossi, Mao, Merino-Martín, Roumet, Fort, Taugourdeau, Boukcim, Fourtier, Del Rey-Granado, Chevallier, Cardinael, Fromin and Stokes2020). In fact, O. viciifolia can be used for soil organic matter improvement (Porqueddu et al., Reference Porqueddu, Ledda and Roggero2000; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Zhao, Liu, Wang, Qiu, Alexandrov and Jothiprakash2018). In view of these studies, cultivating O. viciifolia would help increasing the role of agricultural soils as carbon sinks to mitigate climate change.

In addition to supplies biologically fixed N2, O. viciifolia displays a range of adaptations for the acquisition and retention of other important resources. O. viciifolia has excellent resource use efficiency in low input environments (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). By virtue of their large active root systems and mycorrhization, O. viciifolia can efficiently accelerate the absorption of water and nutrients (Kong et al., Reference Kong, Pei, Du, Sun and Zhang2014). Onobrychis viciifolia has the ability to acquire phosphorous via specialized root structures, through arbuscular mycorrhizal associations under controlled environment (Kong et al., Reference Kong, Pei, Du, Sun and Zhang2014). The large rooting systems of O. viciifolia function to increase soil organic C by reducing erosion, reducing microbial respiration (via lack of tillage). As a result, nutrients are retained in the cropping system for use by subsequent crops (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011).

Fossil fuel burning in the energy sector is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Biofuels, considered as a substitute for fossil fuels, have become top priority due to its eco-friendly nature (Prasad et al., Reference Prasad, Kumar, Sheetal and Venkatramanan2020). In addition to the biodiesel production from the legume (Ndukwu and Onyeoziri, Reference Ndukwu and Onyeoziri2022), all the biomass of O. viciifolia can serve to produce second-generation biofuel due to its high N content (Slepetys et al., Reference Slepetys, Kadziuliene, Sarunaite, Tilvikiene and Kryzeviciene2012). Moreover, the use of O. viciifolia showed potential for methane production in biogas plants (Hunady et al., Reference Hunady, Ondriskova, Hutyrova, Kubikova, Hammerschmiedt and Mezera2021).

Onobrychis viciifolia contains phenolic compounds (tannins) that can influence soil nutrient dynamics by inhibiting microbial activity, which could slow N mineralization rates and minimize N losses in field (Clemensen et al., Reference Clemensen, Villalba, Rottinghaus, Lee, Provenza and Reeve2020, Reference Clemensen, Villalba, Lee, Provenza, Duke and Reeve2022; Slebodnik et al., Reference Slebodnik, Reeve, Norton, MacAdam and Lee2019). Tannins, at low concentrations in the soil, may increase some enzyme activity (Adamczyk et al., Reference Adamczyk, Karonen, Adamczyk, Engström, Laakso, Saranpää, Kitunen, Smolander and Simon2017), inactivate other soil enzymes, in part due to their antibiotic properties (Benoit and Starkey, Reference Benoit and Starkey1968; Field and Lettinga, Reference Field, Lettinga, Hemingway and Laks1992; Joanisse et al., Reference Joanisse, Bradley, Preston and Munson and2007; Triebwasser et al., Reference Triebwasser, Tharayil, Preston and Gerard2012), and to the formation of tannin–protein complexes (Adamczyk et al., Reference Adamczyk, Sietiö, Biasi and Heinonsalo2019). Dehydrogenase enzymatic activity was reported to be higher in O. viciifolia than M. sativa sown plots (Clemensen et al., Reference Clemensen, Villalba, Rottinghaus, Lee, Provenza and Reeve2020, Reference Clemensen, Villalba, Lee, Provenza, Duke and Reeve2022).

Atmospheric di-nitrogen fixation

Crop production is dependent on inorganic N and other fertilizers inputs to resupply nutrients lost as harvested grain and forage, via soil erosion/runoff, and by other natural or anthropogenic causes (Schlautman et al., Reference Schlautman, Barriball, Ciotir, Herron and Miller2018; Bibi and Rahman, Reference Bibi and Rahman2023). Nitrogen-fertilizers are one of the most monetary and environmentally expensive inputs in agricultural settings, which are currently more expensive than ever before (Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Rubio, Häner, Delgado, Lucho-Constantino, Islas-Valdez and Pellet2016; Adjesiwor and Islam, Reference Adjesiwor and Islam2016). The mobility of applied inorganic N fertilizers results in less than 50% fertilizer N-recovery efficiency by the first crop with substantial amounts of the remaining N leaving the cropping system as N2O and NO3 (Crews and Peoples, Reference Crews and Peoples2004; Ladha et al., Reference Ladha, Pathak, Krupnik, Six and van Kessel2005). Onobrychis species are soil enriching via the fixation of atmospheric N. The symbiosis between legumes and root-nodule bacteria supplies biologically fixed N to natural and agroecosystems around the globe (Crews, Reference Crews1993). This form of N is directly incorporated into the growing plant, overcoming problems of low fertilizer N-recovery efficiency. Onobrychis viciifolia is able to provide relief from reliance on synthetic N while supplying high forage quality in low-input agricultural ecosystems (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). While N2 fixation in legumes is considered to have higher energy and carbon requirements than N assimilation by plants using reduction of NO3 for growth, the energy is supplied via solar radiation rather than through fossil fuels; thus, the resulting CO2 respired by the nodules originates though photosynthesis and is not a net contributor to atmospheric CO2 concentrations (Crews and Peoples, Reference Crews and Peoples2004; Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Peoples, Boddey, Gresshoff, Henrik, Alves and Morrison2012).

Onobrychis species form symbioses with bacteria belonging to the genera Mesorhizobium, Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium (Baimiev et al., Reference Baimiev, Baimiev, Gubaidullin, Kulikova and Chemeris2007). In field conditions, Nitrogen deficiency symptoms were reported in O. viciifolia despite plants being abundantly nodulated, which indicates that the strain of N-fixing bacteria present was inefficient or short lived (Burton and Curley, Reference Burton and Curley1968; Schneiter et al., Reference Schneiter, Whitman and Larson1969), but these symptoms disappeared with time in plants nodulated by effective strains (Prévost et al., Reference Prévost, Bordeleau and Antoun1987a). Small young nodules are generally the most effective in O. viciifolia and are scarce in early stages of growth in the field (Burton and Curley, Reference Burton and Curley1968). In this sense, it seems likely that O. viciifolia is dependent on some mineral N at early growth stages and later growth stages benefit significantly from an effective symbiosis (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). However, the N-fixing system of O. viciifolia is very sensitive to low levels of nitrate under glasshouse conditions (Hume and Withers, Reference Hume and Withers1985). Onobrychis viciifolia can be cross inoculated by Rhizobium species isolated from different leguminous species (Burton and Curley, Reference Burton and Curley1968; Prévost et al., Reference Prévost, Bordeleau and Antoun1987a). Furthermore, inoculating O. viciifolia with rhizobia isolated from three arctic legume species improved biological nitrogen fixation during cold phases of the growing season (Prévost et al., Reference Prévost, Bordeleau and Antoun1987a, Reference Prévost, Bordeleau, Caudry-Reznick, Schulman and Antoun1987b). Based on acetylene reduction rates, the general effect of adding strains of Rhizobium to other strains of Rhizobium in symbiosis with O. viciifolia was additive (Hill, Reference Hill1980). Kong et al. (Reference Kong, Pei, Du, Sun and Zhang2014) demonstrated that the inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can improve mycorrhizal infection rate and plant growth, accelerating the absorption of water and nutrients by the roots compared with uninoculated plants. Kon (Reference Kon1980) established that O. viciifolia, when infected with the appropriate Rhizobium spp. and arbuscular fungi, produced more and larger nodules and, consequently, a greater nodule dry weight and exhibited greater N2 fixation than plants infected with only the rhizobia in a glasshouse conditions. Over two-year experiments, O. viciifolia fixed 106 kg N ha/year in rain-fed Mediterranean conditions, which was below the usual range of 130–160 kg N ha/year and quite far from the potential value of 270 kg N ha/year from non-Mediterranean areas (Provorov and Tikhonovich, Reference Provorov and Tikhonovich2003; Re et al., Reference Re, Piluzza, Sulas, Franca, Porqueddu, Sanna and Bullitta2014) (Table 1). Issah et al. (Reference Issah, Schoenau, Lardner and Knight2020) quantified biological N2 fixation using 15N isotope dilution and estimated resource partitioning in O. viciifolia under controlled conditions. The percentage of N derived from atmosphere was 81% corresponding to estimated N contributions of 65 kg N ha/year. In view of previous works, cultivating O. viciifolia would help mitigating climate change through the reduction of N fertilizers and related greenhouse gasses emissions. As well, the cultivation of O. viciifolia would support farmers on their efforts to cope with climate change and to face increasing costs of N fertilizers.

Table 1. Effective bacterial and mycorrhiza strains for Onobrychis viciifolia inoculation

Weed and pest control

Climate change is opening new geographic windows for disease outbreaks, insect herbivory and weed infestations in crops worldwide (Bajwa et al., Reference Bajwa, Farooq, Al-Sadi, Nawaz, Jabran and Siddique2020; Gullino et al., Reference Gullino, Albajes, Al-Jboory, Angelotti, Chakraborty, Garrett, Hurley, Juroszek, Lopian, Makkouk, Pan, Pugliese and Stephenson2022). The inclusion of O. viciifolia can reduce number and cover of weeds in cereal fields (Cirujeda et al., Reference Cirujeda, Marí, Murillo, Aibar, Pardo and Solé-Senan2019). Mummey and Ramsey (Reference Mummey and Ramsey2017) concluded that O. viciifolia may be a useful bridge species for improving soil conditions while allowing for weed control during restoration of invasive crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertmn.) stands, improving conditions for native species establishment in dry rangeland in North America. In addition, O. viciifolia can offer a multitude of ecosystem services by supporting biodiversity and hosting important enemies of crop pests in agricultural landscapes. For example, González et al. (Reference González, ŠtroblŠtrobl, Janšta, Hovorka, Kadlec and Knapp2022) found almost 147 morphospecies of hymenopteran parasitoids in O. viciifolia patches providing a low-cost strategy for biological pest control in Brassica napus L. fields. According to these studies, cultivating O. viciifolia would improve biological control of pests just when their impacts are growing due to climate change.

Honey production

The change in climatic conditions is bound to have an impact on the physiology, distribution and survival of bees (Le Conte and Navajas, Reference Le Conte and Navajas2008; Smoliński et al., Reference Smoliński, Langowska and Glazaczow2021). Under this scenario, conservation of honeybees remains a challenging task (Wood et al., Reference Wood, Michez, Paxton, Drossart, Neumann, Gérard, Vanderplanck, Barraud, Martinet, Leclercq and NJ2020). As O. viciifolia is self-sterile, it relies on flower visitors for cross-pollination and requires multiple visits to maximize pollination (Bogoyavlenskii, Reference Bogoyavlenskii1955, Reference Bogoyavlenskii1974; Kropacova and Haslbachova, Reference Kropacova and Haslbachova1969). Bee pollination of O. viciifolia gave an increase of seed productivity by more than 30% (Pankov, Reference Pankov2013). Consequently, its flowers are a rich source of pollen and nectar, attracting ten times more bees than Trifolium repens L. and M. sativa (Rosov, Reference Rosov1952; McGregor, Reference McGregor1976; Kells, Reference Kells2001; Deveci and Kuvanci, Reference Deveci and Kuvanci2012). Onobrychis viciifolia is visited by managed and indigenous pollinator insect species, including Apis, Bombus and Osmia in southern Alberta (Canada), Eastern Washington (USA), the British Isles (UK), Europe and Japan (Richards and Edwards, Reference Richards and Edwards1988; Horne, Reference Horne1995; Clement et al., Reference Clement, Griswold, Rus, Hellier and Stout2006; Howes, Reference Howes2007; USDA SARE, 2007; Westphal et al., Reference Westphal, Bommarco, Lamborn, Petanidou, Potts, Roberts, Szentgyörgyi, Vaissière, Woyciechowski and Steffan-Dewenter2008; Taki et al., Reference Taki, Okabe, Makino, Yamaura and Sueyoshi2009). Rozen et al. (Reference Rozen, Ozebek, Ascher, Sedivy, Praz, Monfared and Mueller2010) noted that O. viciifolia is the only pollen source for Osmia avosetta Warncke bees in Turkey. In addition, different studies have described a very diverse pollinator community, dominated by Bombus and different bee species, foraging on O. viciifolia in Italy, Canada, USA, Europe and Turkey (Ricciardelli d'Albore and Roscioni, Reference Ricciardelli D'Albore and Roscionii1990; Kells, Reference Kells2001; Clement et al., Reference Clement, Griswold, Rus, Hellier and Stout2006; Decourtye et al., Reference Decourtye, Mader and Desneux2010; Manino et al., Reference Manino, Patetta, Boglietti and Porporato2010; Özbek, Reference Özbek2011; Pearce et al., Reference Pearce, O'Neill, Miller and Blodgett2012; Richards, Reference Richards2019). Richards and Edwards (Reference Richards and Edwards1988) found that bumblebees visited O. viciifolia flowers at a much greater rate than western honeybees in Canada. As previously stated, O. viciifolia is a good nectar and pollen source for many pollinator species and, additionally, it shows a long-lasting flowering period to offer bee pasture for western honeybees (Apies mellifera L.). and wild bees (Szalai, Reference Szalai2001). In addition, weeds in O. viciifolia crops are mainly represented by melliferous species in Russia (Pankov, Reference Pankov2014). When grown as a forage crop, O. viciifolia is mown late so flowering has normally finished, maximizing its value as a bee forage crop (Ayers, Reference Ayers1993). With a reduced number of flowers per plant under drought, O. viciifolia maintained similar per-flower nectar production (Phillips et al., Reference Phillips, Shaw, Holland, EL, RD, JM and JL2018). Onobrychis viciifolia can yield up to 400 kg/ha of honey (Howes, Reference Howes2007) with a distinctive taste, smell, texture and colour (Vereshchagin et al., Reference Vereshchagin, Nickolay and Alexandra2015), which constitute an additional revenue (Pankov, Reference Pankov2012). Recently, it has been demonstrated that the caffeine present in the nectar of O. viciifolia reduces the infection of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) by the microsporidian parasite Nosema bombi Fantham and Porter (Folly et al., Reference Folly, Koch, Farrell, Stevenson and Brown2021). Growing O. viciifolia may promote a diversification of agronomic production with honeybee related products, which is key to stand the impacts of climate change (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Clair, Dolezal, Toth and O'Neal2022).

Erosion control

Global warming is expected to lead to a more vigorous hydrological cycle, including more total rainfall and more frequent torrential rainfall events, which may lead to higher soil erosion in many locations worldwide (Eekhout and de Vente, Reference Eekhout and de Vente2022; Dash and Maity, Reference Dash and Maity2023). Cover of O. viciifolia and Rosa canina L. provided year-round soil protection, improving the soil structure, increasing its water holding capacity and its nutrient retention in Northwest Turkey (Sariyildiz and Savaci, Reference Sariyildiz and Savaci2020). O. viciifolia enhanced soil productivity by increasing soil organic carbon, soil total N and soil organic carbon stock capacity (Sariyildiz and Savaci, Reference Sariyildiz and Savaci2020). Yu et al. (Reference Yu, Wei, Chen, Jia, Yang, Zhang and Feng2015) highlighted the superiority of O. viciifolia in water retention compared to different tree and herbaceous species in China. The structural stability of the soil under O. viciifolia continued for a long period and the infiltration rate was high, preventing an increase of runoff with time. Reduced-tillage systems coupled with O. viciifolia cropping should be considered as an efficient management practice and should be improved to withstand extreme rainfall conditions. When used as ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting with mulch, O. viciifolia offers farmers means to address drought, water loss and soil erosion in arable lands in arid and semiarid regions (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Li, Li and Sample2019b). Yüksek and Yüksek (Reference Yüksek and Yüksek2015) reported that plant cover of O. viciifolia was the main factor reducing surface runoff. Hairy leaves of O. viciifolia accumulate high sediment loads per leaf area, presumably, because hairs create a buffer zone of reduced water flow velocity enhancing sedimentation (Kretz et al., Reference Kretz, Seele, van der Plas, Weigelt and Wirth2020). O. viciifolia is used for erosion control in northwest China and Turkey (Turk and Celik, Reference Turk and Celik2006; Xu et al., Reference Xu, Gichuki, Shan and Li2006). Yakupoglu et al. (Reference Yakupoglu, Gundogan, Dindaroglu, Kusvuran, Gokmen, Rodrigo-Comino, Gyasi-Agyei and Cerdà2021) showed that O. viciifolia cultivation exhibited the lowest soil losses when compared to fallow and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Southern Turkey. O. viciifolia is an efficient cover crop in the conservation of soil and water, for example, in Mediterranean vineyards (Ben-Salem et al., Reference Ben-Salem, Álvarez and López-Vicente2018). According to these studies, cultivating O. viciifolia would reduce carbon emissions from soils since lowering erosion also reduces soil carbon dioxide emissions (Mandal et al., Reference Mandal, Giri and Srivastava2020; Ran et al., Reference Ran, Shi and Yang2021).

Ecological restoration

Ecological restoration is a major nature-based solution towards meeting a wide range of global development goals by improving food and water security, protecting biodiversity and promoting adaptation and mitigation of climate change (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Cui, Tian and Jia2020; Simonson et al., Reference Simonson, Miller, Jones, García-Rangel, Thornton and McOwen2021). The improvement of semi-arid and arid degraded lands is one of the most important uses of O. viciifolia, since leguminous crops naturally increase soil productivity due to their association with N fixing microbes (Singh et al., Reference Singh, Jaiswal, Krishna, Mukherjee and Verma2019). In this sense, Roy et al. (Reference Roy, Núñez-Delgado, Wang, Kader, Sarker, Hasan and Dindaroglu2021) suggested that O. viciifolia is suitable when designing an appropriate strategy for achieving a successful revegetation of coal mined areas. Moreover, Ibragimov et al. (Reference Ibragimov, Gamidov and Umakhanov2019) highlighted the importance of the cultivation of multi-component mixtures, including O. viciifolia, to face desertification in Southeast Russia.

Recently, there has been growing concern over the potential impacts of global climate change on the sensitivity of weeds to herbicides. Reduced glyphosate sensitivity is projected in response to climate change (Matzrafi et al., Reference Matzrafi, Brunharo, Tehranchian, BD and Jasieniuk2019). Crop tolerance to glyphosate can reduce competition from weeds, leading to potentially higher yields and increased efficiency in weed control (Raza et al., Reference Raza, Ali, Zaheer, Iqbal, Seleiman, Sattar, Ali, Khan, Arjumend and Chauhan2023). Onobrychis viciifolia is relatively tolerant to glyphosate application. Based on the dose estimated to cause 50% mortality (LD50), O. viciifolia seedlings are over six times, and mature plants are over 20 times, more tolerant to glyphosate than M. sativa. Based on the dose required to produce a 50% reduction in biomass yield (GR50), glyphosate has a 10-fold greater negative impact on M. sativa biomass yield than it does on O. viciifolia. In addition, the GR50 in O. viciifolia seedling was over two-fold and six-fold higher than M. sativa at the first and second harvests, respectively (Peel et al., Reference Peel, Ransom and Mott2013). However, no study has addressed the impact of glyphosate application on seed production. Hard seed levels vary considerably in O. viciifolia (up to 90%), and it appears to vary considerably with the cultivars (Bhattarai and Biligetu, Reference Bhattarai and Biligetu2018). Hard seed pod character may increase weediness of glyphosate tolerant O. viciifolia as reported for M. sativa (USDA, 2005) suggesting that O. viciifolia might pose weediness in ecological sensitive areas where it is not native and/or disperse into wild populations and persist in seed banks.

Glyphosate-resistant crops have become a significant part of cropping systems in North America while it remains used extensively in the mediterranean basin probably due to lawsuits and concerns about gene flow and impacts on organic agriculture (Putnam and Orloff, Reference Putnam and Orloff2013). Medicago sativa is a relatively recent crop to have glyphosate-resistant technology introduced. While weed control in sainfoin still a complex issue, O. viciifolia has not yet benefited from this technology. Given the low vigour of sainfoin, glyphosate resistant O. viciifolia offers new weed control options for sainfoin establishment for an improved long-term crop vigour and yield (McCordick et al., Reference McCordick, Hillger, Leep and Kells2008). Adopted this technology could encourage many growers to adopt sainfoin as an alternative forage for apparent improvements in crop safety, quality, profitability and herbicide application simplicity.

Nutritional interest and animal performance

Livestock production is a major and highly diverse component of agriculture that is being exposed to changes in climate impacting on forage and feed crop production (Moore and Ghahramani, Reference Moore and Ghahramani2013; Rojas-Downing et al., Reference Rojas-Downing, Nejadhashemi, Harrigan and Woznicki2017; Godde et al., Reference Godde, Mason, Mayberry, Thornton and Herrero2021). O. viciifolia has aroused renewed interest in its use in livestock diets, as it has important nutritional properties such as high palatability and great nutritional value leading to very satisfactory animal performance (Gayrard et al., Reference Gayrard, Gombault, Bretaudeau, Hoste and Gidenne2021). Scharenberg et al. (Reference Scharenberg, Arrigo, Gutzwiller, Soliva, Wyss, Kreuzer and Dohme2007a) found that the palatability of dried and ensiled O. viciifolia was 20–24% higher than that of grasses and 10–29% higher than for Trifolium pratense L. and M. sativa (Waghorn et al., Reference Waghorn, Jones, Shelton and McNabb1990). O. viciifolia hay was preferred to L. corniculatus hay by sheep (Scharenberg et al., Reference Scharenberg, Arrigo, Gutzwiller, Wyss, Hess, Kreuzer and Dohme2007b) and nonlactating cows (Scharenberg et al., Reference Scharenberg, Kreuzer and Dohme2009; Lagrange et al., Reference Lagrange, Beauchemin, MacAdam and Villalba2020). Contrary to forages like alfalfa, sainfoin is a non-bloating legume due to the presence of condensed tannins that attenuate the formation of biofilms in the rumen (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Berg, Barbieri, Veira and McAllister2006). In addition, condensed tannins attenuate the excessive accumulation of ammonia in the rumen through reductions in proteolysis (Lagrange et al., Reference Lagrange, Beauchemin, MacAdam and Villalba2020). Finally, sainfoin has been shown to contain high concentrations of non-structural carbohydrates that provide carbon skeletons for an efficient synthesis of microbial protein (Lagrange et al., Reference Lagrange, MacAdam and Villalba2021; Villalba et al., Reference Villalba, Ates and MacAdam2021). Collectively, these nutritional benefits contribute to explain the high preference for this forage displayed by ruminants. Mammalian herbivores base their dietary preferences on the association between the orosensorial properties of forages and their post-ingestive consequences (Provenza, Reference Provenza1995) and animals form strong preferences for forages that supply carbohydrates and nitrogen in amounts and proportions that satisfy their daily requirements (Villalba and Provenza, Reference Villalba and Provenza2000). In contrast, herbivores avoid feeds that enhance rumen distension such as those that induce bloat (Villalba et al., Reference Villalba, Provenza and Stott2009), as well as those forages that yield high concentrations of rumen ammonia (Villalba and Provenza, Reference Villalba and Provenza1997).

Onobrychis viciifolia can be grown as a monoculture or in mixtures with perennial grasses and M. sativa (Moyer, Reference Moyer1985; Goplen et al., Reference Goplen, Richards and Moyer1991; Frame et al., Reference Frame, Charlton and Laidlaw1998; Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). In recent years, the grazing of O. viciifolia as a monoculture, mixed with perennial grasses (Festuca pratensis Hudds. and P. pratense) or mixed with M. sativa has become a widespread practice in several regions of the world (Frame et al., Reference Frame, Charlton and Laidlaw1998; Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011; Biligetu et al., Reference Biligetu, Jefferson, Lardner and Acharya2021). Onobrychis viciifolia-grasses mixtures generally have higher yields and quality than grasses and O. viciifolia in monoculture. Liu et al. (Reference Liu, Lane and Davies2006) reported a forage yield of 9.1 t/ha of dry matter for a mixture of O. viciifolia-F. pratensis seeded in a ratio of 2:1 compared to the monoculture of O. viciifolia which gave 7.5 t/ha of dry matter. Onobrychis viciifolia can be used primarily as hay or grazed directly, but it can also be cut for silage (Bland, Reference Bland1971; Sheldrick et al., Reference Sheldrick, Thomson and Newman1987; Waghorn et al., Reference Waghorn, Douglas, Niezen, McNabb and AG1998).

The daily gain reported in heifers was 0.96 and 0.91 kg with O. viciifolia and M. sativa-grass hay, respectively (Parker and Moss, Reference Parker and Moss1981), and 0.80 and 0.67 kg for heifers on O. viciifolia and M. sativa pastures, respectively (Marten et al., Reference Marten, Ehle and Ristau1987). Thus, O. viciifolia has been reported as an excellent pasture plant (Bonciarelli and Coravelli, Reference Bonciarelli and Coravelli1963; Ferret, Reference Ferret1975; Bencivenga and Negri, Reference Bencivenga and Negri1983). When O. viciifolia was grazed as a sole diet, cows, and lambs liveweight gain was similar to T. repens and about 20% greater than for M. sativa (Waghorn, Reference Waghorn2008). Weight gains in beef cattle would be equivalent for O. viciifolia hay and that of M. sativa (Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Torelli, Lesperance, Speth, Cooper and Carleton1968), and in the case of pasture, the weight gains were higher for O. viciifolia compared to M. sativa (Hanna and Smoliak, Reference Hanna, Smoliak, Cooper and Carleton1968), explained by the lower incidence of bloat and higher efficiency of nitrogen retention due to the presence of tannins in the former (Lagrange et al., Reference Lagrange, Beauchemin, MacAdam and Villalba2020). Despite lower concentrate supplementation for grazing rabbits, O. viciifolia grassland yielded the highest daily mean growth rates (29 g/day) when compared to natural (26 g/day) and to a pure stand of Festuca arundinacea Schreber. (19.2 g/day). Thus, it seems possible to reduce complete feed supplementation without reducing animal performance (Martin et al., Reference Martin, Duprat, Goby, Theau, Roinsard, Descombes, Legendre and Gidenne2016; Legendre et al., Reference Legendre, Goby, Duprat, Gidenne and Martin2019). To achieve daily mean growth rates of 20 g/day, a grazing area of 0.4 m2/rabbit is sufficient when O. viciifolia is grazed while it should be increased to 0.65 m2/rabbit when grass and forbs are grazed (Legendre et al., Reference Legendre, Goby, Duprat, Gidenne and Martin2019).

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from livestock

The livestock sector plays an important role in climate change as it accounts for 15% of human-induced greenhouse gases emissions (Hur et al., Reference Hur, Kim, Yim, Yoon, Lee and Jo2024). Methane represents the second largest anthropogenic greenhouse-effect gas after carbon dioxide (CO2) (IPCC, Reference Masson-Delmotte, Zhai, Pirani, Connors, Péan, Berger, Caud, Chen, Goldfarb, Gomis, Huang, Leitzell, Lonnoy, Matthews, Maycock, Waterfield, Yelekçi, Yu and Zhou2021). Livestock, enteric fermentations or effluents, contributes about 1/3 of the global methane emissions (Saunois et al., Reference Saunois, Stavert, Poulter, Bousquet, Canadell, Jackson, Raymond, Dlugokencky, Houweling, Patra, PK, Arora, VK, Bergamaschi, Blake, DR, Bruhwiler, Carlson, KM, Castaldi, Chandra, Cevoisier, Crill, PM, Curry, CL, Frankenberg, Gedney, Hegglin, MI, Hugelius, Ishizawa, Ito, Janssens-Maenhout, Jensen, KM, Kleinen, Krummel, PB, RL, GG, Maksyutov, McDonald, KC, Miller, PA, JR, Müller, Murguia-Flores, Naik, Niwa, Noce, O'Doherty, Parker, RJ, Peng, Peters, GP, Prinn, Ramonet, Regnier, Riley, JW, JA, Simpson, IJ, Smith, SJ, LP, BF, Tohjima, Tubiello, FN, Viovy, Voulgarakis, Weber, TS, van der Werf, GR, RF, Wunch, Yin, Yoshida, Zhang, Zhang, Zhao, Zheng, Zhu, Zhu and Zhuang2020). From an environmental point of view, feeding ruminants with forage containing condensed tannins may offer potential benefits. Nitrogen balance studies performed on sheep fed with conserved O. viciifolia have shown a reduction in excretion of urinary N, whereas the opposite pattern was observed with M. sativa (Aufrere et al., Reference Aufrere, Dudilieu and Poncet2008; Theodoridou et al., Reference Theodoridou, Aufrere, Andueza, Pourrat, Le Morvan, Stringano, Mueller-Harvey and Baumont2010). Urinary N can pollute water resources through excessive nitrate levels (Hoste and Niderkorn, Reference Hoste and Niderkorn2019) and is quickly converted to nitrogen oxide, a greenhouse gas 298 times more potent than carbon dioxide (Vallero, Reference Vallero2019). Moreover, sheep fed O. viciifolia increased faecal N excretion, which contributes to organic matter accumulation more than urinary N (Aufrere et al., Reference Aufrere, Dudilieu and Poncet2008; Theodoridou et al., Reference Theodoridou, Aufrere, Andueza, Pourrat, Le Morvan, Stringano, Mueller-Harvey and Baumont2010), reducing N loses to the atmosphere. Condensed tannins contribute to shift the proportion of excreted N from urine to faeces (Stewart et al., Reference Stewart, Beauchemin, Dai, MacAdam, Christensen and Villalba2019; Lagrange et al., Reference Lagrange, Beauchemin, MacAdam and Villalba2020), given the capacity of tannins to bind proteins in the acidic rumen environment and release proteins at greater pH in the intestines for digestion and absorption (Mueller-Harvey et al., Reference Mueller-Harvey, Bee, Dohme-Meier, Hoste, Karonen, Kölliker, Lüscher, Niderkorn, Pellikaan, Salminen and Skøt2019). Enteric methane emissions, another greenhouse gas, were reduced in ruminants consuming O. viciifolia (Hatew et al., Reference Hatew, Hayot Carbonero, Stringano, Sales, Smith, Mueller-Harvey, Hendriks and Pellikaan2015, Reference Hatew, Stringano, Mueller-Harvey, Hendriks, Hayot-Carbonero, Smith and Pellikaan2016; Petrič et al., Reference Petrič, Komáromyová, Batťányi, Kozłowska, Filipiak, Łukomska, Ślusarczyk, Szumacher-Strabel, Cieślak, Várady, Kišidayová and Váradyová2022). This reduction depends on the phenological stage and the chemical composition of the biomass. In vitro, methane production in O. viciifolia hays showed a tendency to increase with the advancement of phenological stage. The best period to cut O. viciifolia for hay making was between early and late flowering, when the forage offers high organic matter digestibility, low methane production and more efficient microbial fermentation (Guglielmelli et al., Reference Guglielmelli, Calabro, Primi, Carone, Cutrignelli, Tudisco, Piccolo, Ronchi and Danieli2011). At flowering stage, in vitro gas and methane productions were cultivar dependant (Kaplan, Reference Kaplan2011; Ülger and Kaplan, Reference Ülger and Kaplan2016). Hatew et al. (Reference Hatew, Hayot Carbonero, Stringano, Sales, Smith, Mueller-Harvey, Hendriks and Pellikaan2015) suggested that conserved O. viciifolia accessions collected worldwide exhibited substantial variation in terms of their effects on rumen in vitro methane production, revealing some promising accessions for future investigations. Additionally, the methane yield depended on the chemical composition of the biomass (Amaleviciute-Volunge et al., Reference Amaleviciute-Volunge, Slepetiene and Butkute2020). The results obtained in metabolic cages indicated that the inclusion of O. viciifolia in silage reduces the digestibility of organic matter in vivo on castrated male sheep compared to pure timothy (Phleum pratense L.), and methane emissions were proportionately lower (Niderkorn et al., Reference Niderkorn, Copani and Ginane2016). A trial on dairy cows, including 50% O. viciifolia silage in a ration of grass silage, resulted in a reduction of 6.0% methane emissions per kg of dry matter ingested. Silage of O. viciifolia allowed improved milk in quantity and quality (Huyen et al., Reference Huyen, Fryganas, Uittenbogaard, Mueller-Harvey, Verstegen, Hendriks and Pellikaan2016a, Reference Huyen, Desrues, Alferink, Zandstra, Verstegen, Hendriks and Pellikaan2016b). The consumption of O. viciifolia pellets by gastrointestinal nematode-infected lambs decreased methane emission by affecting ruminal methanogens without undesirable changes in the ruminal microbiome or animals' health (Petrič et al., Reference Petrič, Komáromyová, Batťányi, Kozłowska, Filipiak, Łukomska, Ślusarczyk, Szumacher-Strabel, Cieślak, Várady, Kišidayová and Váradyová2022). Adding O. viciifolia into M. sativa prior to ensiling suppressed silage proteolysis and mitigated rumen CH4 in a proportion-dependent manner, with a minor negative effect on dry matter digestibility (Rufino-Moya et al., Reference Rufino-Moya, Blanco, Bertolín and Joy2019). Therefore, co-ensiling of M. sativa with O. viciifolia could be used as a promising strategy not only to produce high-quality legume silage but also to reduce N excretion and mitigate rumen CH4 (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Chen, Bai, Zhang, Su, Franco, Ding, Zhang, Zhang and Guo2022). Lower values of CH4 per kg intake were recorded with O. viciifolia silage compared to pure Phleum pratense L. silage (Niderkorn et al., Reference Niderkorn, Copani, Martin, Maxin, Torrent, Rochette and Ginane2019). Similar effects were observed in vitro when O. viciifolia was mixed with Lolium perenne L. or Dactylis glomerata L. (Niderkorn et al., Reference Niderkorn, Baumont, Le Morvan and Macheboeuf2011, Reference Niderkorn, Mueller-Harvey, Le Morvan and Aufrère2012) and in vivo when O. viciifolia was included in diets of dairy cows (Huyen et al., Reference Huyen, Fryganas, Uittenbogaard, Mueller-Harvey, Verstegen, Hendriks and Pellikaan2016a). The significant reduction of total digestive tract neutral detergent fibre digestibility in the presence of O. viciifolia compared to pure P. pratense was likely the main driver for the reduction of CH4 emissions. In addition, the acetate:propionate ratio in the rumen, which is strongly related to the availability of hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenic archaea to form CH4, was lower for P. pratense-O. viciifolia and Trifolium pratense-O. viciifolia than for pure P. pratense, highlighting the potential of O. viciifolia silage to decrease CH4 emissions via a modification of the fermentative microbial ecosystem in the rumen (Warner et al., Reference Warner, Bannink, Hatew, Van Laar and Dijkstra2017). In addition, the reduction of NH3 emissions and urea in milk were more pronounced than the reduction in methane emissions (McMahon et al., Reference McMahon, Majak, Mcallister, Hall, Jones, Popp and Cheng1999; Guglielmelli et al., Reference Guglielmelli, Calabro, Primi, Carone, Cutrignelli, Tudisco, Piccolo, Ronchi and Danieli2011; Niderkorn et al., Reference Niderkorn, Baumont, Le Morvan and Macheboeuf2011; Williams et al., Reference Williams, Moatea, Hannaha, Ribauxa, Wales and Eckard2011; Theodoridou et al., Reference Theodoridou, Aufrère, Niderkorn, Andueza, Le Morvan, Picard and Baumont2011; Chung et al., Reference Chung, Mc Geough, Acharya, McAllister, McGinn, Harstad and Beauchemin2013; Copani et al., Reference Copani, Ginane, Quereuil, Anglard and Niderkorn2015).

Nutritive value of sainfoin

The nutritional value of O. viciifolia is determined by variety, growth stage and growing environment. Several studies have quantified the nutritional values, mainly the concentrations of crude protein, neutral detergent fibre and acidic detergent fibre, of O. viciifolia at different stages of growth. After 42 days of regrowth, the nutritive value of O. viciifolia was comparable to the first growth vegetative stage, with crude protein ranging between 148–186 g/kg, and neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre concentration ranging 365–454 g/kg and 337–397 g/kg, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2. Nutritional value of Onobrychis viciifolia at different stages of growth

Freshly harvested forage, silage and hay of O. viciifolia have similar quality and nutritive value (Table 3). The tannins in O. viciifolia silage can reduce the proteolysis that takes place in the silo (Wilkins and Jones, Reference Wilkins and Jones2000). Incorporation of O. viciifolia into M. sativa forage improves fermentation in laboratory silos. Optimal ruminal fermentation with silage was obtained with a proportion of 60/40 for M. sativa and O. viciifolia, respectively (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Barbieri, Berg and McAllister2007). The inclusion of O. viciifolia in grass silage has been shown to improve forage quality, fermentation as well as protein protection against microbial and enzymatic degradation (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Scott, Tweed, Minchin and Davies2008; Lorenz et al., Reference Lorenz, Eriksson and Udén2010; Copani et al., Reference Copani, Le Morvan and Niderkorn2014). Onobrychis viciifolia can be offered as dehydrated granules (Gaudin, Reference Gaudin2017), but the necessary technological treatments, high temperature and high pressure, can cause a possible destruction of the tannins and a conversion of the tannins from the free majority form to the bound form attached to proteins (Terrill et al., Reference Terrill, Rowan, Douglas and Barry1992, Reference Terrill, Mosjidis, Moore, Shaik, Miller, Burke, Muir and Wolfe2007; Minnee et al., Reference Minnee, Woodward, Waghorn and Laboyrie2002; Lorenz, Reference Lorenz2011).

Table 3. Characteristics and nutritive value of Onobrychis viciifolia feeding forms

Onobrychis viciifolia was found to increase by 17% the proportion of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and unsaturated fatty acids in milk and cheese fat from lactating cattle (Girard et al., Reference Girard, Dohme-Meier, Wechsler, Kreuzer and Bee2015, Reference Girard, Dohme-Meier, Wechsler, Goy, Kreuzer and Bee2016), due to condensed tannins modulating the activity of bacteria involved in the processes of biohydrogenation (Vasta et al., Reference Vasta, Yáñez-Ruiz, Mele, Serra, Luciano, Lanza, Biondi and Priolo2010; Buccioni et al., Reference Buccioni, Pauselli, Viti, Minieri, Pallara, Roscini, Rapaccini, Marinucci, Lupi, Conte and Mele2015). In addition, it has been reported that condensed tannins of O. viciifolia reduced protein degradation in the rumen leading to reductions in rumen ammonia concentrations and N losses in urine (Scharenberg et al., Reference Scharenberg, Arrigo, Gutzwiller, Wyss, Hess, Kreuzer and Dohme2007b). Condensed tannins also increased the plasma concentration of essential amino acids, indicating that the protein escaped from the rumen is digested in the intestine leading to faster animal growth rates and increased milk production (Waghorn et al., Reference Waghorn, Jones, Shelton and McNabb1990; Waghorn, Reference Waghorn2008; Girard et al., Reference Girard, Dohme-Meier, Wechsler, Goy, Kreuzer and Bee2016).

Nutritional benefits

Onobrychis viciifolia is particularly valued for its content of condensed tannins, which have been shown to improve animal health by reducing bloat (McMahon et al., Reference McMahon, Majak, Mcallister, Hall, Jones, Popp and Cheng1999; Sottie, Reference Sottie2014; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Mcallister and Acharya2015), and by diminishing gastro-intestinal parasites (Hoste et al., Reference Hoste, Torres-Acosta, Sandoval-Castro, Mueller-Harvey, Sotiraki, Louvandini, Thamsborg and Terrill2015; Desrues et al., Reference Desrues, Mueller-Harvey, Pellikaan, Enemark and Thamsborg2017). In fact, the intake of O. viciifolia fresh leaves (10–20% of the dry matter of M. sativa) reduces bloat in cattle by 27% (McMahon et al., Reference McMahon, Majak, Mcallister, Hall, Jones, Popp and Cheng1999) compared to those consuming 100% M. sativa. Consequently, O. viciifolia could be grazed, offered in as hay or silage ad libitum. When O. viciifolia is grown in a mixture with M. sativa, it has been shown to reduce bloat incidence in beef cattle relative to the grazing of pure M. sativa (Sottie, Reference Sottie2014; Malisch et al., Reference Malisch, Lüscher, Baert, Engström, Studer, Fryganas, Suter, Mueller-Harvey and JP2015). Condensed tannins of O. viciifolia hay has shown reduced egg per gram of faeces, and female fertility of parasitic nematodes when fed to livestock (Azuhnwi et al., Reference Azuhnwi, Hertzberg, Arrigo, Gutzwiller, Hess, Mueller-Harvey, Torgerson, Kreuzer and Dohme-Meier2013; Arroyo-Lopez et al., Reference Arroyo-Lopez, Manolaraki, Saratsis, Saratsi, Stefanakis, Skampardonis, Voutzourakis, Hoste and Sotiraki2014). Anti-parasitic properties of O. viciifolia tannins have been demonstrated by both in vitro (Barrau et al., Reference Barrau, Fabre, Fouraste and Hoste2005) and in vivo studies (Molan et al., Reference Molan, Hoskin, Barry and McNabb2000a, Reference Molan, Waghorn, Min and McNabb2000b, Reference Molan, Waghorn and McNabb2002; Hoste et al., Reference Hoste, Torres-Acosta, Sandoval-Castro, Mueller-Harvey, Sotiraki, Louvandini, Thamsborg and Terrill2015). Moreover, sheep increase their intake of O. viciifolia through time when parasitized (Gaudin et al., Reference Gaudin, Costes-Thiré, Villalba, Hoste, Gerfault and Ginane2019) and show high preferences for the legume despite the high availability of alternative legumes without tannins like cicer milkvetch (Villalba et al., Reference Villalba, Miller, Hall, Clemensen, Stott, Snyder and Provenza2013).

Onobrychis viciifolia has an antiparasitic effect on the most important sheep nematodes (Ríos-De Álvarez et al., Reference Ríos-De Álvarez, Greer, Jackson, Athanasiadou, Kyriazakis and Huntley2008; Komáromyová et al., Reference Komáromyová, Mravčáková, Petrič, Kucková, Babják, Urda Dolinská, Königová, Maďarová, Pruszyńska-Oszmałek, Cieslak, Čobanová, Váradyová and Várady2021; Petrič et al., Reference Petrič, Komáromyová, Batťányi, Kozłowska, Filipiak, Łukomska, Ślusarczyk, Szumacher-Strabel, Cieślak, Várady, Kišidayová and Váradyová2022). Similar results were obtained with goats (Paolini et al., Reference Paolini, Prevot, Dorchies and Hoste2005). While goats are more willing than sheep to consume tanniferous feeds, the potential for self-medication has been demonstrated in both species concerning H. contortus (Gaudin et al., Reference Gaudin, Costes-Thiré, Villalba, Hoste, Gerfault and Ginane2019). Regular feeding on O. viciifolia pastures by small ruminants could therefore be used to improve host resilience and thus reduce pasture contamination. The anthelmintic bioactivity of O. viciifolia is maintained in hay or silage (Ojeda-Robertos et al., Reference Ojeda-Robertos, Manolaraki, Theodoridou, Aufrere, Halbwirth, Stich, Regos, Treutter, Mueller-Harvey and Hoste2010). Berard et al. (Reference Berard, Holley, McAllister, Ominski, Wittenberg, Bouchard, Bouchard and Krause2009) proved that O. viciifolia silage and hay reduced the excretion of Escherichia coli by cattle. The consumption of O. viciifolia by small ruminants has also been associated with effects on coccidia (Saratsis et al., Reference Saratsis, Regos, Tzanidakis, Voutzourakis, Stefanakis, Treuter, Joachim and Sotiraki2012) and on infestations by gastrointestinal nematodes (Hoste et al., Reference Hoste, Torres-Acosta, Sandoval-Castro, Mueller-Harvey, Sotiraki, Louvandini, Thamsborg and Terrill2015). These findings contribute to the further development of sustainable grass–legume systems, as evidence for the successful cultivation of O. viciifolia as an alternative legume species (Malisch et al., Reference Malisch, Suter, Studer and Lüscher2017).

Medicinal and pharmacological properties

Global environmental degradation and climate change threaten the foundation of human health and well-being (Pathak and McKinney, Reference Pathak and McKinney2021; Rocha et al., Reference Rocha, Oliveira, Viana, Ribeiro, Prata, Ribeiro and Rocha-Santos2022). Several diseases are all likely to become more common (Faergeman, Reference Faergeman2007). Ethnobotanical evidence supports the use of O. viciifolia in traditional medicine (Martini, Reference Martini1981; Mbaveng et al., Reference Mbaveng, Hamm and Kuete2014) (Table 4). Cornara et al. (Reference Cornara, Xiao and Burlando2016) recently reviewed temperate forage legumes as a resource for nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals. The nutraceutical activity of O. viciifolia is due to the presence of a large phenolic complex, dominated by arbutin, rutin, catechin, kaempferol, quercetin, afzelin and condensed tannins (Marais et al., Reference Marais, Mueller-Harvey, Brandt and Ferreira2000; Regos et al., Reference Regos, Urbanella and Treutter2009). These phenolic metabolites are reported as antioxidants, detoxifying agents, reducing blood pressure and anti-cancer agents (Dai and Mumper, Reference Dai and Mumper2010).

Table 4. Biological activity of Onobrychis viciifolia

Establishment characteristics

Climate change is predicted to causes significant changes in composition, establishment, growth and development of pastures and fodder crops (Sunil et al., Reference Sunil, Akshit, Sheoran, Satpal, Harender, Deepak, Sushil and Paras2020; Martins-Noguerol et al., Reference Martins-Noguerol, Moreno-Pérez, Pedroche, Gallego-Tévar, Cambrollé, Matías, Fernández-Rebollo, Martínez-Force and Pérez-Ramos2023). Ease of stand establishment is considered an important trait in perennial forage utilization under climate change. Onobrychis viciifolia establishment depends on soil characteristics, seeding (size, colour of tegument, milled vs unmilled) and weed competition. Onobrychis viciifolia seeds germinate rapidly and are easy to establish in the Brown, Dark Brown and Black soil zones of western Canada, as well as stony clay loam soils in UK (Goplen et al., Reference Goplen, Richards and Moyer1991; Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011).

The areal expansion of semiarid and subhumid zones under climate change will increase at the expense of the contraction of arid and humid zones (Li et al., Reference Li, Wu and Sexton2021a, Reference Li, Zhu, White, Wei and Wu2021b). Onobrychis viciifolia performs well over multitude of climatic areas. In the warm Mediterranean Basin, O. viciifolia is normally drilled either in early autumn or at the beginning of spring. Conversely, in colder areas like the UK, it is recommended to drill O. viciifolia between April and July (Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Torelli, Lesperance, Speth, Cooper and Carleton1968; Goplen et al., Reference Goplen, Richards and Moyer1991). Early sowing can improve the development of the plants due to the early development of roots (Nikola, Reference Nikola1998). Global warming due to climate change will expose plants and their seeds to novel climatic conditions and likely affect seed germination responses (Gremer et al., Reference Gremer, Chiono, Suglia, Bontrager, Okafor and Schmit2020; Mondoni et al., Reference Mondoni, Jiménez-Alfaro, Cavieres, Baskin and Baskin2022). Species with a wide range of temperature for germination could have a better adaptability to climate change (Bandara et al., Reference Bandara, Finch, Walck, SN and Havens2019). Although there is limited information available on its seed germination, O. viciifolia has a wide range of optimum temperature for germination, but it is normally advised to drill it between 10–27°C and never below 5°C (Carleton et al., Reference Carleton, Cooper and Wisner1968; Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Torelli, Lesperance, Speth, Cooper and Carleton1968; Smoliak et al., Reference Smoliak, Jonston and Hanna1972). There are conflicting views on the relative germination of milled and unmilled O. viciifolia seeds. Wiesner et al. (Reference Wiesner, Carleton and Cooper1968) reported a higher germination percentage for milled seeds, but no significant difference in germination among the two types was observed by Chen (Reference Chen1992). Noorbakhshian et al. (Reference Noorbakhshian, Nabipour, Meskarbashee and Amooaghaie2011) found improved germination and seedling vigour for O. viciifolia after removing the seed pods. Use of de-hulled seeds could provide staggered germination and thus cushion potential weather disturbances (Wiesner et al., Reference Wiesner, Carleton and Cooper1968; Chen, Reference Chen1992; Demdoum, Reference Demdoum2012). To enhance O. viciifolia germination and early establishment, several studies report the need for seed pod removal rather than seed scarification (Bhattarai and Biligetu, Reference Bhattarai and Biligetu2018). In addition, seedlings emerging from seeds with intact pod may have a high probability of fungal infestation (Alternaria and Fusarium spp.). Slow and non-uniform seedling growth and high weed infestations may be other limiting factors for sowing seeds with pods (Noorbakhshian et al., Reference Noorbakhshian, Nabipour, Meskarbashee and Amooaghaie2011).

Variation among O. viciifolia germplasm for seed size, seed weight and seed coat colour would enhance the species adoption by farmers under climate change. The germination percentage was higher for brown than green seeds as the former are physiologically mature (Thomson, Reference Thomson1938; Noorbakhshian et al., Reference Noorbakhshian, Nabipour, Meskarbashee and Amooaghaie2011). Brown seeds colouration has important functions in plants including a role in camouflage and thermoregulation, and protection against UV-radiation and pathogens (Roulin, Reference Roulin2014). Germination is also affected by seed size, which varies among O. viciifolia cultivars. Bhattarai and Biligetu (Reference Bhattarai and Biligetu2018) found that final germination was increased by seed pod removal but not with seed size. In O. viciifolia, the medium seed size class (1000-seed weight of 21 g) and the large seed size class (1000-seed weight of 28 g) had a final germination of 90%–93% at temperature of 25°C, but the small seed class (1000-seed weight of 12 g) had a final germination lower than 10% due to high degree of physical dormancy (Bhattarai and Biligetu, Reference Bhattarai and Biligetu2018). Cash and Ditterline (Reference Cash and Ditterline1996) reported that O. viciifolia seedlings emerged more rapidly from large seeds. The use of large fully mature seeds increases establishment success giving stronger plants, with more nodules and high rates of N2 fixation (Cash and Ditterline, Reference Cash and Ditterline1996). The seeding density of O. viciifolia depends upon seed size, soil type, soil moisture, purpose and method of seeding. There is almost no data available to confirm the effect of O. viciifolia seeding density on stand establishment, forage yield and other agronomic performance. To establish a population of 70–150 adult plants/m2 in the first year, authors recommend seed densities of 40–50 kg/ha of de-hulled seeds (or 80–120 kg/ha hulled seeds) (Sheldrick et al., Reference Sheldrick, Thomson and Newman1987; Frame et al., Reference Frame, Charlton and Laidlaw1998) at a depth of 1–2 cm in Canada (Hill, Reference Hill, Lane and Wilkinson1997). Conversely, in China, a depth of 4–5 cm was recommended (Chen, Reference Chen1992). The recommended row spacing is between 50–60 cm for a better stand establishment (Goplen et al., Reference Goplen, Richards and Moyer1991; Stevovic et al., Reference Stevovic, Stanisavljevic, Djukic and Djurovic2010).

It is recognized that weed pressure associated with climate change is a significant threat to crop production, either through increased temperatures, rainfall shift and elevated CO2 levels, but the current knowledge of these effects is very sparse (Ramesh et al., Reference Ramesh, Matloob, Aslam, Florentine and Chauhan2017; Munda et al., Reference Munda, Munda, BK, SR, Dey, Pradhan, CK, BC, Pathak, Chatterjee, Saha and Das2024). Onobrychis viciifolia is a non-aggressive crop during seedling establishment. Thus, weed control in the first year is important for good establishment and high forage production in subsequent years. In the first year of establishment, Moyer (Reference Moyer1985) found weeds made up 98% of dry matter yield in O. viciifolia fields without any weed control measures Lethbridge (Canada). Koivisto and Lane (Reference Koivisto and Lane2001) suggested using a non-competitive grass as a companion crop to aid in weed control in the establishment year. Chemical weed control in pure stands of O. viciifolia resulted in higher seed yield than stands with H. vulgare as a companion crop in Europe (Dimitrova, Reference Dimitrova2010).

Recent advances

Climate change has a substantial bearing on crop productivity and food security, and hence there is a need to develop resilience to mitigate climate change induced impacts in crop plants (Acevedo et al., Reference Acevedo, Pixley, Zinyengere, Meng, Tufan, Cichy, Bizikova, Isaacs, Ghezzi-Kopel and Porciello2020; FAO, 2020; Raj et al., Reference Raj, Roodbar, Brinkley and Wolfe2022). The challenge is to try to preserve the resilience of our ecosystems in the years to come, and to maintain food security by protecting important crop species and finding ways to increase their productivity. Despite O. viciifolia potential to tackle climate change adverse effects, the species is relatively understudied, and several aspects need to be addressed. In recent years, ‘HealthyHay’ (http://legumeplus.eu/healthyhay-project) and ‘LegumePlus’ (http://legumeplus.eu) projects conducted genetic analyses, agronomic, biological and chemical evaluations, nutritional analyses, environmental assessments and developed methodologies for screening for genetic improvement of 362 different O. viciifolia accessions across Europe. Nevertheless, there is no report of registration of new improved O. viciifolia cultivars from these large-scale research projects (Poudel et al., Reference Poudel, Bhattarai, Singer, Biligetu and Acharya2023). In 2000, a new breeding initiative of O. viciifolia focusing on improvement of the compatibility of O. viciifolia in M. sativa stands to reduce M. sativa bloat led to the creation of two new Canadian cultivars, namely AAC-Mountainview and AAC-Glenview released in 2015 and 2018, respectively (Poudel et al., Reference Poudel, Bhattarai, Singer, Biligetu and Acharya2023). AAC-Mountainview was derived from single-cycle selection under competition with M. sativa, whereas AAC-Glenview was selected for persistence in M. sativa stands, followed by improved grazing tolerance in a grazing trial. The variation in dry matter yield in both cultivars is low compared to the Romanian cultivar Splendid, but higher than the Kazakhstan cultivar Nova based on recent tests in Lethbridge (South Ouest Canada) in monocultures. Nevertheless, AAC-Mountainview and AAC-Glenview showed significant advantages over parents when seeded with M. sativa. These cultivars are successful, and demand for their seeds is increasing considerably (Poudel et al., Reference Poudel, Bhattarai, Singer, Biligetu and Acharya2023).

Overall, climate change has exemplified the need for continued research into crop environmental stress tolerance (Jing et al., Reference Jing, Liu, Zhang and Hou2024). Current updates and recent advances in the physiological, molecular and genetic perspectives of plant responses to environmental stresses may offer insights underlying these responses and how this pool of knowledge can be explored to develop plants for future climates (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Srivastava, Sytar and Penna2023). In recent years, there has been a growing focus on research endeavours aimed at enhancing the resilience of O. viciifolia to both abiotic and biotic stresses providing opportunity for climate change adaptation and mitigation. To address the challenge of establishing O. viciifolia in drought conditions, Irani et al. (Reference Irani, Majidi, Mirlohi, Zargar and Karami2015a) identified O. viciifolia plants that exhibited resilience to drought and displayed high yields. These plants were characterized by elevated foliar proline contents, presenting a potential physiological marker for screening drought tolerance for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Moreover, enhancing the activity of two crucial antioxidant enzymes, glutathione reductase (GR) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), can lead to successful breeding of O. viciifolia with improved drought tolerance (Beyaz, Reference Beyaz2019). On the other hand, the growth of O. viciifolia is constrained by powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni), with several tolerant accessions having been previously identified (Jafari et al., Reference Jafari, Rasoli, Tabaei-Aghdaei, Shanjani and Alizadeh2014; Alizadeh et al., Reference Alizadeh, Jafari, Sepahvand, Davazdahemami, Moeini, Normand Moaied and Naseri2021). Li et al. (Reference Li, Wu and Sexton2021a, Reference Li, Zhu, White, Wei and Wu2021b) investigated O. viciifolia seed response under saline conditions and offered valuable insights for advancing the establishment and cultivation of salt-tolerant O. viciifolia in saline lands in China. The challenges posed by environmental stresses may be influential in the reduced persistence of O. viciifolia. Therefore, forthcoming O. viciifolia breeding endeavours ought to prioritize the creation of cultivars resilient to both biotic and abiotic stressors.

Progress in enhancing the molecular characteristics of O. viciifolia has significantly trailed behind that of other forage legume species, primarily because of the limited genomic resources. While several genetic markers have been established for O. viciifolia (Kempf, Reference Kempf2016; Mora-Ortiz et al., Reference Mora-Ortiz, Swain, Vickers, Hegarty, Kelly, Smith and Skøt2016; Shen et al., Reference Shen, Chai, Zhou, Luo, Wang and Liu2019), and a complete chloroplast genome sequence has been recently disclosed (Jin et al., Reference Jin, Jiang, Yi and Pang2021), there is currently no existing reference nuclear genome sequence for this species. Progress in molecular improvement has been advancing in recent years, with the accumulation of transcriptomic data from various tissues across a limited number of genotypes (Kempf, Reference Kempf2016; Mora-Ortiz et al., Reference Mora-Ortiz, Swain, Vickers, Hegarty, Kelly, Smith and Skøt2016; Shen et al., Reference Shen, Chai, Zhou, Luo, Wang and Liu2019; Yin et al., Reference Yin, Zhou, Wang, Tran and Zhang2020; Jin et al., Reference Jin, Jiang, Yi and Pang2021; Qiao et al., Reference Qiao, Cheng, Zhang, Yan, Yi and Shi2021). Additionally, there has been an evaluation of microRNAs (miRNAs) in O. viciifolia cultivated at different altitudes (Yin et al., Reference Yin, Zhou, Wang, Tran and Zhang2020). Considering the growing interest in O. viciifolia, further advancements should continue to unfold in this sphere in the years ahead, contributing to the facilitation of breeding activities. Alongside the existing limited supply of genetic data for tetraploid O. viciifolia, there exists a notable lack of accessible biotechnological tools. This shortfall has impeded both functional genetic investigations and progress in advanced molecular breeding initiatives. There has been some advancement in this domain with the introduction of a transient virus-induced gene silencing method in O. viciifolia. This method has proven successful in downregulating the expression of the phytoene desaturase gene, signifying recent progress in the field.

Future perspectives

In the present review, O. viciifolia appears as a plant with high application potential with agronomic, ecological and economic interest in the present scenario of climate change. Advances in recent years have provided more opportunities for O. viciifolia to be considered as an alternative for farmers, particularly those interested in producing locally sourced protein and sustainable agricultural practices (Sheppard et al., Reference Sheppard, Cattani, Ominski, Biligetu, Bittman and McGeough2019). Although the agronomical and ecological potential of O. viciifolia have recently received due attention, its general biological and physiological attributes have not been well-investigated. Evaluating these basic facets may extend its cultivation and pave the way for novel applications in the present context of climate change (Sakhraoui et al., Reference Sakhraoui, Ltaeif, Sakhraoui, Rouz and Castillo2023). In this sense, research efforts on the ecology, stress tolerance and uses of O. viciifolia should be increased. Thus, use of both genetic manipulation and traditional breeding approaches will be required to develop salt-tolerant cultivars better able to cope with high salinities in marginal agriculture areas affected by salinization in the present climate change scenario.

In view of our review, there are mainly five deficiencies in the research on O. viciifolia and its relationship with climate change: (1) Most of the studies on O. viciifolia ecophysiology have been focused on seedlings, while research concerning adult plants is scarce. Plant physiological characteristics often show differences in different growth stages, so the seedling stage may not represent the physiological characteristics of the whole plant life cycle (Mganga et al., Reference Mganga, Razavi, Sanaullah and Kuzyakov2019). Therefore, the research on physiological responses to environmental stressors related to climate change should be carried out for different growth stages of O. viciifolia, especially adult plants. (2) The studies on stress tolerance of O. viciifolia have been mainly focused on salt and drought tolerance, while the research on the responses to other environmental stressors, such as extremes of air temperatures, are scarce or non-existent. Therefore, more research is needed on the responses of O. viciifolia to different environmental stressors related to climate change, besides salinity and drought, and on the interactive effects of the combination of different environmental stresses. (3) The study of stress tolerance mechanism has been mainly focused on the observation of physiological changes, while the research on anatomical, morphological and genetic adaptation mechanisms is scarce. To further clarify the stress resistance of O. viciifolia to stressors related to climate change, anatomical, morphological and genetic studies should be conducted. Covering these knowledge gaps and their incorporation in hybridization and breeding programs can be useful in creating new cultivars of O. viciifolia better adapted to climate change. (4) Onobrychis viciifolia is relatively resistant to biotic stresses compared to other forage legume species and appears to rely on cultivar choices and thus represent a potential source for breeding (Carbonero et al., Reference Carbonero, Mueller-Harvey, Brown and Smith2011). This resistance will need to be confirmed by further rigorous field pathology studies to determine the susceptibility of selected lines, and the potential resistance mechanism should be studied to see if it is possible to transfer this into new cultivars. (5) The evaluations of ecological and economic benefits and impact of O. viciifolia production are mostly qualitative, lacking quantitative evaluations. This may limit farmers and the decision-making departments of public administrations to pay attention to its application values. Therefore, quantitative analysis should be carried out in the evaluation of ecological and economic benefits of O. viciifolia. (6) There is a lack of long-term observation experiments after sowing pastures with O. viciifolia or using this legume in ecological restoration projects. This sort of long-term studies would be a great opportunity to improve our knowledge on the benefits of O. viciifolia as a biological tool to mitigate and adapt to climate change. (7) The genomes of O. viciifolia have not yet been fully sequenced, and a limited number of genetic markers are present, except for some transcriptomics data to apply in crop improvement studies and functional genomics (Kempf, Reference Kempf2016; Mora-Ortiz et al., Reference Mora-Ortiz, Swain, Vickers, Hegarty, Kelly, Smith and Skøt2016; He et al., Reference He, Tian, Li, Wang, Wang, Wang, Zang, He, Zhang, Yun, Zhang, Jiang, Jia and Zhang2024). In fact, recent breeding studies on O. viciifolia have led to improvements in this crop as bloat-free forage legume by enhancing its yield, biomass productivity, grazing tolerance and fatty acid composition (Subedi, Reference Subedi2018; Wijekoon et al., Reference Wijekoon, Acharya, Siow, Sura, Thandapilly and Sabra2021). However, only a few O. viciifolia cultivars are available and new cultivars with high dry matter yield and persistence under regional growing conditions are required (Bhattarai et al., Reference Bhattarai, Coulman and Biligetu2016; Sheppard et al., Reference Sheppard, Cattani, Ominski, Biligetu, Bittman and McGeough2019). Further breeding studies are necessary on the improvements in weed control, establishment, seed dormancy and genetic characterisation to enable effective pre-breeding programmes in different environments.

Conclusions

Onobrychis viciifolia is a forage legume of renewed interest worldwide, with equally weighted advantages and disadvantages that prevent many farmers from considering this crop a viable alternative to other forage legumes. However, advances in recent years have provided more opportunities for sainfoin to be considered as an alternative choice for farmers, particularly for its agronomical and ecological interests, nutritional benefits and nutraceutical proprieties. However, some knowledge gaps and application should be studied deeply to promote O. viciifolia use for climate change adaptation and mitigation. In this sense, research is required to select and breed potentially useful varieties combining nutritional, agronomic and environmental potential.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Laboratory of Agricultural Production Systems and Sustainable Development (LR03AGR02) of the Higher School of Agriculture of Mograne, University of Carthage.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, A. S., J. M. C. and S. R.; methodology, A. S., H. B. L., A. S., J. M. C., J. J. V. and S. R.; validation, J. M. C., J. J. V. and S. R.; formal analysis, J. M. C., J. J. V. and S. R.; investigation, A. S., H. B. L., A. S., J. M. C., J. J. V. and S. R.; writing – original draft preparation, A. S., H. B. L., and A. S.; writing – review and editing, J. M. C., J. J. V. and S. R.; visualization, J. M. C., and S. R.; supervision, J. M. C., and S. R.

Funding statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Abou-El-Enain, MM (2002) Chromosomal criteria and their phylogenetic implications in the genus Onobrychis Mill. sect. Lophobrychis (Leguminosae), with special reference to Egyptian species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 139, 409414. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00075.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acevedo, M, Pixley, K, Zinyengere, N, Meng, S, Tufan, H, Cichy, K, Bizikova, L, Isaacs, K, Ghezzi-Kopel, K and Porciello, J (2020) A scoping review of adoption of climate-resilient crops by small-scale producers in low- and middle-income countries. Nature Plants 6, 12311241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00783-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adamczyk, B, Karonen, M, Adamczyk, S, Engström, MT, Laakso, T, Saranpää, P, Kitunen, V, Smolander, A and Simon, J (2017) Tannins can slow-down but also speed-up soil enzymatic activity in boreal forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 107, 6067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamczyk, B, Sietiö, O-M, Biasi, C and Heinonsalo, J (2019) Interaction between tannins and fungal necro mass stabilizes fungal residues in boreal forest soils. New Phytologist 223, 1621. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adjesiwor, AT and Islam, MA (2016) Rising nitrogen fertilizer prices and projected increase in maize ethanol production: the future of forage production and the potential of legumes in forage production systems. Grassland Science 62, 203212. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akram, NA, Shafiq, F and Ashraf, M (2018) Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): a prospective legume crop to offer multiple health benefits under changing climate. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 17, 13251338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alizadeh, MA, Jafari, AA, Sepahvand, K, Davazdahemami, S, Moeini, MR, Normand Moaied, F and Naseri, B (2021) Evaluation of sainfoin accessions exposed to powdery mildew disease at four locations in Iran. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales 9, 97108. https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(9)97-108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Turki, TA, Davy, AJ, Al-Ammari, BS and Basahi, MA (2022) Seed germination characteristics of some medicinally important desert plants from the Arabian Peninsula. Journal of Arid Environments 198, 104689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaleviciute-Volunge, K, Slepetiene, A and Butkute, B (2020) Methane yield of perennial grasses as affected by the chemical composition of their biomass. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 107, 243248. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2020.107.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amirahmadi, A, Kazempour-Osaloo, S, Moein, F, Kaveh, A and Maassoumi, AA (2014) Molecular systematics of the tribe Hedysareae (Fabaceae) based on nrDNA ITS and plastid trnL-F and matK sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300, 729747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0916-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C (2016) Alternative forage. Sainfoin, fenugreek: Not your everyday feed. Available at https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2016/03/23/sainfoin-fenugreekeveryday-feedGoogle Scholar
Angevain, M and Prosperi, JM (1995) Les Sainfoins ou le Genre Onobrychis. In Prosperi, JM, Guy el, P and Balfourier, F (eds), Ressources Génétiques des Plantes Fourragères et â Gazon. Paris: BRG/INRA, pp. 169175.Google Scholar
Arroyo-Lopez, C, Manolaraki, F, Saratsis, A, Saratsi, K, Stefanakis, A, Skampardonis, V, Voutzourakis, N, Hoste, H and Sotiraki, S (2014) Anthelmintic effect of carob pods and sainfoin hay when fed to lambs after experimental trickle infections with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Parasite, 21, 2171. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2014074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asci, OO (2011) Salt tolerance in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) seedlings. African Journal of Biotechnology 10, 87748781. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.596Google Scholar
Aufrere, J, Dudilieu, M and Poncet, C (2008) In vivo and in situ measurements of the digestive characteristics of sainfoin in comparison with Lucerne fed to sheep as fresh forages at two growth stages and as hay. Animal 2, 13311339. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731108002450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avci, S and Kaya, MD (2013) Seed and germination characteristics of wild Onobrychis taxa in Turkey. Turk Tarim ve Ormancilik Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 37, 555560. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1211-29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avci, S, Ilhan, E, Erayman, M and Sancak, C (2014) Analysis of Onobrychis genetic diversity using SSR markers from related legume species. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 24, 556566.Google Scholar
Ayers, GS (1993) Return of information about sainfoin. American Bee Journal 133, 257259.Google Scholar
Azuhnwi, BN, Thomann, B, Arrigo, Y, Boller, B, Hess, HD, Kreuzer, M and Dohme-Meier, F (2012) Ruminal dry matter and crude protein degradation kinetics of five sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) accessions differing in condensed tannin content and obtained from different harvests. Animal Feed Science and Technology 177, 135143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azuhnwi, BN, Hertzberg, H, Arrigo, Y, Gutzwiller, A, Hess, HD, Mueller-Harvey, I, Torgerson, P, Kreuzer, M and Dohme-Meier, F (2013) Investigation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) cultivar differences on nitrogen balance and fecal egg count in artificially infected lambs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 23422354. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baimiev, AK, Baimiev, AK, Gubaidullin, II, Kulikova, OL and Chemeris, AV (2007) Bacteria closely related to Phyllobacterium trifolii according to their 16S rRNA gene are discovered in the nodules of Hungarian sainfoin. Russian Journal of Genetics 43, 587590. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795407050146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajwa, AA, Farooq, M, Al-Sadi, AM, Nawaz, A, Jabran, K and Siddique, KHM (2020) Impact of climate change on biology and management of wheat pests. Crop Protection 137, 105304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakala, HS, Mandahal, S, Sarao, LK and Srivastava, P (2021) Breeding wheat for biotic stress resistance: achievements, challenges and prospects. In Mahmood-ur-Rahman Ansari (Ed.), Current Trends Wheat Research (Chap. 2). London, UK: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97359Google Scholar
Bal, MA, Ozturk, D, Aydin, R, Erol, A, Ozkan, CO, Ata, M, Karakas, E and Karabay, P (2006) Nutritive value of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia) harvested at different maturity stages. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 9, 205209. http://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.205.209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandara, RG, Finch, J, Walck, JL, SN, Hidayati and Havens, K (2019) Germination niche breadth and potential response to climate change differ among three North American perennials. Folia Geobotanica 54, 517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-019-09347-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrau, E, Fabre, N, Fouraste, I and Hoste, H (2005) Effect of bioactive compounds from Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) on the in vitro larval migration of Haemonchus contortus: role of tannins and flavonol glycosides. Parasitology 131, 531538. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182005008024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaumont, NJ, Austen, MC, Atkins, JP, Burdon, D, Degraer, S, TP, Dentinho, Derous, S, Holm, P, Horton, T, van Eerland, E, AH, Marboe, Starkey, D, Townsend, M and Zarzycki, T (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54, 253265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beladi, M, Habibi, D, Kashani, A, Paknejad, F and Nooralvandi, T (2011) Phytoremediation of lead and copper by sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): role of antioxidant enzymes and biochemical biomarkers. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 10, 440449.Google Scholar
Benaiges, C (1971) La esparceta. Madrid, España: Ministerio de Agricultura.Google Scholar
Bencivenga, M and Negri, V (1983) Le leguminose dei pascou umbri. Revue Agronomie 2, 315326.Google Scholar
Benoit, RE and Starkey, RL (1968) Enzyme inactivation as a factor in the inhibition of decomposition of organic matter by tannins. Soil Science 105, 203208. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196804000-00001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Salem, N, Álvarez, S and López-Vicente, M (2018) Soil and water conservation in rainfed vineyards with common sainfoin and spontaneous vegetation under different ground conditions. Water 10, 1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berard, NC, Holley, RA, McAllister, TA, Ominski, KH, Wittenberg, KM, Bouchard, KS, Bouchard, JJ and Krause, DO (2009) Potential to reduce Escherichia coli shedding in cattle feces by using sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) forage, tested in vitro and in vivo. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75, 10741079. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00983-08CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyaz, R (2019) Biochemical responses of sainfoin shoot and root tissues to drought stress in in vitro culture. Legume Research 42, 173177. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-460Google Scholar
Beyaz, R and Yildiz, M (2021) Influence of peg-induced drought stress on antioxidant components of callus tissue of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) ecotypes. Legume Research 44, 197201. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-556Google Scholar
Beyaz, R, Sancak, C, Yildiz, C, Kuşvuran, S and Yildiz, M (2016) Physiological responses of the M1 sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop) plants to gamma radiation. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 118, 7379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.09.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyaz, R, Sancak, C and Yildiz, M (2018) Morphological and biochemical responses of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) ecotypes to salinity. Legume Research 41, 253258. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-353Google Scholar
Bhattarai, S and Biligetu, B (2018) Effects of seed size, seed pod removal and temperature on seed germination of Onobrychis viciifolia. Seed Science and Technology 46, 113117. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2018.46.1.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattarai, S, Coulman, B and Biligetu, B (2016) Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): renewed interest as a forage legume for Western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 96, 748756. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2015-0378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibi, F and Rahman, A (2023) An overview of climate change impacts on agriculture and their mitigation strategies. Agriculture 13, 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biligetu, B, Jefferson, PG, Lardner, HA and Acharya, SN (2021) Evaluation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) for forage yield and persistence in sainfoin–alfalfa (Medicago sativa) mixtures and under different harvest frequencies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 101, 525535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, BF (1971) Crop Production: Cereals and Legumes. London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 431444.Google Scholar
Bogoyavlenskii, SG (1955) Bees and sainfoin. Pchelovodstvo Mosk 32, 1014.Google Scholar
Bogoyavlenskii, SG (1974) The multiplicity of visits to sainfoin by honey bees and its importance for the yields of seeds. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Pollination, pp. 121–127.Google Scholar
Bolat, İ (2019) Microbial biomass, basal respiration, and microbial indices of soil in diverse croplands in a region of northwestern Turkey (Bartın). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191, 695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7817-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, TP and Matches, AG (1990) Water use efficiency and yield of sainfoin and alfalfa. Crop Science 30, 143148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonciarelli, F and Coravelli, G (1963) Primi risultati di prove spenmentalt sul migrioramento dei pascoli dell’ appennino umbri. Ann. Fec. Agr. Un/v. Perugia. 18, 203216.Google Scholar
Böttger, JA, Bundy, CS, Oesterle, N and Hanson, SF (2013) Phylogenetic analysis of the alfalfa weevil complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in North America. Journal of Economic Entomology 106, 426436. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC12262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buccioni, A, Pauselli, M, Viti, C, Minieri, S, Pallara, G, Roscini, V, Rapaccini, S, Marinucci, MT, Lupi, P, Conte, G and Mele, M (2015) Milk fatty acid composition, rumen microbial population, and animal performances in response to diets rich in linoleic acid supplemented with chestnut or quebracho tannins in dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 11451156. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bungener, P, Balls, GR, Nussbaum, S, Geissmann, M, Grub, A and Fuhrer, J (1999) Leaf injury characteristics of grassland species exposed to ozone in relation to soil moisture condition and vapour pressure deficit. New Phytologist 142, 271282. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00390.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, JC and Curley, RL (1968) Nodulation and nitrogen fixation in sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa LAM.) as influenced by strains of rhizobia. Sainfoin Symposium, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
Cammarano, D, Ceccarelli, S, Grando, S, Romagosa, I, Benbelkacem, A, Akar, T, Al-Yassin, A, Pecchioni, N, Francia, E and Ronga, D (2019) The impact of climate change on barley yield in the Mediterranean basin. European Journal of Agronomy 106, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonero, CH, Mueller-Harvey, I, Brown, TA and Smith, L (2011) Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): a beneficial forage legume. Plant Genetic Resources 9, 7085. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262110000328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonero, CH, Carbonero, F, Smith, LMJ and Brown, TA (2013) Cytological characterization of the underutilized forage crop Onobrychis viciifolia Scop. and other members of the Onobrychis genus. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60, 19871996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-9967-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carleton, AE, Cooper, CS and Wisner, LE (1968) Effect of seed pod and temperature on speed of germination and seedling elongation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop.). Agronomy Journal 60, 8184. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000010026xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, SD and Ditterline, RL (1996) Seed size effects on growth and N-2 fixation of juvenile sainfoin. Field Crops Research 46, 145151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(95)00096-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, B (1992) Sainfoin. Lanzhou, China: Gansun Sci-tech Press ed.Google Scholar
Chu, L, Gao, Y, Chen, L, McCullough, PE, Jespersen, D, Sapkota, S, Bagavathiannan, M and Yu, J (2022) Impact of environmental factors on seed germination and seedling emergence of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Agronomy 12, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, YH, Mc Geough, EJ, Acharya, S, McAllister, TA, McGinn, SM, Harstad, OM and Beauchemin, KA (2013) Enteric methane emission, diet digestibility, and nitrogen excretion from beef heifers fed sainfoin or alfalfa. Journal of Animal Science 91(10), 48614874. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cirujeda, A, Marí, AI, Murillo, S, Aibar, J, Pardo, G and Solé-Senan, XO (2019) May the inclusion of a legume crop change weed composition in cereal fields? Example of sainfoin in Aragon (Spain). Agronomy 9, 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9030134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, SL, Griswold, TL, Rus, RW, Hellier, BC and Stout, DM (2006) Bee associates of flowering Astragalus and Onobrychis genebank accessions at a Snake River site in Eastern Washington. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 79, 254260. https://doi.org/10.2317/0505.02.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemensen, AK, Villalba, JJ, Rottinghaus, GE, Lee, ST, Provenza, FD and Reeve, JR (2020) Do plant secondary metabolite-containing forages influence soil processes in pasture systems? Agronomy Journal 112, 37443757. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemensen, A, Villalba, JJ, Lee, S, Provenza, F, Duke, S and Reeve, J (2022) How do tanniferous forages influence soil processes in forage cropping systems? Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management 8, e20166. https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, BI, Mankin, JS and Anchukaitis, KJ (2018) Climate change and drought: from past to future. Current Climate Change Reports 4, 164179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0093-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copani, G, Le Morvan, GCA and Niderkorn, V (2014) Bioactive forage legumes as a strategy to improve silage quality and minimise nitrogenous losses. Animal Production Science 54, 18261829. http://doi.org/10.1071/AN14252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copani, G, Ginane, C, Quereuil, A, Anglard, F and Niderkorn, V (2015) Benefit of Including Bioactive Legumes (Sainfoin, Red Clover) in Grass-Based Silages on Ruminant Production and Pollutant Emissions (PhD thesis). Université Blaise Pascal, Vet Agro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Clermont-Ferrand, France.Google Scholar
Cornara, L, Xiao, J and Burlando, B (2016) Therapeutic potential of temperate forage legumes: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 56, 149161. http://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1038378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crews, TE (1993) Phosphorus regulation of nitrogen fixation in a traditional Mexican agroecosystem. Biogeochemistry 21, 141166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crews, TE and Peoples, MB (2004) Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 102, 279297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, J and Mumper, RJ (2010) Plant phenolics: extraction, analysis and their antioxidant and anticancer properties. Molecules 15, 73137352. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15107313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dash, SS and Maity, R (2023) Effect of climate change on soil erosion indicates a dominance of rainfall over LULC changes. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 47, 101373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101373Google Scholar
Decourtye, A, Lecompte, P, Pierre, J, Chauzat, MP and Thiébeau, P (2007) Introduction de jachères florales en zones de grandes cultures – ou comment mieux concilier agriculture et biodiversité, et par conséquent, l'apiculture. Le Courrier de l'Environnement de l'INRA 54, 3356.Google Scholar
Decourtye, A, Mader, E and Desneux, N (2010) Landscape enhancement of floral resources for honey bees in agro-ecosystems. Apidologie 41, 264277. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2010024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Falco, E, Landi, G and Basso, F (2000 a) Production and quality of the sainfoin forage (Onobrychis viciefolia Scop.) as affected by cutting regime in a hilly area of southern Italy. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes 45, 275279.Google Scholar
De Falco, E, Landi, G and Basso, F (2000 b) Production and quality of the sainfoin forage (Onobrychis viaiaefolia Scop.) as affected by cutting regime in a hilly area of southern Italy. In Sulas, L (ed.), Legumes for Mediterranean Forage Crops, Pastures and Alternative Uses. Zaragoza: CIHEAM, pp. 275279. (Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 45). 10. Meeting of the Mediterranean Sub-Network of the FAO-CIHEAM Inter-Regional Cooperative Research and Development Network on Pastures and Fodder Crops, 2000/04/04-09, Sassari (Italy). http://om.ciheam.org/om/pdf/c45/00600211.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dehabadi, SRMH (1997) Biological point of view of water conservation under dryland condition. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Rainwater Catchment Systems, Vols 1 And 2. Soil Conservation & Watershed Management Research Center, pob 13445–1136, Tehran, Iran, pp. 840–847.Google Scholar
Dehabadi, SRMH, Kemp, PD, Barker, DJ and Hodgson, J (1993 a) A comparison of sainfoin cultivars and lucerne, with an emphasis on sainfoin responses to water stress. Proceedings Agronomy Society of New Zealand 23, 6367.Google Scholar
Dehabadi, SRMH, Kemp, PD, Barker, DJ and Hodgson, J (1993 b) Adaptation of sainfoin cultivars and lucerne to water stress. Proceedings of the XVII International Grassland Congress, pp. 158–159.Google Scholar
Deléglise, C, Meisser, M, Mosimann, E, Spiegelberger, T, Signarbieux, C, Jeangros, B and Buttler, A (2015) Drought-induced shifts in plant traits, yields and nutritive value under realistic grazing and mowing managements in a mountain grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 213, 94104. https://doi.org/10.1016/jagee.2015.07.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demdoum, S (2012) Caracterización agronómica y composición química de una colección de variedades de Esparceta (PhD thesis). Universidad de Lleida, Spain.Google Scholar
Demirci, S and Özhatay, N (2012) An ethnobotanical study in Kahramanmaraş (Turkey); wild plants used for medicinal purpose in Andirin, Kahramanmaraş. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 9, 7592.Google Scholar
Desrues, O, Mueller-Harvey, I, Pellikaan, WF, Enemark, HL and Thamsborg, SM (2017) Condensed tannins in the gastrointestinal tract of cattle after sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) kinIntake and their possible relationship with anthelmintic effects. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65, 14201427. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05830CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deveci, M and Kuvanci, A (2012) Investigation of pollen preferences of honeybee. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 11, 12651269. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2012.1265.1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, T (2010) Effect of weeds and some methods for their control in seed production stands of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). Pesticides Phytomedicine (Belgrade) 25, 163170. https://doi.org/10.2298/PIF1002163DGoogle Scholar
Dontas, I, Halabalaki, M, Moutsatsou, P, Mitakou, S, Papoutsi, Z, Khaldi, L, Raptou, P, Galanos, A and Lyritis, GP (2006) Protective effect of plant extract from Onobrychis ebenoides on ovariectomy induced bone loss in rats. Maturitas 53, 234242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.05.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, MP, Griffin, JH, Bagheri, V and Dorow, RL (1984) Correlations between catalytic reactions of diazo compounds and stoichiometric reactions of transition-metal carbenes with alkenes. Mechanism of the cyclopropanation reaction. Organometallics 3, 5361. https://doi.org/10.1021/om00079a011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drinkwater, LE and Snapp, SS (2007) Nutrients in agroecosystems: rethinking the management paradigm. Advances in Agronomy 92, 163186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92003-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East, JD, Monier, E, Saari, RK and Garcia-Menendez, F (2024) Projecting changes in the frequency and magnitude of ozone pollution events under uncertain climate sensitivity. Earth's Future 12, e2023EF003941. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eekhout, JPC and de Vente, J (2022) Global impact of climate change on soil erosion and potential for adaptation through soil conservation. Earth-Science Reviews 226, 103921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eken, C, Demirci, E and Dane, E (2004) Species of Fusarium on sainfoin in Erzurum, Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 261263. http://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2004.9513593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Sabagh, A, Islam, MS, Skalicky, M, Ali Raza, M, Singh, K, Anwar Hossain, M, Hossain A, Mahboob W, Iqbal M, Ratnasekera D, Singhal RK, Ahmed S, Kumari A, Wasaya A, Sytar O, Brestič M, Çığ F, Erman M, Habib ur Rahman M, Ullah N and Arshad A (2021) Salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the changing climate: adaptation and management strategies. Frontiers in Agronomy 3, 661932. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.661932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faergeman, O (2007) Climate change and preventive medicine. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation 14, 726729. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f30097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falistocco, E (1991) Chromosome study and genome relationships in perennial species of Onobrychis. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 45, 2532.Google Scholar
FAO (2020) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets. Rome: FAO. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/ca9692en/ca9692en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Feng, X, Thompson, SE, Woods, R and Porporato, A (2019) Quantifying asynchronicity of precipitation and potential evapotranspiration in Mediterranean climates. Geophysical Research Letters 46. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, CSS, Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S, Destouni, G, Ghajarnia, N and Kalantari, Z (2022) Soil degradation in the European Mediterranean region: processes, status and consequences. Science of the Total Environment 805, 150106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferret, M (1975) Comportement des espèces et variétés fourragères autres que la luzerne en zone méditerranéenne. Fourrages 64, 103114.Google Scholar
Field, J and Lettinga, G (1992) Toxicity of tannic compounds to microorganisms. In Hemingway, RW and Laks, PE (eds), Plant Polyphenols (Basic life sciences vol. 59). New York, NY: Springer, pp. 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3476-1_39Google Scholar
Folly, AJ, Koch, H, Farrell, IW, Stevenson, PC and Brown, MJF (2021) Agrienvironment scheme nectar chemistry can suppress the social epidemiology of parasites in an important pollinator. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 288, 20210363. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, J (2005) Forage Legumes for Temperate Grasslands. Enfield, NH: FAO, Science Publishers, Inc., 309pp.Google Scholar
Frame, J, Charlton, JFL and Laidlaw, AS (1998) Temperate Forage Legumes. Great Britain: CAB International.Google Scholar
García Salmerón, J, Montserrat, P, Buendía, F, Ruiz-del-Castillo, A and Allue, J (1966) Studies of Botany, Ecology, Biology and Pascology of the Principal Existing Species in the Spontaneous Pasture-Grounds of Mountains of our Semiarid Regions. Madrid, España: Instituto Forestal de Investigaciones y Experiencias. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00343.xGoogle Scholar
Gaudin, E (2017) Le sainfoin déshydraté: Un modèle de nutricament dans la lutte contre les nématodes parasites des petits ruminants (Thèse d, France: Université INP Toulouse). soutenue le 16 mai 2017.Google Scholar
Gaudin, E, Costes-Thiré, M, Villalba, JJ, Hoste, H, Gerfault, V and Ginane, C (2019) Relative abilities of young sheep and goats to self-medicate with tannin-rich sainfoin when infected with gastrointestinal nematodes. Animal 13, 14981507. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111800304XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gayrard, C, Gombault, P, Bretaudeau, A, Hoste, H and Gidenne, T (2021) Nutritive value of dehydrated sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) for growing rabbits, according to the harvesting stage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 279, 114995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, M, Dohme-Meier, F, Wechsler, D, Kreuzer, M and Bee, G (2015) Comparison of effects of forage containing condensed tannins on milk and cheese quality. Proceedings of the 66th meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP), 31st Aug to 4th Sep, Warsaw, Poland, p. 375.Google Scholar
Girard, M, Dohme-Meier, F, Wechsler, D, Goy, D, Kreuzer, M and Bee, G (2016) Ability of 3 tanniferous forage legumes to modify quality of milk and Gruyère-type cheese. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 205220. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9952CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godde, CM, Mason, DD, Mayberry, DE, Thornton, PK and Herrero, M (2021) Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain; a review of the evidence. Global Food Security 28, 100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldblatt, P (1981) Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975–1978. Monog Syst Botan. 5. Saint Louis Missouri. 553p.Google Scholar
González, E, ŠtroblŠtrobl, M, Janšta, P, Hovorka, T, Kadlec, T and Knapp, M (2022) Artificial temporary non-crop habitats support parasitoids on arable land. Biological Conservation 265, 109409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goplen, BP, Richards, KW and Moyer, JR (1991) Sainfoin for Western Canada. Ottawa, ON: Agriculture Canada Publication, 1470/E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gremer, JR, Chiono, A, Suglia, E, Bontrager, M, Okafor, L and Schmit, J (2020) Variation in the seasonal germination niche across an elevational gradient: the role of germination cueing in current and future climates. American Journal of Botany 107(2), 350363. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guglielmelli, A, Calabro, S, Primi, R, Carone, F, Cutrignelli, MI, Tudisco, R, Piccolo, G, Ronchi, B and Danieli, PP (2011) In vitro fermentation patterns and methane production of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) hay with different condensed tannin contents. Grass and Forage Science 66, 488500. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00805.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullino, ML, Albajes, R, Al-Jboory, I, Angelotti, F, Chakraborty, S, Garrett, KA, Hurley, BP, Juroszek, P, Lopian, R, Makkouk, K, Pan, X, Pugliese, M and Stephenson, T (2022) Climate change and pathways used by pests as challenges to plant health in agriculture and forestry. Sustainability 14, 12421. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, MR and Smoliak, S (1968) Sainfoin yield evaluation ln Canada. In Cooper, CS and Carleton, AE (eds), « Sainfoin Symposium », Vol. 627. Montana Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin, Montana, Agric. Exp. Stn., Bozeman, MT, pp. 38–13.Google Scholar
Harris, JA, Hobbs, RJ, Higgs, E and Aronson, J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14, 170176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00136.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatew, B, Hayot Carbonero, C, Stringano, E, Sales, LF, Smith, LMJ, Mueller-Harvey, I, Hendriks, WH and Pellikaan, WF (2015) Diversity of condensed tannin structures affects rumen in vitro methane production in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) accessions. Grass and Forage Science 70, 474490. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatew, B, Stringano, E, Mueller-Harvey, I, Hendriks, WH, Hayot-Carbonero, C, Smith, LMJ and Pellikaan, WF (2016) Impact of variation in structure of condensed tannins from sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on in vitro ruminal methane production and fermentation characteristics. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 100, 348360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12336CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, J, Tian, D, Li, X, Wang, X, Wang, T, Wang, Z, Zang, H, He, X, Zhang, T, Yun, Q, Zhang, R, Jiang, J, Jia, S and Zhang, Y (2024) A chromosome-level genome assembly for Onobrychis viciifolia reveals gene copy number gain underlying enhanced proanthocyanidin biosynthesis. Communications Biology 7, 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05754-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, JM, Rubio, G, Häner, LL, Delgado, JA, Lucho-Constantino, CA, Islas-Valdez, S and Pellet, D (2016) Emerging and established technologies to increase nitrogen use efficiency of cereals. Agronomy 6, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6020025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, NS (1980) An Evaluation of Factors Affected by Nitrogen Fixation in Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop) (Master thesis). Montana State University, Bozeman, 35pp.Google Scholar
Hill, R (1997) Sainfoin: the not quite forgotten legume. In Lane, GPF and Wilkinson, JM (eds), Alternative Forages for Ruminants. Cirencester: Papers, Conference, pp. 5559.Google Scholar
Horne, M (1995) Pollen preference and its relationship to nesting success of Megachile rotundata (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88, 862867. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/88.6.862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoste, H and Niderkorn, V (2019) Le sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) et la chicorée (Cichorium intybus): deux modèles de plantes bioactives pour répondre aux défis agroécologiques en élevage de ruminants. Fourrages, Association Française pour la Production Fourragère 238, 171180.Google Scholar
Hoste, H, Torres-Acosta, JFJ, Sandoval-Castro, CA, Mueller-Harvey, I, Sotiraki, S, Louvandini, H, Thamsborg, SM and Terrill, TH (2015) Tannin containing legumes as a model for nutraceuticals against digestive parasites in livestock. Veterinary Parasitology 212, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, FN (2007) Plants and Beekeeping. London: Faber & Faber, p. 260.Google Scholar
Huang, Z, Liu, Y, Tian, FP and Wu, GL (2020) Soil water availability threshold indicator was determined by using plant physiological responses under drought conditions. Ecological Indicators 118, 106740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, LJ and Withers, NJ (1985) Nitrogen fixation in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) 1. responses to changes in nitrogen nutrition. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 325335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1985.10430435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunady, I, Ondriskova, V, Hutyrova, H, Kubikova, Z, Hammerschmiedt, T and Mezera, J (2021) Use of wild plant species: a potential for methane production in biogas plants. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research 11, 920–932.Google Scholar
Hur, S, Kim, J, Yim, D, Yoon, Y, Lee, S and Jo, C (2024) Impact of livestock industry on climate change: case study in South Korea – a review. Animal Bioscience 37, 405418. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.23.0256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, J (1966) Land and Human Population. Nature 211, 10531055. https://doi.org/10.1038/2111053a0Google Scholar
Huyen, N, Fryganas, C, Uittenbogaard, G, Mueller-Harvey, I, Verstegen, M, Hendriks, W and Pellikaan, W (2016 a) Structural features of condensed tannins affect in vitro ruminal methane production and fermentation characteristics. The Journal of Agricultural Science 154, 14741487. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyen, NT, Desrues, O, Alferink, SJJ, Zandstra, T, Verstegen, MWA, Hendriks, WH and Pellikaan, WF (2016 b) Inclusion of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) silage in dairy cow rations affects nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, energy balance, and methane emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 35663577. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibragimov, KM, Gamidov, IR and Umakhanov, MA (2019) Productivity of Hungarian sainfoin in two and three-component grass mixtures for vegetative reclamation on Kizlyar grasslands. Feed Production 7, 2327.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2021) Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. In Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai, P, Pirani, A, Connors, SL, Péan, C, Berger, S, Caud, N, Chen, Y, Goldfarb, L, Gomis, MI, Huang, M, Leitzell, K, Lonnoy, E, Matthews, JBR, Maycock, TK, Waterfield, T, Yelekçi, O, Yu, R and Zhou, B (eds), Contribution of Working Group to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, p. 2391.Google Scholar
Irani, S, Majidi, MM, Mirlohi, A, Zargar, M and Karami, M (2015 a) Assessment of drought tolerance in sainfoin: physiological and drought tolerance indices. Agronomy Journal 107, 1771. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irani, S, Majidi, MM, Mirlohi, A, Karami, M and Zargar, M (2015 b) Response to drought stress in sainfoin: within and among ecotype variation. Crop Science 55, 18681880. http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issah, G, Schoenau, JJ, Lardner, HA and Knight, JD (2020) Nitrogen fixation and resource partitioning in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), Cicer Milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) and Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) using 15N enrichment under controlled environment conditions. Agronomy 10, 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISTAT (2013) Dati annuali sulle coltivazioni. [Online]. Roma: ISTAT. Available at http://agri.istat.it (19 March 2013).Google Scholar
Jafari, AA, Rasoli, M, Tabaei-Aghdaei, SR, Shanjani, PS and Alizadeh, MA (2014) Evaluation of herbage yield, agronomic traits and powdery mildew disease in 35 populations of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) across 5 environments of Iran. Romanian Agricultural Research 31, 41–48.Google Scholar
Jensen, EH, Torelli, CR, Lesperance, AI and Speth, CF (1968) Evaluation of sainfoin and alfalfa with beef cattle. In Cooper, CS and Carleton, AE (eds), « Sainfoin Symposium », Vol. 627. Montana Agriculture Experiment Station Publications: Bulletin, pp. 100101.Google Scholar
Jensen, ES, Peoples, MB, Boddey, RM, Gresshoff, PM, Henrik, HN, Alves, BJR and Morrison, MJ (2012) Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 329364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0056-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Y, Xu, Z, Zhou, G and Tao, L (2016) Elevated CO2 can modify the response to a water status gradient in a steppe grass: from cell organelles to photosynthetic capacity to plant growth. BMC Plant Biology 16, 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0846-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Z, Jiang, W, Yi, D and Pang, Y (2021) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 6, 496498. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2020.1871439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jing, Z, Liu, N, Zhang, Z and Hou, X (2024) Research progress on plant responses to stress combinations in the context of climate change. Plants 13, 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joanisse, GD, Bradley, RL, Preston, CM and Munson and, AD (2007) Soil enzyme inhibition by condensed litter tannins may drive ecosystem structure and processes: the case of Kalmia angustifolia. New Phytologist 175, 535546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02113.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadri, A, Chaabena, A, Abdelguerfi, A and Laouar, M (2021) Influence of salinity on germination and early seedling root growth traits of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) landraces collected in Southern Algerian oases. Agriculture and Natural Resources 55, 976985. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2021.55.6.08Google Scholar
Kallenbach, RL, Matches, AG and Mahan, JR (1996) Sainfoin regrowth declines as metabolic rate increases with temperature. Crop Science 36, 9197. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600010017xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M (2011) Determination of potential nutritive value of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) hays harvested at flowering stage. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 10, 20282031. http://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2011.2028.2031Google Scholar
Karakoca, K, Asan-Ozusaglam, M, Cakmak, YS and Teksen, M (2015) Phenolic compounds, biological and antioxidant activities of Onobrychis armena Boiss. & huet flower and root extracts. Chiang Mai Journal of Science 42, 376392.Google Scholar
Karamian, R and Asadbegy, M (2016) Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of three Onobrychis Species from Iran. Pharmaceutical Sciences 22, 112119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamian, R and Ataei-Barazande, S (2013) Effect of salinity on some growth parameters in three Onobrychis species (Fabaceae) in Iran. Iraniain Journal of Plant Biology 5, 6981.Google Scholar
Karatassiou, M, Noitsakis, B and Koukoura, Z (2009) Drought adaptation ecophysiological mechanisms of two annual legumes on semi-arid Mediterranean grassland. Scientific Research and Essay 4, 493500.Google Scholar
Kells, A (2001) Sainfoin: an alternative forage crop for bees. Bee World 82, 192194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2001.11099526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempf, K (2016) Self-Fertilization and Marker-Trait Associations in Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). PhD thesis, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany. ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
Khalilvandi-Behroozyar, H, Dehghan-Banadaky, M and Rezayazdi, K (2010) Palatability, in situ and in vitro nutritive value of dried sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). The Journal of Agricultural Science 148, 723733. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintl, A, Huňady, I, Vymyslický, T, Ondrisková, V, Hammerschmiedt, T, Brtnický, M and Elbl, J (2021) Effect of seed coating and PEG-induced drought on the germination capacity of five clover crops. Plants 10, 724. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, DW, Dotzenko, AD and Hinze, GO (1972) Influence of three systems on the yield, water use efficiency, and forage quality of sainfoin. Agronomy Journal 64, 463467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, JM and Lane, GPF (2001) Sainfoin-Worth another Look. Forage Matters 6.Google Scholar
Komainda, M, Küchenmeister, K, Küchenmeister, F, Breitsameter, L, Wrage-Mönnig, N, Kayser, M and Isselstein, J (2019) Forage legumes for future dry climates: lower relative biomass losses of minor forage legumes compared to Trifolium repens under conditions of periodic drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 205, 460469. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komáromyová, M, Mravčáková, D, Petrič, D, Kucková, K, Babják, M, Urda Dolinská, M, Königová, A, Maďarová, M, Pruszyńska-Oszmałek, E, Cieslak, A, Čobanová, K, Váradyová, Z, Várady, M (2021) Effects of medicinal plants and organic selenium against ovine haemonchosis. Animals 11(5), p. 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kon, KF (1980) Dual Mutualistic Associations in Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) (Master of Agricultural Science in Agronomy). New Zealand: Massey University.Google Scholar
Kong, J, Pei, Z, Du, M, Sun, G and Zhang, X (2014) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the drought resistance of the mining area repair plant Sainfoin. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 24, 485489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.05.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretz, L, Seele, C, van der Plas, F, Weigelt, A and Wirth, C (2020) Leaf area and pubescence drive sedimentation on leaf surfaces during flooding. Oecologia 193, 535545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04664-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kropacova, S and Haslbachova, H (1969) Study of the honey bee foraging on sainfoin plants (Onobrychis viciaefolia, Thell). Proceedings of the 22nd International Apicultural Congress, Munich, pp. 476–477.Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Srivastava, AK, Sytar, O and Penna, S (2023) Editorial: plants for future climate: responses and adaptations to combined, multifactorial, and sequential stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science 14, 1290649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1290649CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladha, JK, Pathak, H, Krupnik, TJ, Six, J and van Kessel, C (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Advances in Agronomy 87, 85156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)87003-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagrange, S, Beauchemin, KA, MacAdam, J and Villalba, JJ (2020) Grazing diverse combinations of tanniferous and non-tanniferous legumes: implications for beef cattle performance and environmental impact. Science of the Total Environment 746, 140788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140788CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagrange, SP, MacAdam, JW and Villalba, JJ (2021) The use of temperate tannin containing forage legumes to improve sustainability in forage-livestock production. Agronomy 11, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R (2012) Climate change and soil degradation mitigation by sustainable management of soils and other natural resources. Agricultural Research 1, 199212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-012-0031-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Conte, Y and Navajas, M (2008) Climate change: impact on honey bee populations and diseases. Revue scientifique et technique-Office International des Epizooties 27, 499510.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, MRF, Scott, MB, Tweed, JKS, Minchin, FR and Davies, DR (2008) Effects of polyphenol oxidase on lipolysis and proteolysis of red clover silage with and without a silage inoculant (Lactobacillus plantarum L54). Animal Feed Science and Technology 144, 125136. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, H, Goby, JP, Duprat, A, Gidenne, T and Martin, G (2019) Herbage intake and growth of rabbits under different pasture type, herbage allowance and quality conditions in organic production. Animal 13, 495501. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731118001775CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Houérou, HN (1969) La végétation de la Tunisie steppique (1) (Structure, écologie, sociologie, répartition, évolution, utilisation, biomasse, productivité) (avec référence aux végétations analogues d'Algérie, de Libye et du Maroc). Annales de l'Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de la Tunisie 42, 622.Google Scholar
Lesk, C, Rowhani, P and Ramankutty, N (2016) Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature 529, 8487. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16467CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, RSHIF, Fukuda, K and Yang, Y (2010) Effects of salt and alkali stresses on germination, growth, photosynthesis and ion accumulation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 56, 725733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00506.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M, Wu, P, Sexton, DMH, and Ma Z (2021 a) Potential shifts in climate zones under a future global warming scenario using soil moisture classification. Climate Dynamics 56, 20712092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05576-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, SJ, Zhu, YH, White, JF, Wei, M and Wu, GQ (2021 b) Two sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) cultivars differ in their responses to neutral and saline-alkali stress during seed germination and early seedling growth. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 19, 42994311. http://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1906_42994311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z, Lane, GPF and Davies, WP (2006) The effects of establishment method on the yield of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) and sainfoin –grass mixtures. Proceedings of British Grassland Society 8th Research Conference.Google Scholar
Liu, Z, Baines, RN, Lane, GPF and Davies, WP (2010) Survival of plants of common sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) in competition with two companion grass species. Grass and Forage Science 65, 1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2009.00714.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, XL, Hao, YQ, Jin, L, Xu, ZJ, McAllister, TA and Wang, Y (2013) Anti-Escherichia coli O157:H7 properties of purple prairie clover and sainfoin condensed tannins. Molecules 18, 21832199. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18022183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, JG, Cui, WH, Tian, Z and Jia, JL (2020) Theory of stepwise ecological restoration. Chinese Science Bulletin 66, 10141025. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2020-1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, JM (2005) Tribe Hedysarae. In Lewis, G, Schrire, B, Mackinder, B and Lock, M (eds), Legumes of the World. Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens, pp. 489495.Google Scholar
Lock, JM and Simpson, K (1991) Legumes of West Asia, a Check-List. Kew: Royal Bot. Gardens.Google Scholar
Lorenz, M (2011) Sainfoin Tannins and Their Impact on Protein Degradation During Silage and Rumen Fermentation and Testing of Novel Techniques. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Lorenz, M, Eriksson, T and Udén, P (2010) Effect of wilting, silage additive, PEG treatment and tannin content on the distribution of N between different fractions after ensiling of three different sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) varieties. Grass and Forage Science 65, 175184. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00736.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabberley, DJ (1997) The Plant Book. A Portable Dictionary of the Vascular Plants, 2nd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mabberley, DJ (2008) The Plant-Book. A Portable Dictionary of the Higher Plants, 3rd Edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Majidi, MM and Barati, M (2011) Methods for breaking seed dormancy in one cultivated and two wild Onobrychis species. Seed Science and Technology 39, 4453. http://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2011.39.1.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malisch, CS, Lüscher, A, Baert, N, Engström, MT, Studer, B, Fryganas, C, Suter, D, Mueller-Harvey, T and JP, Salminen (2015) Large variability of proanthocyanidin content and composition in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 63, 1023410242. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04946CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malisch, CS, Salminen, JP, Kölliker, R, Engström, M, Suter, D, Studer, B and Lüscher, A (2016) Drought effects on proanthocyanidins in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) are dependent on the plant's ontogenetic stage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64, 93079316. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malisch, CS, Suter, D, Studer, B and Lüscher, A (2017) Multifunctional benefits of sainfoin mixtures: effects of partner species, sowing density and cutting regime. Grass and Forage Science 72, 794805. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandal, D, Giri, N and Srivastava, P (2020) The magnitude of erosion-induced carbon (C) flux and C-sequestration potential of eroded lands in India. European Journal of Soil Science 71, 151168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manino, A, Patetta, A, Boglietti, G and Porporato, M (2010) Bumble bees of the Susa Valley (Hymenoptera Apidae). Bulletin of Insectology 63, 137152.Google Scholar
Marais, JP, Mueller-Harvey, I, Brandt, EV and Ferreira, D (2000) Polyphenols, condensed tannins, and other natural products in Onobrychis viciifolia (Sainfoin). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48, 34403447. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000388hCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March-Salas, M, van Kleunen, M and Fitze, PS (2021) Effects of intrinsic precipitation-predictability on root traits, allocation strategies and the selective regimes acting on them. Oikos, 2022(1), e07970. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.07970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marten, GC, Ehle, FR and Ristau, EA (1987) Performance andphotosensitization of cattle related to forage quality offour legumes. Crop Science 27, 138145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G, Duprat, A, Goby, JP, Theau, JP, Roinsard, A, Descombes, M, Legendre, H and Gidenne, T (2016) Herbage intake regulation and growth of rabbits raised on grasslands: back to basics and looking forward. Animal 10, 16091618. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116000598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martini, E (1981) La fitoterapia popolare in Val Borbera (Appennino Ligure). Webbia 35, 187205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.1981.10670218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins-Noguerol, R, Moreno-Pérez, AJ, Pedroche, J, Gallego-Tévar, B, Cambrollé, J, Matías, L, Fernández-Rebollo, P, Martínez-Force, E and Pérez-Ramos, IM (2023) Climate change alters pasture productivity and quality: impact on fatty acids and amino acids in Mediterranean silvopastoral ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 358, 108703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathre, D (1968) Disease in sainfoin. In Cooper, CS and Carleton, AE (eds), Sainfoin Symposium, Vol. 627. Montana Agriculture Experiment Station Publications: Bulletin, pp. 6566.Google Scholar
Matzrafi, M, Brunharo, C, Tehranchian, P, BD, Hanson and Jasieniuk, M (2019) Increased temperatures and elevated CO2 levels reduce the sensitivity of Conyza canadensis and Chenopodium album to glyphosate. Scientific Reports 9, 2228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38729-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mbaveng, AT, Hamm, R and Kuete, V (2014) Harmful and protective effects of terpenoids from African medicinal plants. In Victor Kuete (ed.), Toxicological Survey of African Medicinal Plants. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 557576. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-15406-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCordick, SA, Hillger, DE, Leep, RL and Kells, JJ (2008) Establishment systems for glyphosate-resistant alfalfa. Weed Technology 22, 2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, SE (1976) Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants, Chapter 4 in ‘Legumes and Some Relatives’. USDA Agriculture Handbook, 496, pp. 93–98. Available at http://gears.tucson.ars.ag.gov/book/Google Scholar
McMahon, LR, Majak, W, Mcallister, TA, Hall, JW, Jones, GA, Popp, JD and Cheng, KJ (1999) Effect of sainfoin on in vitro digestion of fresh alfalfa and bloat in steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 203212. https://doi.org/10.4141/A98-074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabi, HR and Chaichi, MR (2012) Effect of Seed Coating Methods on Germination Speed of Onobrychis sativa at Different Drought Stress Levels and Sowing Depths. International Conference on Future Environment and Energy IPCBEE vol. 28 (2012) © (2012). Singapore: IACSIT Press.Google Scholar
Mercier, JF, Tracy, BL, d'Amours, R, Chagnon, F, Hoffman, I, Korpach, EP, Johnson, S and Ungar, RK (2009) Increased environmental gamma-ray dose rate during precipitation: a strong correlation with contributing air mass. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 100(7), 527533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mganga, KZ, Razavi, BS, Sanaullah, M and Kuzyakov, Y (2019) Phenological stage, plant biomass, and drought stress affect microbial biomass and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of Enteropogon macrostachyus. Pedosphere 29, 259265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(18)60799-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Retrieved 14 October 2009 from http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdfGoogle Scholar
Miller, DA and Hoveland, CS (1995) Other Temperate Legumes. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Minnee, EMK, Woodward, SL, Waghorn, GC and Laboyrie, PG (2002) The effect of ensiling forage legumes on condensed tannins. Agronomy New Zealand 32/33, 117119.Google Scholar
Molan, AL, Hoskin, SO, Barry, TN and McNabb, WC (2000 a) Effect of condensed tannins extracted from four forages on the viability of the larvae of deer lungworms and gastrointestinal nematodes. Veterinary Record 147, 4448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molan, AL, Waghorn, GC, Min, BM and McNabb, WC (2000 b) The effect of condensed tannins from seven herbages on Trichostrongylus colubriformis larval migration in vitro. Folia Parasitologica 47, 3944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molan, AL, Waghorn, GC and McNabb, WC (2002) Effect of condensed tannins on egg hatching and larval development of Trichostrongylus colubriformis in vitro. Veterinary Record 150, 6569. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.150.3.65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondal, S (2021) Impact of climate change on soil fertility. In Choudhary, DK, Mishra, A and Varma, A (eds), Climate Change and the Microbiome. Soil Biology, Vol. 63. Cham: Springer, pp. 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76863-8_28Google Scholar
Mondoni, A, Jiménez-Alfaro, B and Cavieres, LA (2022) Chapter 1 – effect of climate change on plant regeneration from seeds in the Arctic and alpine biome. In Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (eds), Plant Regeneration from Seeds. United States: Academic Press, pp. 318. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823731-1.00007-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, AD and Ghahramani, A (2013) Climate change and broadacre livestock production across southern Australia. 1. impacts of climate change on pasture and livestock productivity, and on sustainable levels of profitability. Global Change Biology 19, 14401455. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mora-Ortiz, M and Smith, LMJ (2018) Onobrychis viciifolia: a comprehensive literature review of its history, etymology, taxonomy, genetics, agronomy and botany. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 16, 403418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262118000230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora-Ortiz, M, Swain, MT, Vickers, MJ, Hegarty, MJ, Kelly, R, Smith, LMJ and Skøt, L (2016) De-novo transcriptome assembly for gene identification, analysis, annotation, and molecular marker discovery in Onobrychis viciifolia. BMC Genomics 17, 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3083-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrill, WL, Ditterline, RL and Cash, SD (1998) Insect pests and associated root pathogens of sainfoin in western USA. Field Crops Research 59, 129134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00113-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, JR (1985) Effect of weed control and a companion crop on alfalfa and sainfoin establishment, yields and nutrient composition. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 65, 107116. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps85-015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller-Harvey, I, Bee, G, Dohme-Meier, F, Hoste, H, Karonen, M, Kölliker, R, Lüscher, A, Niderkorn, V, Pellikaan, WF, Salminen, JP and Skøt, L (2019) Benefits of condensed tannins in forage legumes fed to ruminants: importance of structure, concentration, and diet composition. Crop Science 59, 861885. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummey, DL and Ramsey, PW (2017) Can sainfoin improve conditions for establishment of native forbs in crested wheatgrass stands? Ecological Restoration 35, 127137. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.35.2.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munda, S, Munda, S, BK, Nayak, SR, Das, Dey, S, Pradhan, A, CK, Swain and BC, Muduli (2024) Understanding the effects of changing climate on weeds and their management. In Pathak, H, Chatterjee, D, Saha, S and Das, B (eds), Climate Change Impacts on Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum. Advances in Global Change Research, Vol. 78, pp. 405–425. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7935-6_15Google Scholar
Nasirzadeh, AR, Khorram, SM and Heydari, SH (2005) Study of physiological effects of dehydration (drought) stress on vegetative growth of six species of sainfoin (Onobrychis). Genetic Research and Breeding of Rangeland and Forest Plants in Iran 12, 365375 (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/IJRFPBGR.2005.115397Google Scholar
Ndukwu, MC and Onyeoziri, CI (2022) African oil bean seed as feedstock for bio-oil and biodiesel production and on the effects of thermal pre-treatments on the quality of the bio-oil. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 12, 27992810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00754-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niderkorn, V, Baumont, R, Le Morvan, A and Macheboeuf, D (2011) Occurrence of associative effects between grasses and legumes in binary mixtures on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 89, 11381145. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-2819CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niderkorn, V, Mueller-Harvey, I, Le Morvan, A and Aufrère, J (2012) Synergistic effects of mixing cocksfoot and sainfoin on in vitro rumen fermentation. Role of condensed tannins. Animal Feed Science and Technology 178, 4856. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niderkorn, V, Copani, G and Ginane, C (2016) Including bioactive legumes in grass silage to improve productivity and reduce pollutant emissions. 26th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Trondheim, Norway, 4–8 September 2016, pp. 391–393.Google Scholar
Niderkorn, V, Copani, G, Martin, C, Maxin, G, Torrent, F, Rochette, Y and Ginane, C (2019) Effects of including bioactive legumes in grass silage on digestion parameters, nitrogen balance and methane emissions in sheep. Grass and Forage Science 74, 626635. https://doi.org/10.1111/GFS.12454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikola, S (1998) Understanding root systems to improve, seedling quality. HortTechnology, October – December, 8, 544–549.Google Scholar
Noorbakhshian, SJ, Nabipour, M, Meskarbashee, M and Amooaghaie, R (2011) The effect of pod and priming on germination of sainfoin seed. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5, 800807.Google Scholar
Noto, LV, Cipolla, G, Pumo, D, and Francipane, A (2023) Climate change in the Mediterranean basin (part II): a review of challenges and uncertainties in climate change modeling and impact analyses. Water Resources Management 37, 23072323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03444-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojeda-Robertos, N, Manolaraki, F, Theodoridou, K, Aufrere, J, Halbwirth, H, Stich, K, Regos, I, Treutter, D, Mueller-Harvey, I and Hoste, H (2010) The anthelmintic effect of sainfoin (silage, hay, fresh) and the role of flavonoid glycosides. 61st Annual Meeting, European Association of Animal Production, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
O'Mara, FP (2012) The role of grasslands in food security and climate change. Annals of Botany 110(6), 12631270, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özbek, H (2011) Sainfoin, Onobrychis viciifolia Scop: an important bee plant. Uludag Aricilik Dergisi Mayis 11, 5162.Google Scholar
Pankov, DM (2012) Efficiency of sainfoin cultivation in the forest-steppe of the Altai. Kormoproizvodstvo (Кормопроизводство) 10, 3436.Google Scholar
Pankov, DM (2013) The value of melliferous bees in the rational use of lands. Feed Production 10, 3335.Google Scholar
Pankov, DM (2014) Rating the weed infestation of sainfoin crops from the position of beekeeping. Feed Production 1, 2632.Google Scholar
Paolini, V, Fouraste, I and Hoste, H (2004) In vitro effects of three woody plant and sainfoin extracts on 3rd-stage larvae and adult worms of three gastrointestinal nematodes. Parasitology 129, 6977. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182004005268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolini, V, Prevot, F, Dorchies, P and Hoste, H (2005) Lack of effects of quebracho and sainfoin hay on incoming third-stage larvae of Haemonchus contortus in goats. Veterinary Journal 170, 260263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.05.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pareek, N (2017) Climate change impact on soils: adaptation and mitigation. MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences 2, 136139. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojes.2017.02.00026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, RJ and Moss, BR (1981) Nutritional value of Sainfoin hay compared with Alfalfa hay. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 206210. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82555-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathak, N and McKinney, A (2021) Planetary health, climate change, and lifestyle medicine: threats and opportunities. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 15, 541552. https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211008127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, AM, O'Neill, KM, Miller, RS and Blodgett, S (2012) Diversity of flower-visiting bees and their pollen loads on a wildflower seed farm in Montana. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 85, 97108. https://doi.org/10.2317/JKES111202.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, MD, Ransom, CV and Mott, IW (2013) Natural glyphosate tolerance in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). Crop Science 53, 22752282. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.10.0612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, LK (2019) Impact of climate change on twenty-first century crop yields in the U.S. Climate. 7, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7030040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrič, D, Komáromyová, M, Batťányi, D, Kozłowska, M, Filipiak, W, Łukomska, A, Ślusarczyk, S, Szumacher-Strabel, M, Cieślak, A, Várady, M, Kišidayová, S and Váradyová, Z (2022) Effect of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) pellets on rumen microbiome and histopathology in lambs exposed to gastrointestinal nematodes. Agriculture 12, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, BB, Shaw, RF, Holland, MJ, EL, Fry, RD, Bardgett, JM, Bullock and JL, Osborne (2018) Drought reduces floral resources for pollinators. Global Change Biology 24, 32263235. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piper, CV (1924) Forage Plants and Their Culture. New York: The Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Porqueddu, C, Ledda, L and Roggero, PP (2000) Role of forage legumes and constraints for forage legume seed production in Mediterranean Europe. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes 45, 453460.Google Scholar
Poudel, HP, Bhattarai, S, Singer, SD, Biligetu, B and Acharya, S (2023) An insight into sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) breeding: challenges and achievements. Agronomy Journal 115, 28432858. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, S, Kumar, S, Sheetal, KR and Venkatramanan, V (2020) Global Climate Change and Biofuels Policy: indian Perspectives. Singapore: Global Climate Change and Environmental Policy, Springer Singapore, pp. 207226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9570-36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, D, Bordeleau, LM and Antoun, H (1987 a) Symbiotic effectiveness of indigenous arctic rhizobia on a temperate forage legume: sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). Plant and Soil 104, 6369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, D, Bordeleau, LM, Caudry-Reznick, S, Schulman, HM and Antoun, H (1987 b) Characteristics of rhizobia isolated from three legumes indigenous to the Canadian high arctic: Astragalus alpinus, Oxytropis maydelliana, and Oxytropis arctobia. Plant and Soil 98, 313324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, D, Drouin, P, Laberge, S, Bertrand, A, Cloutier, J and Lévesque, G (2003) Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Sainte-Foy, QC G1V 2J3, Canada.Google Scholar
Provenza, FD (1995) Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. Journal of Range Management 48, 217. http://doi.org/10.2307/4002498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provorov, NA and Tikhonovich, IA (2003) Genetic resources for improving nitrogen fixation in legume-rhizobia symbiosis. Genetic resources and Crop Evolution 50, 8999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, DH and Orloff, SB (2013) Benefits and risks of adapting genetically engineered crops: The Roundup Ready alfalfa story. In: S. Bittman and D. Hunt, editors, Cool forages: Advanced management of temperate forages. Pacific Field Corn Assoc., Agassiz, BC, Canada, pp. 7176.Google Scholar
Qiao, Y, Cheng, Q, Zhang, Y, Yan, W, Yi, F and Shi, F (2021) Transcriptomic and chemical analyses to identify candidate genes involved in color variation of sainfoin flowers. BMC Plant Biology 21, 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02827-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, S, Roodbar, S, Brinkley, C and Wolfe, DW (2022) Food security and climate change: differences in impacts and adaptation strategies for rural communities in the global south and north. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5, 691191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.691191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesh, K, Matloob, A, Aslam, F, Florentine, SK and Chauhan, BS (2017) Weeds in a changing climate: vulnerabilities, consequences, and implications for future weed management. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ran, L, Shi, H and Yang, X (2021) Magnitude and drivers of CO2 and CH4 emissions from an arid/semiarid river catchment on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Journal of Hydrology 598, 126260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raza, A, Ali, HH, Zaheer, MS, Iqbal, J, Seleiman, MF, Sattar, J, Ali, B, Khan, S, Arjumend, T and Chauhan, BS (2023) Bio-ecology and the management of Chenopodium murale L.: A problematic weed in Asia. Crop Protection 172, 106332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Re, GA, Piluzza, G, Sulas, L, Franca, A, Porqueddu, C, Sanna, F and Bullitta, S (2014) Condensed tannin accumulation and nitrogen fixation potential of Onobrychis viciifolia Scop. grown in a Mediterranean environment. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94, 639645. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regos, I, Urbanella, A and Treutter, D (2009) Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds from the forage legume sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57, 58435852. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900625rCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricciardelli D'Albore, GC and Roscionii, T (1990) Pollinators of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) in a mountain environment. Apicoltore Moderno 81, 195201.Google Scholar
Richards, KW (2019) Effectiveness of the alfalfa leafcutter bee Megachile rotundata Fab. to pollinate four perennial legumes. Journal of Apicultural Research 59, 6976. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2019.1655180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, KW and Edwards, PD (1988) Density, diversity, and efficiency of pollinators of sainfoin, Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop. The Canadian Entomologist 120, 10851100. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1201085-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos-De Álvarez, L, Greer, A, Jackson, F, Athanasiadou, S, Kyriazakis, I and Huntley, J (2008) The effect of dietary sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on local cellular responses to Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep. Parasitology 135, 11171124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182008004563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocha, J, Oliveira, S, Viana, CM and Ribeiro, AI (2022) Chapter 8 – climate change and its impacts on health, environment and economy. In Prata, JC, Ribeiro, AI and Rocha-Santos, T (eds), One Health. Portugal: Academic Press, pp. 253279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822794-7.00009-5Google Scholar
Rojas-Downing, MM, Nejadhashemi, AP, Harrigan, T and Woznicki, SA (2017) Climate change and livestock: impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management 16, 145163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosov, SA (1952) Sainfoin – one of the best honey plants in crop rotation. Pchelovodstvo Mosk 29, 4652.Google Scholar
Rossi, LMW, Mao, Z, Merino-Martín, L, Roumet, C, Fort, F, Taugourdeau, O, Boukcim, H, Fourtier, S, Del Rey-Granado, M, Chevallier, T, Cardinael, R, Fromin, N and Stokes, A (2020) Pathways to persistence: plant root traits alter carbon accumulation in different soil carbon pools. Plant and Soil 452, 457478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04469-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roulin, A (2014) Melanin-based colour polymorphism responding to climate change. Global Change Biology 20, 33443350. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12594CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, R, Núñez-Delgado, A, Wang, J, Kader, MA, Sarker, T, Hasan, AK and Dindaroglu, T (2021) Cattle manure compost and biochar supplementation improve growth of Onobrychis viciifolia in coal-mined spoils under water stress conditions. Environmental Research 205, 112440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozen, JG, Ozebek, H, Ascher, JS, Sedivy, C, Praz, C, Monfared, A and Mueller, A (2010) Nests, petal usages, floral preferences, and immatures of Osmia (Ozbekosmia) avosetta (Megachilidae: Megachilinae: Osmiini), including biological comparisons with other Osmiine bees. American Museum Novitates 3680, 122. https://doi.org/10.1206/701.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufino-Moya, PJ, Blanco, M, Bertolín, JR and Joy, M (2019) Effect of the method of preservation on the chemical composition and in vitro fermentation characteristics in two legumes rich in condensed tannins. Animal Feed Science and Technology 251, 1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufino-Moya, PJ, Bertolín, JR, Blanco, M, Lobóna, S and Joya, M (2022) Fatty acid profile, secondary compounds and antioxidant activities in the fresh forage, hay and silage of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) and sulla (Hedysarum coronarium). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 102, 47364743. http://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11834CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakhraoui, A, Ltaeif, HB, Sakhraoui, A, Rouz, S and Castillo, JM (2023) Potential use of wild Onobrychis species for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Crop Science 63, 31533174. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvia, M, Olazabal, M, Fokaides, PA, Tardieu, L, Simoes, SG, Geneletti, D, Huartado, S, Viguié, V, Spyridaki, N, Pietrapertosa, F, Ioannou, B, Matosovic, M, Flamos, A, Balzan, M, Feliu, E, Riznar, K, Sel, N, Heidrich, O and Reckien, D (2021) Climate mitigation in the Mediterranean Europe: an assessment of regional and city-level plans. Journal of Environmental Management 295, 113146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos-Medellín, C, Liechty, Z, Edwards, J, Nguyen, B, Huang, B, Weimer, BC and Sundaresan, V (2021) Prolonged drought imparts lasting compositional changes to the rice root microbiome. Nature Plants 7, 10651077. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00967-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saratsis, A, Regos, I, Tzanidakis, N, Voutzourakis, N, Stefanakis, A, Treuter, D, Joachim, A and Sotiraki, S (2012) In vivo and in vitro efficacy of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) against Eimeria spp in lambs. Veterinary Parasitology 188, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sariyildiz, T and Savaci, G (2020) Ability of green cover from sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) and dog rose (Rosa canina L.) to control erosion and improve soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in terraces of Northwest Turkey. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration 5, 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-020-0148-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunois, M, Stavert, AR, Poulter, B, Bousquet, P, Canadell, JG, Jackson, RB, Raymond, PA, Dlugokencky, EJ, Houweling, S, Patra, PK, PK, Ciais, Arora, P, VK, Bastviken, Bergamaschi, D, Blake, P, DR, Brailsford, Bruhwiler, G, Carlson, L, KM, Carrol, Castaldi, M, Chandra, S, Cevoisier, N, Crill, C, PM, Covey, Curry, K, CL, Etiope, Frankenberg, G, Gedney, C, Hegglin, N, MI, Höglund-Isaksson, Hugelius, L, Ishizawa, G, Ito, M, Janssens-Maenhout, A, Jensen, G, KM, Joos, Kleinen, F, Krummel, T, PB, Langenfelds, RL, Laruelle, GG, Liu, MachidaL, Maksyutov, T, McDonald, S, KC, McNorton, Miller, J, PA, Melton, JR, Morino, Müller, I, Murguia-Flores, J, Naik, F, Niwa, V, Noce, Y, O'Doherty, S, Parker, S, RJ, Peng, Peng, C, Peters, S, GP, Prigent, Prinn, C, Ramonet, R, Regnier, M, Riley, P, JW, Rosentreter, JA, Segers, Simpson, A, IJ, Shi, Smith, H, SJ, Steele, LP, Thornton, BF, Tian, Tohjima, H, Tubiello, Y, FN, Tsuruta, Viovy, A, Voulgarakis, N, Weber, A, TS, van Weele, van der Werf, M, GR, Weiss, RF, Worthy, Wunch, D, Yin, D, Yoshida, Y, Zhang, Y, Zhang, W, Zhao, Z, Zheng, Y, Zhu, B, Zhu, Q, and Zhuang, Q (2020) The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth System Science Data 12, 15611623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayar, MS, Han, Y and Basbag, M (2022) Forage yield and forage quality traits of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) genotypes and evaluations with biplot analysis. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 31, 40094017.Google Scholar
Scharenberg, A, Arrigo, Y, Gutzwiller, A, Soliva, CR, Wyss, U, Kreuzer, M and Dohme, F (2007 a) Palatability in sheep and in vitro nutritional value of dried and ensiled sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), and chicory (Cichorium intybus). Archives of Animal Nutrition 61, 481496. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390701664355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scharenberg, A, Arrigo, Y, Gutzwiller, A, Wyss, U, Hess, HD, Kreuzer, M and Dohme, F (2007 b) Effect of feeding dehydrated and ensiled tanniferous sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on nitrogen and mineral digestion and metabolism of lambs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 61, 390405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scharenberg, A, Kreuzer, M and Dohme, F (2009) Suitability of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) hay as a supplement to fresh grass in dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 22, 10051015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlautman, B, Barriball, S, Ciotir, C, Herron, S and Miller, AJ (2018) Perennial grain legume domestication phase I: criteria for candidate Species selection. Sustainability 10, 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiter, AA, Whitman, WC and Larson, KL (1969) Sainfoin. A new legume for North Dakota? North Dakota Farm Research 27, 1113.Google Scholar
Sears, RG, Ditterline, RL and Mathre, DE (1975) Crown and root rotting organisms affecting sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia) in Montana. Plant Disease Reporter 59, 423426.Google Scholar
Sengul, S (2003) Performance of some forage grasses or legumes and their mixtures under dry land conditions. European Journal of Agronomy 19, 401409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00132-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seo, SN and Mendelsohn, R (2008) An analysis of crop choice: adapting to climate change in South American farms. Ecological Economics 67, 109116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergeeva, AG (1955) The effect of lucerne and sainfoin on the water-stable structure of soils under irrigation. Pocvovedenie 12, 3542.Google Scholar
Sheehy, JE and Popple, SC (1981) Photosynthesis, water relations, temperature and canopy structure as factors influencing the growth of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) and lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Annals of Botany 48, 113128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, R, Thomson, D and Newman, G (1987) Sainfoin. In Sheldrick RD, Newman G and Roberts DJ. Legumes for Milk and Meat. Marlow, UK: Chalcombe Publications, pp. 5969.Google Scholar
Shen, S, Chai, X, Zhou, Q, Luo, D, Wang, Y and Liu, Z (2019) Development of polymorphic EST-SSR markers and characterization of the autotetraploid genome of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). PeerJ 7, e6542. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheppard, SC, Cattani, DJ, Ominski, KH, Biligetu, B, Bittman, S and McGeough, EJ (2019) Sainfoin production in western Canada: a review of agronomic potential and environmental benefits. Grass and Forage Science 74, 618. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, WD, Miller, E, Jones, A, García-Rangel, S, Thornton, H and McOwen, C (2021) Enhancing climate change resilience of ecological restoration – a framework for action. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 19, 300310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S, Jaiswal, DK, Krishna, R, Mukherjee, A and Verma, JP (2019) Restoration of degraded lands through bioenergy plantations. Restoration Ecology 28, 263266. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skendžić, S, Zovko, M, Živković, IP, Lešić, V and Lemić, D (2021) The impact of climate change on agricultural insect pests. Insects 12, 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slebodnik, K, Reeve, JR, Norton, JM, MacAdam, JW and Lee, S (2019) Utilization of tannin-containing Forages for sustainable beef production in the Intermountain West. InSSSA International Soils Meeting 7. ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Slepetys, J, Kadziuliene, Z, Sarunaite, L, Tilvikiene, V and Kryzeviciene, A (2012) Biomass potential of plants grown for bioenergy production. In Proceedings of the International Science Conference: Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, Growing and Processing Technologies of Energy Crops, Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava, pp. 66–72.Google Scholar
Smoliak, S, Jonston, A and Hanna, M (1972) Germination and seedling growth of alfalfa, sainfoin and cicer milkvetch. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 52, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoliński, S, Langowska, A and Glazaczow, A (2021) Raised seasonal temperatures reinforce autumn Varroa destructor infestation in honey bee colonies. Scientific Reports 11, 22256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01369-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, D and Rolim, J, Fradinho, MJ and do Paço, TA (2022) Production of preserved forage for horses under water scarcity conditions: a case study. Water 14, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sottie, ET (2014) Characterization of New Sainfoin Populations for Mixed Alfalfa Pastures in Western Canada (PhD thesis). Canada: University of Lethbridge.Google Scholar
Stevovic, V, Stanisavljevic, R, Djukic, D and Djurovic, D (2010) Effect of row spacing on seed and forage yield in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) cultivars. Tubitak 36, 3545.Google Scholar
Stewart, EK, Beauchemin, KA, Dai, X, MacAdam, JW, Christensen, RG and Villalba, JJ (2019) Effect of tannin-containing hays on enteric methane emissions and nitrogen partitioning in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 97, 32863299. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subedi, U (2018) Development of Disease Resistant Fenugreek for Western Canada (MSc thesis). Canada: Faculty of Art and Science, University of Lethbridge. Available at https://opus.uleth.ca/handle/10133/5179Google Scholar
Sunil, S, Akshit, R, Sheoran, RS, Satpal, S, Harender, D, Deepak, L, Sushil, K and Paras, (2020) Impact of climate change on forage and pasture production and strategies for its mitigation – a review. Forage Research 46, 105113.Google Scholar
Szalai, Z (2001) Development of melliferous plant mixtures with long lasting flowering period. Proceedings of the eight international pollination symposium pollination: integrator of crops and native plant systems. Acta Horticulturae 561, 185190. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.561.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taki, H, Okabe, K, Makino, S, Yamaura, Y and Sueyoshi, M (2009) Contribution of small insects to pollination of common buckwheat, a distylous crop. Annals of Applied Biology 155, 121129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00326.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temel, S, Keskin, B, Şimşek, U and Yilmaza, İH (2016 a) The effect of saline and non-saline soil conditions on yield and nutritional characteristics of some perennial legumes forages. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi – Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22, 528538. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001411Google Scholar
Temel, S, Keskin, B, Şimşek, U and Yilmaza, İH (2016 b) The effect of soils having different salt content on mineral accumulations of some forage legume species. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 25, 10381050.Google Scholar
Terrill, TH, Rowan, AM, Douglas, GB and Barry, TN (1992) Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 58, 321329. https://doi.org/10.1002/JSFA.2740580306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, TH, Mosjidis, J, Moore, DA, Shaik, SA, Miller, D, Burke, JM, Muir, JP and Wolfe, R (2007) Effect of pelleting on efficacy of sericea lespedeza hay as a natural dewormer in goats. Veterinary Parasitology 146, 117122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodoridou, K, Aufrere, J, Andueza, D, Pourrat, J, Le Morvan, A, Stringano, E, Mueller-Harvey, I and Baumont, R (2010) Effects of condensed tannins in fresh sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on in vivo and in situ digestion in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 160, 2338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodoridou, K, Aufrère, J, Niderkorn, V, Andueza, D, Le Morvan, A, Picard, F and Baumont, R (2011) In vitro study of the effects of condensed tannins in sainfoin on the digestive process in the rumen at two vegetation cycles. Animal Feed Science and Technology 170, 147159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, JR (1938) The development of sainfoin in its seeding year. Annals of Applied Biology 25, 457471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1938.tb04363.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triebwasser, DJ, Tharayil, N, Preston, CM and Gerard, PD (2012) The susceptibility of soil enzymes to inhibition by leaf litter tannins is dependent on the tannin chemistry, enzyme class and vegetation history. New Phytologist 196, 11221132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04346.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tufenkci, S, Erman, M and Sonmez, F (2006) Effects of phosphorus and nitrogen applications and Rhizobium inoculation on the yield and nutrient uptake of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia L.) under irrigated conditions in Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 101105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2006.9513699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, M and Celik, N (2006) The effects of different row spaces and seeding rates on the hay and crude protein yields of Sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa Lam.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences 12, 175181. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000470Google Scholar
Turk, M, Albayrak, S, Tuzun, CG and Yuksel, O (2011) Effects of fertilisation and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 17, 789794.Google Scholar
Ülger, İ and Kaplan, M (2016) Variations in potential nutritive value, gas and methane production of local Sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) Populations. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi 31, 4247.Google Scholar
USDA (2005) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Biotechnology Regulatory Service. United States: Department of Agriculture, p. 8.Google Scholar
USDA SARE (2007) Managing Cover Crops Profitably, 3rd Edn. United States: USDA SARE, p. 244. Available at http://www.sare.org/publications/covercrops/buckwheat.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Uzun, S, Avci, S, Ozcan, S and Sancak, C (2017) Effects of NaCl on germination and seedling characteristics of different Onobrychis taxa. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 26, 63176323.Google Scholar
Vallero, DA (2019) Air Pollution Calculations. Chapter 8 – Air Pollution Biogeochemistry. Elsevier, pp. 175206. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814934-8.00008-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Geest, K, van der Geest, K, de Sherbinin, A, Kienberger, S, Zommers, Z, Sitati, A, Roberts, E and James, R (2019) The impacts of climate change on ecosystem services and resulting losses and damages to people and society. In Mechler, R, Bouwer, L, Schinko, T, Surminski, S and Linnerooth-Bayer, J (eds), Loss and Damage from Climate Change. Climate Risk Management, Policy and Governance. Cham: Springer, pp. 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_9Google Scholar
Vasta, V, Yáñez-Ruiz, DR, Mele, M, Serra, A, Luciano, G, Lanza, M, Biondi, L and Priolo, A (2010) Bacterial and protozoal communities and fatty acid profile in the rumen of sheep fed a diet containing added tannins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 25492555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vereshchagin, AL, Nickolay, BV and Alexandra, NA (2015) Identification du miel du territoire de l'altai par calorimétrie différentielle à balayage et analyse thermomecanique. 1, 107111.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ and Provenza, FD (1997) Preference for flavoured foods by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administration of nitrogen. British Journal of Nutrition 78, 545561. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19970174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ and Provenza, FD (2000) Postingestive feedback from starch influences the ingestive behaviour of sheep consuming wheat straw. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66, 4963. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00081-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD and Stott, R (2009) Rumen distension and contraction influence feed preference by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 87, 340350. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ, Miller, J, Hall, JO, Clemensen, AK, Stott, R, Snyder, D and Provenza, FD (2013) Preference for tanniferous (Onobrychis viciifolia) and non-tanniferous (Astragalus cicer) forage plants by sheep in response to challenge infection with Haemonchus contortus. Small Ruminant Research 112, 199207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.11.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Ates, S and MacAdam, JW (2021) Non-fiber carbohydrates in forages and their influence on beef production systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5, 566338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.566338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghorn, G (2008) Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production – progress and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 116139. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghorn, GC, Jones, WT, Shelton, ID and McNabb, WC (1990) Condensed tannins and the nutritive value of herbage. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 51, 171176. https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.1990.51.1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghorn, GC, Douglas, GB, Niezen, JH, McNabb, WC and AG, Foote (1998) Forages with condensed tannins – their management and nutritive value for ruminants. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 60, 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, LE (1968) Current and Potential Insect Problems of Sainfoin in America. Sainfoin Symposium. Montana: Montana Agriculture Experimental Station Bulletin.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Berg, BP, Barbieri, LR, Veira, DM and McAllister, TA (2006) Comparison of alfalfa and mixed alfalfa-sainfoin pastures for grazing cattle: effects on incidence of bloat, ruminal fermentation, and feed intake. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 86, 383392. https://doi.org/10.4141/A06-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y, Barbieri, LR, Berg, BP and McAllister, TA (2007) Effects of mixing sainfoin with alfalfa on ensiling, ruminal fermentation and total tract digestion of silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135, 296314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y, Mcallister, TA and Acharya, S (2015) Condensed tannins in sainfoin: composition, concentration, and effects on nutritive and feeding value of sainfoin forage. Crop Science 55, 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q, Li, F, Zhang, D, Liu, Q, Li, G, Liu, X, Li, X and Chen, J (2018) Sediment control and fodder yield increase in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) production with tied-ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting on sloping land. Field Crops Research 225, 5563. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.05.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M, Chen, M, Bai, J, Zhang, J, Su, R, Franco, M, Ding, Z, Zhang, X, Zhang, Y and Guo, X (2022) Ensiling characteristics, in vitro rumen fermentation profile, methane emission and archaeal and protozoal community of silage prepared with alfalfa, sainfoin and their mixture. Animal Feed Science and Technology 284, 115154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, D, Bannink, A, Hatew, B, Van Laar, H and Dijkstra, J (2017) Effects of grass silage quality and level of feed intake on enteric methane production in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 95, 36873699. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1459Google ScholarPubMed
Wei, J, Peng, L, He, Z, Lu, Y and Wang, F (2020) Potential distribution of two invasive pineapple pests under climate change. Pest Management Science 76, 16521663. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5684CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiwei, LU, Xinxiao, YU, Guodong, JIA, LI, Hanzhi and LIU, Ziqiang (2018) Responses of intrinsic water-use efficiency and tree growth to climate change in semi-arid areas of North China. Scientific Reports 8, 308. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18694-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westphal, C, Bommarco, R, Lamborn, E, Petanidou, T, Potts, SG, Roberts, SPM, Szentgyörgyi, H, Vaissière, BE, Woyciechowski, M and Steffan-Dewenter, I (2008) Measuring bee biodiversity in different habitats and biogeographic regions. Ecological Monographs 78, 653671. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1292.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesner, L, Carleton, A and Cooper, C (1968) Factors affecting sainfoin seed germination and emergence. Sainfoin Symposium. Montana Agriculture Experimental Station Bulletin. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University.Google Scholar
Wijekoon, C, Acharya, SN, Siow, YL, Sura, S, Thandapilly, S and Sabra, A (2021) Canadian sainfoin and fenugreek as forage and functional foods. Crop Science 61, 120. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, RJ and Jones, R (2000) Alternative home-grown protein sources for ruminants in the United Kingdom. Animal Feed Science and Technology 85, 2332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00140-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, SRO, Moatea, PJ, Hannaha, MC, Ribauxa, BE, Wales, WJ and Eckard, RJ (2011) Background matters with the SF6 tracer method for estimating enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: A critical evaluation of the SF6 procedure. Animal Feed Science and Technology 170, 265276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, TJ, Michez, D, Paxton, RJ, Drossart, M, Neumann, P, Gérard, M, Vanderplanck, M, Barraud, A, Martinet, B, Leclercq, N and NJ, Vereecken (2020) Managed honey bees as a radar for wild bee decline? Apidologie 51, 11001116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-020-00788-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, GQ, Feng, RJ, Li, SJ and Du, YY (2017 a) Exogenous application of proline alleviates salt-induced toxicity in sainfoin seedlings. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 27, 246251.Google Scholar
Wu, GL, Feng, RH, Wang, C and Du, Y (2017 b) Silicon ameliorates the adverse effects of salt stress on sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia) seedlings. Plant, Soil and Environment 63, 545551. https://doi.org/10.17221/665/2017-PSECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y, Zhao, F, Liu, S, Wang, L, Qiu, L, Alexandrov, G and Jothiprakash, V (2018) Bioenergy production and environmental impacts. Geoscience Letters 5, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-018-0114-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, GQ, Li, H, Zhu, YH and Li, SJ (2021) Comparative physiological response of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia) seedlings to alkaline and saline-alkaline stress. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 31, 10281035. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2021.4.0299Google Scholar
Xu, BC, Gichuki, P, Shan, L and Li, FM (2006) Aboveground biomass production and soil water dynamics of four leguminous forages in semiarid region, northwest China. South African Journal of Botany 72, 507516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakovlev, GP, Sytin, AK and Roskov, YUR (1996) Legumes of Northern Eurasia, a Check-List. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Yakupoglu, T, Gundogan, R, Dindaroglu, T, Kusvuran, K, Gokmen, V, Rodrigo-Comino, J, Gyasi-Agyei, Y and Cerdà, A (2021) Tillage impacts on initial soil erosion in wheat and sainfoin fields under simulated extreme rainfall treatments. Sustainability 13, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, H, Zhou, H, Wang, W, Tran, L-SP and Zhang, B (2020) Transcriptome analysis reveals potential roles of abscisic acid and polyphenols in adaptation of Onobrychis viciifolia to extreme environmental conditions in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Biomolecules 10, 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060967CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, H, Zhou, H, Wang, W, et al. (2021) Evidence for miRNAs involved in the high-altitude responses of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) grown in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 31, 533544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-021-00702-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousef, MAZ and Abdul-Karim, S (2012) Ecological studies on nitrogen fixing bacteria from leguminous plants at the north of Jordan. African Journal of Microbiology Research 6, 36563661. http://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.098Google Scholar
Yu, Y, Wei, W, Chen, LD, Jia, FY, Yang, L, Zhang, HD and Feng, TJ (2015) Responses of vertical soil moisture to rainfall pulses and land uses in a typical loess hilly area, China. Solid Earth 6, 595608. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-595-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yüksek, F and Yüksek, T (2015) Growth performance of Sainfoin and its effects on the runoff, soil loss and sediment concentration in a semi-arid region of Turkey. CATENA 133, 309317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.05.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandalinas, SI, Balfagon, D, Gomez-Cadenas, A and Mittler, R (2022) Responses of plants to climate change: metabolic changes during abiotic stress combination in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 33393354. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H, Pan, C, Gu, S, Ma, Q, Zhang, Y, Li, X and Shi, K (2019 a) Stomatal movements are involved in elevated CO2-mitigated high temperature stress in tomato. Physiologia Plantarum 165, 569583. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12752CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, D, Wang, Q, Li, G, Li, X and Sample, DJ (2019 b) Optimum ridge width and suitable mulching material for sainfoin production with ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting in semiarid regions of China. Arid Land Research and Management 33, 274296. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2018.1563241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, GS, Clair, AL, Dolezal, AG, Toth, AL and O'Neal, ME (2022) Can native plants mitigate climate-related forage dearth for honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae)? Journal of Economic Entomology 115, 19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toab202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinyengere, N, Crespo, O and Hachigonta, S (2013) Crop response to climate change in southern Africa: a comprehensive review. Global and Planetary Change 111, 118126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.08.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zörb, C, Geilfus, CM and Dietz, KJ (2019) Salinity and crop yield. Plant Biology 21, 138. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Evolution of annual number of publications on Onobrychis species and O. viciifolia published from 1963 to 2024 (Sources: Google Scholar, Web of Science, Springer and PubMed).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Centenary evolution of worldwide geographical distribution of Onobrychis viciifolia (88.635 occurrences) from 1600 to 2024. The colours from yellow to orange represent the density of occurrence for a given area.Source: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, https://www.gbif.org/

Figure 2

Figure 3. Summary of the main tolerance mechanisms of Onobrychis viciifolia to (a) salinity and (b) drought stress.

Figure 3

Table 1. Effective bacterial and mycorrhiza strains for Onobrychis viciifolia inoculation

Figure 4

Table 2. Nutritional value of Onobrychis viciifolia at different stages of growth

Figure 5

Table 3. Characteristics and nutritive value of Onobrychis viciifolia feeding forms

Figure 6

Table 4. Biological activity of Onobrychis viciifolia