Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:24:02.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual effects of a slant-legged subsoiler on shoot growth and grain yield of spring barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. A. Hipps  and
D. R. Hodgson
N. A. Hipps
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Sciences Building, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
D. R. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Sciences Building, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a long-term cultivation experiment comparing mouldboard ploughing, shallow cultivation and direct drilling, soil compaction was identified as a problem. Root growth was restricted and this possibly caused a decline in grain yield of spring barley. The residual effects of a slant-legged subsoiler (Trade name, ‘Paraplow’) on the growth and yield of spring barley up to 34 months after its use were measured.

In 1982, soil not loosened with the ‘Paraplow’ had a grain yield of 5·16 t/ha and cultivation with the ‘Paraplow’ either 22 or II months previously had a negligible effect. Although the implement improved mean plant establishment by up to 12 plants/m2, compensatory tillering occurred in the treatments that initially had fewer plants, thus reducing differences in dry-matter production and grain yield at harvest. The long-term system of cultivation had a larger effect on grain yield than the ‘Paraplow’ did. Grain production on direct-drilled and shallow cultivated soils exceeded that after mouldboard ploughing by up to 0·55 t/ha (P < 0·05). The ‘Paraplow’ used 22 months previously increased grain yield by 0·47 t/ha on a direct-drilled soil that had become compacted.

In 1983, the emergence of seedlings was low (54%) due to waterlogging of the seed bed between germination and emergence. The ‘Paraplow’ used 8 months previously increased the mean number of plants that emerged by 20 plants/m2. More seedlings survived on the soil loosened by the ‘Paraplow’ because it drained more freely than the undisturbed soil. Cultivating with the ‘Paraplow’ 11, 23 and 34 months previously increased grain yield by 0·27, 0·29 and 0·13 t/ha respectively, but the mean grain yield was only 2·70 t/ha. This improvement was caused by a greater number of grains per m2 on the soils loosened with the ‘Paraplow’. Grain weight was unaffected by cultivation system or by ‘Paraplow’ treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 111 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 385 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, B. W. (1980). Soil classification for England and Wales (Higher Categories). Soil Survey Technical Monograph, no. 14, Harpenden, U.K.Google Scholar
Belford, R. K. & Thomson, R. J. (1981). Effects of waterlogging on the growth and yield of winter barley. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 403–411.Google Scholar
Braim, M. A., Chaney, K. & Hodgson, D. R. (1984). Preliminary investigation on the response of spring barley to soil cultivation with the ‘Paraplow’. Soil and Tillage Research 4, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, K., Hodgson, D. R. & Braim, M. A. (1985). The effects of direct drilling, shallow cultivation and ploughing on some soil physical properties in a long-term experiment on spring barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. B., Pidgeon, J. D., Lord, E. & Gowman, M. (1982). Responses to deep loosening by the ‘Paraplow’ in continuous cereal production. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organisation. Osijek, Yugoslavia, 1982, pp. 591–596.Google Scholar
Hipps, N. A. (1985). The effects of a slant-legged subsoiler on soil physical conditions and the growth of cereals. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Hipps, N. A. & Hodgson, D. R. (1987). The effect of a slantlegged subsoiler on soil compaction and the growth of direct-drilled winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipps, N. A. & Hodgson, D. R. (1988). Residual effects of a slant-legged subsoiler on some soil physical conditions and the root growth of spring barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110, 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, D. R., Proud, J. R. & Browne, S. (1977). Cultivation systems for spring barley with special reference to direct drilling (1971–1974). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pidgeon, J. D. (1982). ‘Paraplow’ – a rational approach to soil management. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organisation, Osijek, Yugoslavia, 1982, pp. 633–638.Google Scholar
Swain, R. W. (1975). Subsoiling. In Soil Physical Conditions and Crop Production, Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, Technical Bulletin no. 29, pp. 189–204.London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar