Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T05:22:05.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The response of the muscles of weanling Large White × Landrace pigs to methionine and palm-oil supplementation to cassava flour-soya-bean meal diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

O. O. Balogun ,
B. L. Fetuga  and
V. A. Oyenuga
O. O. Balogun
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
B. L. Fetuga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
V. A. Oyenuga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was observed in a recently concluded study (O. O. BalogunandB. L. Fetuga, unpublished data) that methionine and palm-oil supplementation to a cassava flour-soya-bean meal diet encouraged satisfactory growth, efficiency of live-weight gain, nitrogen retention and carcass quality of weanling pigs. Our earlier reports (Balogun & Fetuga, 1981; Balogun, Fetuga & Oyenuga, 1982) also indicated that the muscles of pigs responded differently to dietary methionine and lysine and that the quantitative requirements of these amino acids for maximum development of the muscles were at variance with the methionine or lysine requirements for maximum growth performance and nitrogen retention.

Type
Short Note
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 757 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1970). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, B.C.Google Scholar
Balooun, O. O.Fetuga, B. L. (1981). Methionine requirements of weanling European pigs given cassava flour–soybean meal diets. Animal Production 33, 305–312.Google Scholar
Balogun, O. O., Fetuga, B. L.Oyenuga, V. A. (1982). Response of the muscles of growing pigs to dietary lysine levels. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 1177–1184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, W. G.Cox, G. M. (1968). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dickerson, J. W. T.Mccance, R. A. (1975). The response of the hind limb muscles of the weanling rat to undernutrition and subsequent rehabilitation. British Journal of Nutrition 33, 171–180.Google Scholar
Fetuga, B. L., Babatunde, G. M.Oyenuga, V. A. (1975). Protein levels in diets for European pigs in the tropics. 1. The effect of methionine supplementation on the protein requirements of growing pigs. Animal Production 20, 133–146.Google Scholar
aFetuga, B. L., Babatunde, G. M.; Oyenuga, V. A. (1977). The value of palm kernel meal in finishing meal diets for pigs. 2. The effect of the addition of cane molasses on the utilizations of high level palm kernel meal diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 663–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Science-National Research Council (1973). Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 7th edn.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Oyenuga, V. A. (1961). Nutritive value of cereal and cassava diets for growing and fattening pigs in Nigeria. British Journal of Nutrition 15, 327–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, C. A.; Hansen-Smith, F. M. (1978). Comparison of the chemical and biochemical composition of thirteen muscles of the rat after dietary protein restriction. British Journal of Nutrition 39, 647–658.Google Scholar
Steel, K. G. D.Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Steinbach, J. (1971). Effect of season and breed on sow performance in the seasonal equatorial climate of southern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 331–336.Google Scholar