Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:09:21.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between total yield, number of tubers and yield of large tubers in potato crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Lindsay Burstall ,
M. N. Thomas  and
E. J. Allen
Lindsay Burstall
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, Pembroke Street, Cambridge
M. N. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, Pembroke Street, Cambridge
E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, Pembroke Street, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments were made over 2 years at two sites using three varieties to investigate the relationship between total yield, number of tubers > 1 cm and the yield of tubers in the 60–80 mmsize range. Regressionanalysisrevealed that yield of tubers in the 60–80 mm size range was a linear function of total yield and number of tubers > 1 cm. The effect of changes in tuber shape on this relationship is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 403 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Rawi, A. W. (1981). Effects of storage environment on the growth and development of contrasting varieties of potatoes. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. (1966). Effect of soil temperature at different growth stages on growth and development of potato plants. Agronomy Journal 58, 169–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, C. A. H. & Seale, R. S. (1966). Soils of the District around Cambridge. Harpenden.Google Scholar
MacKerron, D. K. L. & Waister, P. D. (1985). A simple model of potato growth and yield. I. Model development and sensitivity analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorolgy 34, 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1986). Recommended List of Potatoes, 1986/87.Google Scholar
Neumann, H. (1925). The effect of environmental conditions on the potato tuber. Journal für Landwirtschaft 73, 7–38, abstracted in Experimental Station Record (1926) 54, 638–639.Google Scholar
Powell, F. C. (1982). Statistical Tables for the Social, Biological and Physical Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reust, W. & Munster, J. (1978). Facteurs reponsables de la variation de la forme des tubercules de pommes de terre. Revue Suisse Agriculture 10 (1), 13–17.Google Scholar
Sands, P. J., Hackett, C. & Nix, H. A. (1979). A model of the development and bulking of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). I. Derivation from well-managed field crops. Field Crops Research 2, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P. J. & Regel, P. A. (1983). A model of the development and bulking of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). V. A simple model forpredictinggraded yields. Field Crops Research 6, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, G. G. & Schoenemann, J. A. (1985). Influence of reduced and split rates of maleic hydrazide on Russet Burbank potatoes. American Potato Journal 62, 449.Google Scholar
Wohrmann, K. (1966). On the influence of external factors on properties of potato tubers. Der Zuchter 36, 90–95.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M., Timm, H. & Spurr, A. R. (1964). Effects of soil temperature on growth and nutrition of potato plants and tuberization, composition and periderm structure of tubers. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 84, 412–423.Google Scholar