Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:19:42.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of winter wheat to prolonged waterlogging under outdoor conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. K. Belford
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Letcombe Laboratory, Wantage, 0X12 9JT

Summary

The response of winter wheat cv. Maris Huntsman to waterlogging was studied in two experiments in soil columns outdoors. Winter waterlogging treatments increased nodal root production and the proportion of aerenchyma within roots, but caused chlorosis and premature senescence of leaves, and decreased tillering. For all treatments, grain losses were much less than expected from the extent of tiller loss in winter; losses after single waterlogging events ranged from 2% (after 47 days with the water-table at 5 cm) to 16% (after 80 days with the water-table at the soil surface). Yield losses after three waterloggings at the seedling, tillering and stem elongation stages of growth were additive, and totalled 19%. In many treatments, grain loss was associated with lighter individual grain weights, suggesting that the size of the root system or efficiency of water and nutrient uptake by roots at the later stages of growth may have been less after earlier waterlogging. The importance of nitrogen fertilizer in maintaining a satisfactory plant nitrogen status was shown when nitrogen was with held before a 3-week waterlogging treatment during stem elongation; tiller and floret survival was subsequently greatly restricted and grain yields decreased 22% below those of plants waterlogged at the same stage of growth but supplied with nitrogen.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, A. C. (1978). The effect of drainage treatments on cereal yields: results from experiments on clay lands. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 229235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. B. & Jones, H. G. (1975). The physiology of wheat. Plant Breeding Institute Annual Report 1974, pp. 20–73.Google Scholar
Barker, M. G. (1963). A drainage investigation on a clay soil. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 124, 5059.Google Scholar
Bourget, S. J., Finn, B. J. & Dow, B. K. (1966). Effect of different soil moisture tensions on flax and cereals. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 46, 213216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, R. Q., Belford, R. K., Gales, K. & Dennis, C. W. (1980). A lysimeter system used to study the effect of transient waterlogging on crop growth and yield. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 105116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, R. Q., Belford, R. K., Gales, K., Dennis, C. W. & Prew, R. D. (1980). Effects of waterlogging at different stages of development on the growth and yield of winter wheat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 117132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, M. C. & Sisworo, E. J. (1977). Early effects of flooding on nitrogen deficiency and leaf chlorosis in barley. New Phytologist 79, 567571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, M. C., Sisworo, E. J. & Saker, L. R. (1979). Alleviation of waterlogging damage to young barley by application of nitrate and a synthetic cytokinin, and comparison between the effects of waterlogging, nitrogen deficiency and root excision. New Phytologist 82, 315329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. T. (1975). Wheat. In Crop Physiology–Some Case Histories (ed. Evans, L. T.), pp. 101151. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). A physiological analysis of cereal yield. II. Partitioning of dry matter. Agricultural Progress 53, 5170.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., Crawford, D. V. & McGowan, M. (1979 a). Nutrient relations of winter wheat. 1. Accumulation and distribution of Na, K, Ca, Mg, P, S, and N. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 485494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J., Crawford, D. V. & McGowan, M. (1979 b). Nutrient relations of winter wheat. 2. Movement of nutrients to the root and their uptake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 495504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat: 1. Growth of the root system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 91102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, K. C. (1979). A gas chromatographic method for the determination of oxygen dissolved in water using an electron capture detector. Journal of Chromatographic Science 16, 311313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, R. K. M. (1978). Seasonal changes in the position of the shoot apex of winter wheat and spring barley in relation to the soil surface. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 245248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labanauskas, C. K., Stolzy, L. H. & Luxmoore, R. J. (1975). Soil temperature and soil aeration effeots on concentrations and total amounts of nutrients in ‘Yecora’ wheat grain. Soil Science 120, 450455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyshon, A. J. & Sheard, R. W. (1974). Influence of short-term flooding on the growth and plant nutrient composition of barley. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 54, 463473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxmoore, R. J., Fisher, R. A. & Stolzy, L. H. (1973). Flooding and soil temperature effects in wheat during grain filling. Agronomy Journal 65, 361364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, R. S. (1977). Plant Root Systems: their Function and Interaction with the Soil. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Sieben, W. H. (1964). The effect of drainage conditions of the soil on nitrogen supply and yield. Landbouwundig Tijdschrift 76 (20), 784802.Google Scholar
Smith, K. A. & Dowdell, R. J. (1973). Gas chromatographic analysis of the soil atmosphere: automatic analysis of gas samples for O2, N2, Ar, CO2, N2O and C1–C4 hydrocarbons. Journal of Chromatographic Science 11, 655658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. P. (1976). The agricultural climate of England and Wales. Technical Bulletin 34. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Sojka, R. E., Stolzy, L. H. & Kaufmann, M. R. (1975). Wheat growth related to rhizosphere temperature and oxygen levels. Agronomy Journal 67, 591596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trought, M. C. T. (1978). Effects of waterlogging soil on the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Trought, M. C. T. & Drew, M. C. (1980 a). The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Triticum aeativum L.). I. Shoot and root growth in relation to changes in the concentrations of dissolved gases and solutes in the soil solution. Plant and Soil 54, 7794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trought, M. C. T. & Drew, M. C. (1980 b). The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Triticum aeativum L.). II. Acoumulation and redistribution of nutrients by the shoot. Plant and Soil 56, 187199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoorn, J. W. (1958). Results of a ground water level experimental field with arable crops on clay soil. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 6, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varade, S. B., Stolzy, L. H. & Letey, J. (1970). Influence of temperature, light intensity and aeration on growth and root porosity of wheat, Triticum aeativum. Agronomy Journal 62, 505507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, E. R., Lapins, P. & Barron, R. J. W. (1976). Effect of waterlogging on the growth, grain and straw yield of wheat, barley and oats. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 16, 114121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, P. T., Stolzy, L. H. & Letey, J. (1969). Survival of plants under prolonged flooded conditions. Agronomy Journal 61, 844847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar