Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:04:35.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The response of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare) and forage maize (Zea mays) crops to polyhalite, a multi-nutrient fertilizer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2020

R.D. Lillywhite ,
J. J. J. Wiltshire Open the ORCID record for J. J. J. Wiltshire [Opens in a new window] ,
J. Webb  and
H. Menadue
R.D. Lillywhite
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Wellesbourne, CV35 9EF, UK
J. J. J. Wiltshire*
Affiliation:
Ricardo Energy & Environment, Gemini Building, Fermi Avenue, Harwell, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QR, UK
J. Webb
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher, Wolverhampton, UK
H. Menadue
Affiliation:
Ricardo Energy & Environment, Gemini Building, Fermi Avenue, Harwell, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QR, UK
*
Author for correspondence: J. J. J. Wiltshire, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Polyhalite is a multi-nutrient mineral ore containing potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and sulphur (S). Historically, it has enjoyed minor use as a fertilizer, but the opening of a new mine in the UK will make larger quantities available. Therefore, an examination of the performance of crops fertilized with polyhalite, or selected commercial alternatives, was pertinent and is reported here.

Four field trials were carried out between 2013 and 2016 to investigate the response of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and forage maize (Zea mays L.) to different application rates of polyhalite, potassium chloride (muriate of potash, MOP) and potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash, SOP) fertilizers. Potassium and S nutrition were the focus of these trials as they limit field production more often than Mg and Ca.

Polyhalite was found to be an effective source of both K and S for crop production. In three out of four trials, application of polyhalite resulted in similar or greater K offtake compared with both MOP and SOP; MOP application resulted in greater K offtake in one trial. In three out of four trials, application of polyhalite resulted in similar or better S offtake compared with both MOP and SOP; SOP application resulted in greater S offtake in one trial. Polyhalite and MOP treatments produced similar total dry weight in all four trials, but were slightly inferior to SOP treatment.

Keywords

Fertilizerpolyhalitepotassiumsulphurcrop productionbarleymaize
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 158 , Issue 4 , May 2020 , pp. 269 - 278
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, M (2014) Influence of integrated levels of potassium and zinc on the green fodder yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 4, 162–170.Google Scholar
Barbarick, KA (1991) Polyhalite applications to sorghum-sudangrass and leaching in soil columns. Soil Science 151, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, M, Li, YC, Liu, G, He, Z, Mylavarapu, R and Zhang, S (2017) Characterizing polyhalite plant nutritional properties. Agricultural Research and Technology 6, 555690.Google Scholar
Bernardi, ACC, Souza, GB and Vale, F (2018) Polyhalite compared to KCl and gypsum in alfalfa fertilization. Electronic International Fertilizer Correspondent (e-ifc) 52, 3–9.Google Scholar
Boguszewski, W, Drzas, K and Drzas, E (1968) Investigations on the fertilizing values of Polish polyhalites. Pamiet. Pulawski 32, 155–168.Google Scholar
Bouwman, AF, Van Vuuren, DP, Derwent, RG and Posch, M (2002) A global analysis of acidification and eutrophication of terrestrial ecosystems. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 141, 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camberato, J and Casteel, S (2017) Sulfur deficiency. Soil Fertility Update. Purdue University Department of Agronomy 1-6.Google Scholar
Ceccoti, SP (1996) Plant nutrient sulphur – a review of nutrient balance, environmental impact and fertilizers. In Rodriguez-Barrueco, C (ed). Fertilizers and Environment. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, DT and Hanson, JB (1980) The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 31, 239–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocker, MD, Orris, GJ and Wynn, J (2016) U.S. Geological Survey assessment of global potash production and resources – a significant advancement for global development and a sustainable future. GSA Special Papers 520, 89–98.Google Scholar
Dal Molin, SJ, Nascimento, CO, Teixeira, PS and Benites, VD (2020) Polyhalite as a potassium and multinutrient source for plant nutrition. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 66, 667–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defra (2010) Fertilizer Manual (RB209), 8th Edn. London: Defra and The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dick, WA, Kost, D and Chen, L (2008) Availability of sulfur to crops from soil and other sources. In Jez, J (ed). Sulfur: A Missing Link Between Soils, Crops and Nutrition. Madison. WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Fraps, GS and H, Schmidt (1932) Availability to plants of potash in polyhalite. 449 Bulletin Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Hoang, MT, Duong, MM, Truong, TT, Ho, HC and Pham, VB (2016) Agronomic efficiency of polyhalite application on peanut yield and quality in Vietnam. International Fertilizer Correspondent (e-ifc) 47, 3–11.Google Scholar
Høgh-Jensen, H and Pedersen, MB (2003) Morphological plasticity by crop plants and their potassium use efficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition 26, 969–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan-Meille, L and Pellerin, S (2008) Shoot and root growth of hydroponic maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by K-deficiency. Plant and Soil 304, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, SJ, Smith, FW, Wagner, D, Mounteney, I, Bell, CP, Milne, CJ, Gowing, CJB and Pottas, TL (2016) An improved approach to characterize potash-bearing evaporite deposits, evidenced in North Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Economic Geology 111, 719–742. Available at: http://economicgeology.org/lookup/doi/10.2113/econgeo.111.3.719, [online].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepeshkov, IN and Shaposhnikova, A (1958) Natural polyhalite salt as a new type of potassium-magnesium-boron fertilizer. Udobr. Uzozh 11, 33–35.Google Scholar
Mello, SD, Pierce, FJ, Tonhati, R, Almeida, GS, Netto, DD and Pavuluri, K (2018) Potato response to polyhalite as a potassium source fertilizer in Brazil: yield and quality. Hortscience 53, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercik, S (1981) The effect of polyhalite of varying degrees of communication on the yield dynamics and uptake of nutrients by plants. Rocz. Nauk Roln 104, 53–66.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1981) The Analysis of Agricultural Materials, 2nd edn, London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
Olsen, SR, Cole, CV, Watanabe, FS and Dean, LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture, Circular No 939.Google Scholar
Panitkin, VA (1967) Effect of polyhalite on sandy loam soil. Agrokhimiya 1, 81–84.Google Scholar
Pavuluri, K, Malley, Z, Mzimbiri, MK, Lewis, TD and Meakin, R (2017) Evaluation of polyhalite in comparison to muriate of potash for corn grain yield in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. African Journal of Agronomy 5, 325–332.Google Scholar
Rawashdeh, RA, Xavier-Oliveira, E and Maxwell, P (2016) The potash market and its future prospects. Resources Policy 47, 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, K, Pan, X, Zeng, J and Jiao, Y (2017) Distribution and source identification of dissolved sulfate by dual isotopes in waters of the Babu subterranean river basin, SW China. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 312, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowell, DL (1995) Soil Science – Methods and Applications. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Salimi, S, Moradi, A and Banipur, G (2012) Effect among potassium and boron on quantitative traits of maize. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 3, 455–460.Google Scholar
Stromeyer, F (1818) Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen. Kön Ges Wiss 209, 2081–2084.Google Scholar
Terelak, H (1975) The effect of polyhalite fertilizer on the content of potassium and magnesium in the soil and plants. Pamiet Pulawski 63, 67–84.Google Scholar
Tiwari, DD, Pandey, SB and Katiyar, NK (2015) Effects of polyhalite as a fertilizer on yield and quality of the oilseed crops mustard and sesame. International Fertilizer Correspondent (e-ifc) 42, 10–17.Google Scholar
VSN International (2010) Genstat for Windows, 13th edn, Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International.Google Scholar
Webb, J, Jephcot, C, Fraser, A, Wiltshire, J, Aston, S, Rose, R, Vincent, K and Roth, B (2016) Do UK crops and grassland require greater inputs of sulphur fertilizer in response to recent and forecast reductions in sulphur emissions and deposition? Soil Use and Management 32, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, WAD (1973) The soils of the National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne. Annual report of the National Vegetable Research Station 1973, 21–30.Google Scholar
Withers, PJA, Tytherleigh, ARJ and ODonnell, FM (1995) Effect of sulphur fertilizers on the grain yield and sulphur content of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science 125, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yermiyahu, U, Zipori, I, Faingold, I, Yusopov, L, Faust, N and Bar-Tal, A (2017) Polyhalite as a multi nutrient fertilizer – potassium, magnesium, calcium and sulfate. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 64, 145–157.Google Scholar
Zain, M and Ismail, M (2016) Effects of potassium rates and types on growth, leaf gas exchange and biochemical changes in rice (Oryza sativa) planted under cyclic water stress. Agricultural Water Management 164, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, FJ, Fortune, S, Barbosa, VL, McGrath, SP, Stobart, R, Bilsborrow, PE, Booth, EJ, Brown, A and Robson, P (2006) Effects of sulphur on yield and malting quality of barley. Journal of Cereal Science 43, 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zientek, ML, Hammarstrom, JM and Johnson, KM (eds) (2010) Potash – A Global Overview of Evaporite-Related Potash Resources, Including Spatial Databases of Deposits, Occurrences, and Permissive Tracts. U.S. Department of the Interior. Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5090-S.Google Scholar