Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:46:04.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The roles of energy- or protein-rich supplements in the subtropics for young cattle consuming basal diets that are low in digestible energy and protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. W. Hennessy
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, New South Wales Agricultural Research Station, Orafton 2460, Australia
P. J. Williamson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, New South Wales Agricultural Research Station, Orafton 2460, Australia
J. V. Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, The University of New England, Armidale 2351, Australia
T. J. Kempton
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, The University of New England, Armidale 2351, Australia
R. A. Leng
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, The University of New England, Armidale 2351, Australia

Summary

Twenty-seven Hereford weaner steers (mean age 11 months, and live weight 142±17 kg) were used to study the effect of supplementation of an energy-rich grain (sorghum), and/or a protein meal on the live-weight change of cattle on a basal diet of low-quality grass hay over 48 days (Expt 1). The basal hay had an estimated energy value of 6·2 MJ metabolizable energy (ME)/kg dry matter (D.M.) and a nitrogen content of 6·2 g/kg D.M. Corresponding values for the sorghum supplement were 12·4 and 14·4, and for the protein meal 9·6 and 65. The daily rates of supplementation in Expt 1 were (g/head) 0 (nil), 600 (P1) or 1200 (P2) of protein meal pellets or 0 (nil), 560 (S1) or 1120 (S2) of sorghum and all combinations of P1 or P2 with S1 or S2. The carry-over effect of such supplementation on subsequent growth was recorded in Expt 2 when the steers grazed a kikuyu grass pasture for 100 days.

In Expt 1, organic-matter intake of hay (HOMI) was increased (P < 0·01) by protein but decreased (P < 0·01) by the sorghum supplements. By 48 days, P1-supplemented steers were eating 29·5% more hay than non-supplemented steers, and P2 steers were eating 43·5% more hay than the non-supplemented steers. S1 supplemented steers were eating 29·5% less, and S2 steers 23% less hay than non-supplemented steers. Steers lost weight on the basal hay diet, and at the lower level of sorghum (S1) supplementation, but were able to maintain weight at the higher level (S2) of supplementation. In contrast, steers supplemented with protein gained weight (P < 0·01): 430 g/day on P1 and 700 g/day on P2 treatments. None of the steers offered combinations of P and S had live-weight changes as high as those offered only protein supplements. There was no evidence of compensatory gain by the smaller steers in Expt 2 when grazing and unsupplemented.

Glucose kinetics in plasma were studied in each steer on day 35 of Expt 1 by means of a single intravenous injection of [2-3H]glucose. The quantity of glucose in the sampled pool and the total rate of glucose entry into the pool (GER) were higher (P < 0·01) in steers that were protein supplemented, with GER being related to both ME intake and to N intake per unit ME intake.

Urea pool size and entry rate were also estimated on day 35 of Expt 1 using a single intravenous injection of [14C]urea. The quantity of urea in the sampled pool, and entry rate into the pool were increased significantly (P < 0·01) by protein, but reduced (P < 0·05) by sorghum, supplementation. Rumen ammonia concentrations were low in steers given the hay alone, and when supplemented with sorghum (10–15 mg N/l), but were significantly higher (70 mg N/l; P < 0·01) during protein supplementation.

It was concluded that growth of cattle on the basal ration was restricted by low voluntary intakes of hay. Intake was increased substantially by protein supplementation. The consequent increase in live weight was due to a greater intake of organic matter which was accompanied by a greater synthesis of glucose and availability of amino acids in the animals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. H. & McGowan, M. (1961). A filtration procedure for the in vitro determination of digestibility of herbage. Journal of the British Grassland Society 16, 275277.Google Scholar
Baile, C. A. (1975). Control of feed intake in ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 333350. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J., McAnally, R. A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1944). Absorption of volatile acids from the alimentary tract of the sheep and other animals. Journal of Experimental Biology 20, 120125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckental, I., Oldham, J. D. & Sutton, J. D. (1980). Glucose and urea kinetics in cows in early lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 44, 3345.Google Scholar
Cocimano, M. R. & Leng, R. A. (1967). Metabolism of urea in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 21, 353371.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. D. H. (1978). The nutrition and production of beef cattle in a subtropical environment. Ph.D. thesis, The University of New England, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1965). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. II. The influence of sustained duodenal infusions of casein or urea upon voluntary intake of low-protein roughages by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 451462.Google Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1977). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VIII. Relationships between the voluntary intake of herbage by sheep and the protein/energy ratio in the digestion products. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 907915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & Rogers, Q. R. (1978). Amino acid imbalance in ruminant lambs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 12631279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Topps, J. H. (1963). Studies of protein requirements of ruminants. 2. Protein requirement for maintenance of three breeds of cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 17, 549556.Google Scholar
Erwin, E. S., Marco, G. J. & Emery, E. M. (1961). Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 17681774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganev, G., Ørskov, E. R. & Smart, R. (1979). The effect of roughage or concentrate feeding and rumen retention time on total degradation of protein in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 651656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. E. (1964). Amino acid toxicities and imbalances. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism (ed. Munro, H. N. and Allison, J. B.), vol. 2, pp. 87134. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Havilah, E. J., Wallis, D. M., Morris, R. & Woolnough, J. A. (1977). A micro-colorimetric method for determination of ammonia in kjeldahl digests with a manual spectrophotometer. Laboratory Practice 26, 545547.Google Scholar
Hennessy, D. W., Lee, G. J. & Williamson, P. J. (1983). Nitrogen loss from protein meals held in terylene bags in the rumen of cattle and the nutritive value of the residues. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Hennessy, D. W., Williamson, P. J., Lowe, R. F. & Baigent, D. R. (1981). The role of protein supplements in nutrition of young grazing cattle and their subsequent productivity. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 205212.Google Scholar
Hugget, A. St. G. & Nixon, D. A. (1957). Enzymic determination of blood glucose. Biochemical Journal 66, 12.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. A. & Siebert, B. D. (1980). The utilization of spear grass (Heteropogon contortus). IV. The nature and flow of digesta in cattle fed on spear grass alone and with protein or nitrogen or sulphur. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 10371047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. B. (1965). Determination of the specific activity of labelled blood glucose by liquid scintillation using glucose penta-acetate. Analytical Biochemistry 12, 249258.Google Scholar
Judson, G. J. & Leng, R. A. (1972). Estimation of the total entry rate and resynthesis of glucose in sheep using glucoses uniformly labelled with 14C and variously labelled with 3H. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 25, 13131332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, T. J. & Leng, R. A. (1979). Protein nutrition of growing lambs. 1. Responses in growth and rumen function to supplementation of a low-protein-cellulosic diet with either urea, casein or formaldehydetreated casein. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 289302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leng, R. A., Steel, J. W. & Luick, J. R. (1967). Contribution of propionate to glucose synthesis in sheep. Biochemistry Journal 103, 785790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Miller, H. (1965). Automated and manual direct methods for the determination of blood urea. Clinical Chemistry 11, 624627.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin No. 33, London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. (1975). Quantitative models of nitrogen metabolism in sheep. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 416431. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Pisulewski, P. M., Okorie, A. U., Buttery, P. J., Haresign, W. & Lewis, D. (1981). Ammonia concentration and protein synthesis in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 759766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satter, L. D. & Slyter, L. L. (1974). Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 199208.Google Scholar
Shaw, N. H. & Bisset, W. J. (1955). Characteristics of a bunch spear grass (Heteropogon contortus (L.) Beauv.) pasture grazed by cattle in subtropical Queensland. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 539552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1971). Factors limiting the intake of feed by sheep. V. Feed intake and the productive performance of the ruminant lamb in relation to the quantity of crude protein digested in the intestines. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 307320.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1979). Digestion during pregnancy and lactation in sheep. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 10, 442444.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1982). Animal factors affecting feed intake. In Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures (ed. Hacker, J. B.), pp. 183198. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
White, R. G., Steel, J. W., Leng, R. A. & Luick, J. R. (1969). Evaluation of three isotope-dilution techniques for studying the kinetics of glucose metabolism in sheep. Biochemical Journal 114, 203214.Google Scholar
Wiltrout, D. W. & Satter, L. D. (1972). Contribution of propionate to glucose synthesis in the lactating and non-lactating cow. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 307317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar