Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:23:28.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between the lean content of joints and overall lean content in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. J. Kempster  and
D. W. Jones
A. J. Kempster
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
D. W. Jones
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Dissection data for 753 steer carcasses from 17 breed-type x feeding system groups were used to examine the prediction of lean content in the side (half carcass) from the lean content of standardized wholesale joints. Different prediction equations were examined and the joints compared both in terms of predictive precision and the stability of their prediction equations between groups.

The relative precision of the joints for predicting weight of lean in the side depended on whether or not the prediction equation included joint weight. With side weight and weight of lean in joint as independent variates, there was little difference between most joints in precision, and the smaller joints, shin and leg (hind shin) appeared to be best because they are convenient and easy to dissect. The addition of joint weight to the equation improved considerably the precision of all the joints except the shin and leg. The coast and top piece gave the most precise predictions with the trivariate equation (residual standard deviations about the common regression line computed ignoring groups, RSD overall, were 1·44 and 1·48 kg respectively) and the fore rib probably offered the best compromise between cost and precision (RSD overall = 1·82 kg).

The stability of prediction equations between groups was influenced in a similar way by the inclusion of joint weight as an independent variate. The joints which gave the most precise predictions tended to have the most stable equations. The average biases between the actual group means and the means predicted using the trivariate equation computed ignoring groups were ± 0·46, ± 0·49 and ± 0·76 kg for the top piece, coast and fore rib respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1977 , pp. 193 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brackelsberg, P. O., Hale, N. S., Cowan, W. A. & Kinsman, D. M. (1968). Relationship of sectional characteristics to beef carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 27, 39–44.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1962). Prediction of muscle content of steer carcasses. Nature 195, 193–4.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1965). The relationship of carcass measurements and dissection data to beef carcass composition. Research in Veterinary Science 6, 24–32.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1962). The relationship between the weight of a tissue in a single joint and the total weight of tissue in a side of beef. Animal Production 4, 37–46.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. A. & Conniffe, D. (1968). Beef carcass evaluation: fat, lean and bone. In Growth and Development of Mammals. Proceedings of the 14th Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham, pp. 389–99. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Cole, J. W., Orme, L. E. & Kincaid, C.M. (1960). Relationships of loin eye area, separable lean of various beef cuts and carcass measurements to total carcass lean in beef. Journal of Animal Science 19, 89–100.Google Scholar
Crown, R. M. & Damon, R. A. (1960). The value of the 12th rib cut for measuring beef carcass yields and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 19, 109–13.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. & Smith, R. J. (1972). Tissue separation - to assess beef and lamb variation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 1, 113–22.Google Scholar
Dinkel, C. A., Wilson, L. L., Tuma, H. J. & Minyard, J. A. (1965). Ratios and percents as measures of carcass traits. Journal of Animal Science 24, 425–9.Google Scholar
Harrington, G. & King, J. W. B. (1963). A note on the prediction of muscular tissue weight in sides of beef. Animal Production 5, 327–8.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. E. & Prescott, J. H. D. (1974). A note on the prediction of carcass composition in beef cattle. Animal Production 19, 115–17.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Avis, P. R. D., Cuthbertson, A. & Smith, R. J. (1974). Prediction of beef carcass composition by sample joint dissection. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 3, 85 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Smith, R. J. (1976). Variation in lean distribution among steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 533–42.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P., Gilliver, B. & Robb, J. M. (1973). An examination of sample joint dissection and specific gravity techniques for assessing the carcass composition of steers slaughtered in commercial abattoirs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 381–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledger, H. P. & Hutchison, H. G. (1962). The value of the tenth rib as a sample joint for the estimation of lean, fat and bone in the carcasses of East African Zebu cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 81–8.Google Scholar
Miller, I. & Weil, W. B. (1963). Some problems in expressing and comparing body composition determined by direct analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 110, 153–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orme, L. E., Cole, J.W., Kincaid, C. M. & Cooper, R. J. (1960). Predicting total carcass lean in mature beef from weights of certain entire muscles. Journal of Animal Science 19, 726–34.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C., Rudman, J. E. & Kemp, C. D. (1961). Relationships between certain carcass measurements, weights of wholesale joints and sample joint composition of Hereford cross-bred steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 57, 347–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. R., Pomeroy, R. W., Harries, J. M. & Ryan, P. O. (1974). Composition of beef carcasses. II. The use of regression equations to estimate total tissue components from observations on intact and quartered sides and partial dissection data. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 79–85.Google Scholar