Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:33:18.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response by sugar beet to superphosphate, particularly in relation to soils containing little available phosphorus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
M. J. Durrant
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

Summary

Twenty experiments between 1970 and 1974 tested the effect of five amounts of triple superphosphate (0–110 kg P/ha) on sugar-beet yield in fields where soil contained little sodium bicarbonate-soluble phosphorus. The average yield without phosphorus fertilizer was 6·69 t/ha sugar and the increase from the optimum dressing 0·46 t/ha; the average soil concentration was 12 mg P/l. The fertilizer increased yield by 0·77 t/ha sugar on fields with 0–9 mg/l soil phosphorus, by 0·31 t/ha when soil phosphorus was 10–15 mg/l and had little effect on soils containing larger amounts.

The concentration of phosphorus in plants harvested in mid-summer contained on average 0·29% P in dried tops and 0·13% in roots when given no phosphorus fertilizer, representing a total of 19·3 kg/ha P uptake. Giving superphosphate increased the phosphorus in both dried tops and roots by up to 0·03% and there was 3·7 and 1·7 kg/ha more phosphorus in tops and roots respectively. On the most responsive fields (0–9 mg/l soil P), the fertilizer increased the phosphorus in tops and roots by 0·05% and total uptake by 7 kg P/ha. The increase in uptake (or recovery) of fertilizer varied from 15% when 14 kg P/ha was given to less than 5% when 110 kg P/ha was used.

A dressing of 27 kg P/ha was adequate for maximum yield on 19 of the 20 fields. When fields were grouped, 0–9, 10–15, 16–25 and > 26 mg/l NaHCO3-soluble soil phosphorus, and taking into account the value of the increased sugar yield, the cost of the fertilizer and its residual value, 60, 30, 20 and 10 kg P/ha respectively were the most profitable dressings. These experiments provide evidence, however, that the fertilizer would be used more efficiently if fields containing 0–9 mg soil phosphorus were subdivided into those with 0–4·5 and those with 4·6–9·0 mg/l and the groups given 80 and 40 kg P/ha respectively. These recommendations are substantially less than those used at present; they are adequate for sugar beet but other crops in the rotation would need similar close examination to ensure maximum yield and maintain adequate soil reserves of phosphorus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (1973). Fertilizer recommendations. Bulletin 209, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Church, B. M. (1975). Survey of fertilizer practice. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Rothamsted Experimental Station and Fertilizer Manufacturers' Association.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1967). The Control of Soil Fertility. London: Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1970). The relationship between exchangeable soil magnesium and response by sugar beet to magnesium sulphate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Boyd, D. A. (1971). The relationship between soil phosphorus and response by sugar beet to phosphate fertilizer on mineral soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 117–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Last, P. J. (1974). Effect of fertilizers on sugar beet quality. International Sugar Journal 76, 355–8.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Webb, D. J. (1972). Long-term effects of fertilizers at Broom's Barn, 1965–70. Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1971, Part 2, 155–64.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Draycott, A. P. & Boyd, D. A. (1974). The response of sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 427–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A. E. (1969). Plant nutrients in Broadbalk Soils. Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1968, Part 2, 93115.Google Scholar
Mattinoly, G. E. G., Chater, M. & Poulton, P. B. (1974). The Woburn Organic Manuring Experiment. II. Soil analysis, 1964–72, with special reference to changes in carbon and nitrogen. Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1973, Part 2, 134–51.Google Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. G., Johnston, A. E. & Chater, M. (1970). The residual value of farmyard manure and superphosphate in the Saxmundham Botation II Experiment, 1899–1968. Report of the Rothamsted Station for 1969, Part 2, 91112.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. B., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture. Circular Number 939.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Gabdner, R., Schmehl, W. R., Watanabe, F. S. & Scott, C. O. (1950). Utilisation of phosphorus from various fertilizer materials by sugar beets in Colorado. Proceedings of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 6, 317–31.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Williams, B. J. B. (1967). Besults of an experiment at Woburn testing farmyard manure and N, P and K fertilizers on five arable crops and a long ley. II. N, P and K removed by the crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 293300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar