Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:06:51.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to sowing time of three contrasting Australian cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. J. Mendham
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252C, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
J. Russell
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industry, Mt Pleasant Laboratories, Po Box 46, Kings Meadows
N. K. Jarosz
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252C, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia

Summary

Serial sowings of three cultivars of oilseed rape were made from autumn (May) to spring (October) at two sites, one in the north and one in the south of Tasmania, in 1981. The highest seed yields at both sites exceeded 5 t/ha from early sowing, ranging down to c. 2 t/ha from late sowing at a site where irrigation was adequate and to < 1 t/ha where late-sown crops suffered from water stress. The midseason cultivar Marnoo gave the highest yields at both sites, resulting from a combination of substantial (800 g/m2) top growth before flowering, excellent seed survival, a long period for grain filling and high oil content. The early-flowering line RU1 made much less growth before flowering; while this was partly made up for in later growth, nearly as many seeds per pod being retained as in Marnoo, oil content was low. The later-flowering cultivar Wesbell made more growth before flowering than the other cultivars, but when sown early it tended to grow tall, lodge and lose many pods in the dense, tangled canopy. This, combined with generally fewer seeds per pod, resulted in a much less efficient crop in allocation of dry matter to seeds and oil. Wesbell failed to flower uniformly from the late sowings, indicating segregation for vernalization response. The many immature seeds at harvest gave a low overall oil content. All three cultivars responded to vernalization and longer photoperiod in a pot experiment. While photoperiod appeared to be the main factor controlling the development rate to flowering in the field, there were interactions with vernalization response andtemperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. & Scott, R. K. (1980). An analysis of growth of the potato crop. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 583606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Dennis Jones, R. (1983). Environmental influences on the development, growth and yield of barley. In Barley Production and Marketing (Eds Wright, G. M. & Wynn-Williams, R. B.), pp. 21–50. Special Publication, Agronomy Society of New Zealand, No. 2.Google Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Russell, J. & Buzza, G. C. (1984). The contribution of seed survival to yield in new Australian cultivars of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 303316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. A. & Scott, R. K., (1981 a). The effects of delayed sowing and weather on growth, development and yield of winter oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 389416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. A. & Scott, R. K. (1981 b). The effects of seed size, autumn nitrogen and plant population density on the response to delayed sowing in winter oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 417–428.Google Scholar
Thurling, N. (1974). Morphophysiological determinants of yield in rapeseed (Brassica campestris and Brassica napus). 1. Growth and morphological characters. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 697710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar