Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T19:59:08.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relation of shape of canopy to interception of radiation and yield of wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. S. Dhillon  and
D. S. Kler
G. S. Dhillon
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
D. S. Kler
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments were made at the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, during 1974–5 to 1978–9 to study the possibility of improving wheat yield by more efficient use of radiant energy through modification of the shape of the canopy under varying levels of fertilizers, irrigation and seed rates. The results showed substantial yield increase by sowing half the seed and fertilizers in one direction and half in rows at right angles, giving a spacing of 22·5 × 22·5 cm, thereby intercepting more light, which showed a significant direct relationship with yield, but there were negative correlations with soil temperature. The increase in row spacing decreased the yield. With 33% extra fertilizer than the local recommendation, sowing the crop in two directions gave 0·96 t/ha (33·4%) higher yield, whereas none of the other sowing methods showed significant increase. Mixing varieties to form a prismatic canopy gave higher yield than the mean of the varieties sown alone. Irrigating the crop more than thrice did not prove beneficial. North-south row direction tended to improve yield compared with east-west rows. Seed rates varying from 50 to 200 kg/ha showed neither significant effect, nor interaction with canopy shape except in 1978–9 when 150 kg seed/ha showed yield improvement over 100 kg/ha.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , August 1981 , pp. 135 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonner, J. (1962). The upper limit of crop yields. Science 137, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denmead, O. T. (1969). Comparative miorometeorology of a wheat field and a forest of Pinus radiata. Agro-Meteorology 6, 357–371.Google Scholar
Denmead, O. T. (1970). Transfer processes between vegetation and air: measurement, interpretation and modelling. In Prediction and Measurement of Photosynthetic Productivity, pp. 149–164. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Dhillon, G. S., Kler, D. S., Walia, A. S. & Randhawa, S. S. (1978). Utilization of solar energy for crop production. II. Canopy architecture studies in maize, sorghum and pearl millet fodders. Abstracts International Symposium on Biological application of solar energy, held at Madurai (India) on Dec. 1–5, 1978, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Dhillon, G. S., Singh, B. & Kler, D. S. (1979). Efficient use of solar energy for crop production. I. Effect of row direction on wheat yield with different sowing dates, plant population and fertilizer levels. Indian Journal of Agronomy 24, 322–325.Google Scholar
Friend, D. J. C. (1965 a). Tillering and leaf production in wheat as affected by temperature and light intensity. Canadian Journal of Botany 43, 1063–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, D. J. C. (1965 b). Ear length and spikelet number of wheat grown at different temperatures and light intensities. Canadian Journal of Botany 43, 345–353.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1977). Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, D. S. & Dhillon, G. S. (1980). Effect of stand geometry on crop yield and incidence of powdery mildew. Abridged Annual Research Report, 1979–80, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 22.Google Scholar
Khalil, M. S. H. (1956). The interrelation between growth and development of wheat as influenced by temperature, light and nitrogen. Meded Landbouwhogesch, Wageningen 56, 1–73.Google Scholar
King, R. W., Wardlaw, I. F. & Evans, L. T. (1967). Effect of assimilate utilisation on photosynthetio rate in wheat. Planta, Berlin 77, 261–276.Google Scholar
Moss, D. N. (1964). Optimum lighting of leaves. Crop Science 4, 131–136.Google Scholar
Pendleton, J. W. & Weibel, R. O. (1965). Shading studies on winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 57, 292–293.Google Scholar
Porter, K. B., Jensen, H. E. & Sletten, W. H. (1960). The effect of row spacing, fertilizer and planting rate on the yield and water use of irrigated grain sorghum. Agronomy Journal 52, 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puckridge, D. W. (1969). Photosynthesis of wheat under field conditions. II. Effeot of defoliation on the carbon dioxide uptake of the community. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 623–634.Google Scholar
Rawson, H. M. (1971). Tillering patterns in wheat with special reference to the shoot at the coleoptile node. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 24, 829–841.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. N. & Prasad, R. (1978). Systematic mixed versus pure stands of wheat genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 441–444.Google Scholar
Shekhawat, G. S., Sharma, D. C. & Gupta, M. B. (1966). Wheat growth and production in relation to row spacing and direction of sowing. Indian Journal of Agronomy 11, 62–65.Google Scholar
Shirley, H. L. (1929). The influence of light intensity and light quality upon the growth and survival of plants. American Journal of Botany 16, 354–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardlaw, I. F. (1970). The early stages of grain development in wheat: response to light and temperature in a single variety. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 23, 765–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Holliday, R. (1971). Plant population, shading and thinning studies in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 453–461.Google Scholar