Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:29:10.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) to bacterial seed inoculation and application of phosphorus fertilizer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. K. Kothari  and
C. S. Saraf
S. K. Kothari
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
C. S. Saraf
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nitrogen fixing, free-living, organisms like Azotobacter and Azospirillum are known to increase the nodulation and efficiency oiRhizobium (Krasilinikov & Korenyakov, 1944). The beneficial effect of incorporation of Azotobacter with Rhizobium may be due to the production of auxins (Vancura & Macura, 1960) and prolonged survival of Rhizobium in the presence of a large amount of polysaccharide gums (Krasilinikov & Korenyakov, 1944). In green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek), because of high temperature and unavoidable soil moisture stress during hot and dry summer months (April-June), survival of the seed-inoculated Rhizobium is very poor (Lai, Dubey & Chandra, 1983). In the present study attempts were made to improve the efficiency cf Rhizobium as an inoculant by the use of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 463 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrew, C. S. (1976). Nutritional restraints on legumesymbiosis. In Exploiting the legume Rhizobium symbiosis in Tropical Agriculture (ed. Vincent, J. M.). University of Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture, Miscellaneous Bulletin 145.Google Scholar
Graham, P. H. & Rosac, J. C. (1979). Phosphorus fertilization and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean. Agronomy Journal 71 (6), 925–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited.Google Scholar
Jones, F. R. & Tisdale, W. B. (1921). Effect of soil temperature upon the development of nodules on the roots of certain legumes. Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 17–31.Google Scholar
Krasilinikov, N. A. & Korenyakov, A. I. (1944). Influence of soil bacteria on the virulence and activity of Rhizobium. Microbiologiya 13, 39.Google Scholar
Lal, S. S., Dubey, R. S. & Chandra, S. (1983). Summer mung yields can be tripled. Indian Farming 33 (1), 9–11.Google Scholar
Nair, C. S. & Aiyer, R. S. (1979). Effect of liming and application of Mussorie phosphate on the yield of green gram var. Co. 1 grown in upland laterites of Kerala State. Agriculture Research Journal, India 17 (2), 189–193.Google Scholar
Panwar, K. S. & Singh, R. P. N. (1981). Irrigation scheduling and phosphatic fertilization of Summer mung. Pulse Crops News Letter 1 (1), 93–94.Google Scholar
Shankar, H. & Kushwaha, R. P. S. (1971). Chemical composition of Urd plants (Phaseolus mungo) at various stages of growth. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 79–82.Google Scholar
Singh, G., Manohar, R. S. & Bajpai, M. R. (1982). Growth and yield of green gram as affected by levels of P2O5, and foliar application of microelements. Transactions of Indian Society of Desert Technology and University Centre of Desert studies, SKN College of Agriculture, Jobner, Rajasthan, India 7 (1), 32–35.Google Scholar
Vancura, V. & Macura, J. (1960). Indole derivatives in Azotobacter cultures. Folia Microbiologiya 5A, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasimalal, M. P. & Subramanian, S. (1980). Response of green gram to irrigation and phosphorus. Madras Agricultural Journal, India 67 (8), 506–509.Google Scholar