Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:30:09.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Results from three cycles of six-course rotations on light land

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. Hanley
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
W. J. Ridgman
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge

Summary

A rotation experiment comparing the effects of length, type and management of leys on three test crops in six-course rotations during three cycles is described and the results discussed.

Although the yields of the test crops varied from cycle to cycle there were no clear-out trends to suggest that the yield improves or deteriorates as time goes on with these particular rotations; the full benefit of the leys was obtained in the first cycle.

The yield of potatoes immediately following the leys was no greater than the yield in an all-arable rotation receiving adequate nitrogen fertilizer, but the yields of two, barley crops following the potatoes were less in the all-arable rotation than in ley rotations even when 58 kg N/ha/year and 38t dung/ha/cycle had been applied and trefoil ploughed-in in the all-arable rotation. Rotations containing lucerne or lucernecocksfoot leys gave their greatest yields of potatoes and of barley following potatoes without any applied nitrogen fertilizer, but in the second barley crop showed the same sort of nitrogen responses as the all-arable rotation.

Yield data were also obtained on the leys themselves in each cycle. These showed a decline from the first to third cycle in yield of broad red clover grown as 1-year leys and in that of 3-year leys which contained lucerne, both of which could be explained by the build-up of specific diseases. There were also changes in the effect of grazing compared with mowing on the yield of some leys but little change in the effects on leys of applying nitrogen to them. However there was no suggestion that these changes affected the arable crops that followed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Garner, F. H. & Sanders, H. G. (1940). Studies with lucerne (Medicago sativa) – row distances and ‘smother’ crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 30, 182188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, F., Ridgman, W. J. & Allen, E. J. (1973). Some effects of the inclusion of leys in a six-course rotation on light land. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, F., Ridgman, W. J. & Jarvis, R. H. (1964). The effect of previous cropping and manuring on the yield of potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 62, 3946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, C. A. H. & Seale, R. S. (1966). The Soils of the District around Cambridge. Harpenden: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Jarvis, R. H., Hanley, F. & Ridgman, W. J. (1958). The effect of leys on soil fertility. II. The effect of undersowing with grasses and legumes on the yield of a barley nurse crop. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 51, 229233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute or Agricultural Botany (1977). Recommended varieties of herbage legumes 1977/8, Farmers' leaflet no. 4.Google Scholar
Whitear, J. D., Hanley, F. & Ridgman, W. J. (1962). Studies on lucerne and lucerne-grass leys. VI. Further studies on the effect of systems of grazing management on the persistence of a lucerne-cocksfoot ley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 415428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1935). The design and analysis of factorial experiments. Imperial Bureau of Soil Science Technical Communication, no. 35.Google Scholar