Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:03:35.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of canopy structure, light interception and grain yield to plant density in maize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2018

J. Li ,
R. Z. Xie ,
K. R. Wang ,
P. Hou ,
B. Ming ,
G. Q. Zhang ,
G. Z. Liu ,
M. Wu ,
Z. S. Yang  and
S. K. Li
J. Li
Affiliation:
Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, China
R. Z. Xie*
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
K. R. Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
P. Hou
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
B. Ming
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
G. Q. Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
G. Z. Liu
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
M. Wu
Affiliation:
Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, China
Z. S. Yang
Affiliation:
Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, China
S. K. Li*
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author for correspondence: R. Z. Xie, E-mail: [email protected] and S. K. Li, E-mail: [email protected]
Author for correspondence: R. Z. Xie, E-mail: [email protected] and S. K. Li, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Good canopy structure is essential for optimal maize (Zea mays L.) production. However, creating appropriate maize canopy structure can be difficult, because the characteristics of individual plants are altered by changes in plant age, density and interactions with neighbouring plants. The objective of the current study was to find a reliable method for building good maize canopy structure by analysing changes in canopy structure, light distribution and grain yield (GY). A modern maize cultivar (ZhengDan958) was planted at 12 densities ranging from 1.5 to 18 plants/m2 at two field locations in Xinjiang, China. At the silking stage (R1), plant and ear height increased with plant density as well as leaf area index (LAI), whereas leaf area per plant decreased logarithmically. The fraction of light intercepted by the plant (F) increased with increasing plant density, but the light extinction coefficient (K) decreased linearly from 0.61 to 0.39. Taking the optimum value of F (95%) as an example, and using measured values of K for each plant density at R1 and the equation from Beer's law, the corresponding (theoretical) LAI for each plant density was calculated and optimum plant density (9.72 plants/m2) obtained by calculating the difference between theoretical LAIs and actual observations. Further analysis showed that plant density ranging from 10.64 to 11.55 plants/m2 yielded a stable GY range. Therefore, taking into account the persistence time for maximum LAI, the plant density required to obtain an ideal GY maize canopy structure should be increased by 10–18% from 9.72 plants/m2.

Keywords

Canopy structurelight distributionmaizeplant densitytemporal–spatial variability
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 6 , August 2018 , pp. 785 - 794
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, FH, Uhart, SA, Arguissain, GG and Ruiz, RA (1992) Radiation use efficiency of maize growing in a cool area. Field Crops Research 28, 345–354.Google Scholar
Andrade, FH, Calvïno, P, Cirilo, A and Barbieri, P (2002) Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal 94, 975–980.Google Scholar
Barbieri, PA, Sainz Rozas, HR, Andrade, FH and Echeverria, HE (2000) Row spacing effects at different levels of nitrogen availability in maize. Agronomy Journal 92, 283–288.Google Scholar
Bolaños, J and Edmeades, GO (1993) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization. Field Crops Research 31, 233–252.Google Scholar
Borrás, L, Maddonni, GA and Otegui, ME (2003) Leaf senescence in maize hybrids: plant population, row spacing and kernel set effects. Field Crops Research 82, 13–26.Google Scholar
Chen, GP, Gao, JL, Zhao, M, Dong, ST, Li, SK, Li, SK, Yang, QF, Liu, YH, Wang, LC, Xue, JQ, Liu, JG, Li, CH, Wang, YH, Wang, YD, Song, HX and Zhao, JR (2012) Distribution, yield structure, and key cultural techniques of maize super-high yield plots in recent years. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 38, 80–85.Google Scholar
Cox, WJ (1996) Whole plant physiological and yield responses of maize to plant population. Agronomy Journal 88, 489–496.Google Scholar
Edwards, JT, Purcell, LC and Vories, ED (2005) Light interception and yield potential of short-season maize hybrids in the midsouth. Agronomy Journal 97, 225–234.Google Scholar
Flenet, F, Kiniry, JR, Board, JE, Westgate, ME and Reicosky, DC (1996) Row spacing effects on light extinction coefficients of corn, sorghum, soybean, and sunflower. Agronomy Journal 88, 185–190.Google Scholar
Girardin, PH and Tollenaar, M (1994) Effects of intraspecific interference on maize leaf azimuth. Crop Science 34, 151–155.Google Scholar
Hikosaka, K and Hirose, T (1997) Leaf angle as a strategy for light competition: optimal and evolutionarily stable light-extinction coefficient within a leaf canopy. Ecoscience 4, 501–507.Google Scholar
Jones, CA, Kiniry, JR and Dyke, PT (1986) CERES-Maize: A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development. College Station, TX, USA: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar
Li, SK and Wang, CT (2010) Potential and Ways to High Yield in Maize. Beijing, China: Science Press.Google Scholar
Li, J, Xie, RZ, Wang, KR, Hou, P, Ming, B, Guo, YQ, Sun, YL, Zhang, GQ, Zhao, RL and Li, SK (2015 a) Changes in plant-to-plant variability among maize individuals and their relationships with plant density and grain yield. Philippine Agricultural Scientist 98, 89–97.Google Scholar
Li, J, Xie, RZ, Wang, KR, Ming, B, Guo, YQ, Zhang, GQ and Li, SK (2015 b) Variations in maize dry matter, harvest index, and grain yield with plant density. Agronomy Journal 107, 829–834.Google Scholar
Li, W, Niu, Z, Chen, HY and Li, D (2017) Characterizing canopy structural complexity for the estimation of maize LAI based on ALS data and UAV stereo images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 38, 2106–2116.Google Scholar
Liu, T, Song, F, Liu, S and Zhu, X (2011) Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthetic characteristics under different narrow-wide planting patterns in maize at silking stage. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 1249–1261.Google Scholar
Maddonni, GA, Chelle, M, Drouet, JL and Andrieu, B (2001 a) Light interception of contrasting azimuth canopies under square and rectangular plant spatial distributions: simulations and crop measurements. Field Crops Research 70, 1–13.Google Scholar
Maddonni, GA, Otegui, ME and Cirilo, AG (2001 b) Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crops Research 71, 183–193.Google Scholar
Maddonni, GA, Cirilo, AG and Otegui, ME (2006) Row width and maize grain yield. Agronomy Journal 98, 1532–1543.Google Scholar
Major, DJ, Beasley, BW and Hamilton, RI (1991) Effect of maize maturity on radiation-use efficiency. Agronomy Journal 83, 895–903.Google Scholar
Montgomery, EC (1911) Correlation Studies in Corn. Annual Report no. 24. Lincoln, NE, USA: Nebraska AgricExp, Stn.Google Scholar
Ottman, MJ and Welch, LF (1989) Planting patterns and radiation interception, plant nutrient concentration, and yield in corn. Agronomy Journal 81, 167–174.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, AP and Pararajasingham, S (1997) The influence of plant spacing on light interception and use in greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): a review. Scientia Horticulturae 69, l–29.Google Scholar
Pearce, RB, Brown, RH and Blaser, ER (1965) Relationships between leaf area index, light interception and net photosynthesis in Orchardgrass. Crop Science 5, 553–556.Google Scholar
Pepper, GE, Pearce, RB and Mock, JJ (1977) Leaf orientation and yield of maize. Crop Science 17, 883–886.Google Scholar
Ritchie, SW, Hanway, JJ and Benson, GO (1986) How a Corn Plant Develops. Special Report no. 48. Ames, IA, USA: Cooperative Extension Service. Iowa State University of Science and Technology/USDA.Google Scholar
Stewart, DW, Costa, C, Dwyer, LM, Smith, DL, Hamilton, RI and Ma, BL (2003) Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize. Agronomy Journal 95, 1465–1474.Google Scholar
Tharakan, PJ, Volk, TA, Nowak, CA and Ofezu, GJ (2008) Assessment of canopy structure, light interception, and light-use efficiency of first year regrowth of shrub willow (Salixsp.). BioEnergy Research 1, 229–238.Google Scholar
Tokatlidis, IS and Koutroubas, SD (2004) A review of maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Research 88, 103–114.Google Scholar
Toler, JE, Murdock, EC, Stapleton, GS and Wallace, SU (1999) Corn leaf orientation effects on light interception, intraspecific competition, and grain yields. Journal of Production Agriculture 12, 396–399.Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M and Bruulsema, TW (1988) Efficiency of maize dry matter production during periods of complete leaf area expansion. Agronomy Journal 80, 580–585.Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M and Lee, EA (2002) Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Research 75, 161–169.Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M, Dibo, AA, Aguilara, A, Weise, SF and Swanton, CJ (1994) Effect of crop density on weed interference in maize. Agronomy Journal 86, 591–595.Google Scholar
Torres, GM, Koller, A, Taylor, R and Raun, WR (2017) Seed-oriented planting improves light interception, radiation use efficiency and grain yield of maize. Experimental Agriculture 53, 210–225.Google Scholar
Turc, O, Bouteille, M, Fuad-Hassan, A, Welcker, C and Tardieu, F (2016) The growth of vegetative and reproductive structures (leaves and silks) respond similarly to hydraulic cues in maize. New Phytologist 212, 377–388.Google Scholar
Wang, K, Wang, KR, Wang, YH, Zhao, J, Zhao, RL, Wang, XM, Li, J, Liang, MX and Li, SK (2012) Effects of density on maize yield and yield components. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 45, 3437–3445.Google Scholar
Watiki, JM, Fukai, S, Banda, JA and Keating, BA (1993) Radiation interception and growth of maize/cowpea intercrop as affected by maize plant density and cowpea cultivar. Field Crops Research 35, 123–133.Google Scholar
Westgate, ME, Forcella, F, Reicosky, DC and Somsen, J (1997) Rapid canopy closure for maize production in the northern US corn belt: radiation-use efficiency and grain yield. Field Crops Research 49, 249–258.Google Scholar
Widdicombe, WD and Thelen, KD (2002) Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the northern corn belt. Agronomy Journal 94, 1020–1023.Google Scholar
Zhang, CZ, Zhang, JB, Zhang, H, Zhao, JH, Wu, QC, Zhao, ZH and Cai, TY (2015) Mechanisms for the relationships between water-use efficiency and carbon isotope composition and specific leaf area of maize under water stress. Plant Growth Regulation 77, 233–243.Google Scholar