Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:07:12.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems in determining the best levels of essential nutrients in feedingstuffs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. M. Lerman
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DX
S. W. Bie
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DX

Summary

Two obstacles to achieving diets which maximize farm profits are discussed: (1) the continuing inability to predict reliably the response of animals to a diet with any given composition, and (2) batch-to-batch variation in the true nutrient content of a diet with a fixed nominalcontent. With the aid of simple practical examples it is demonstrated that diet recommendations can be more sensitive than might be expected to the type of function used to predict response, and that variation in dietary nutrient content may reduce farm profits (though the size of the reduction is not clear because of (1) above).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

A.R.C. (1967). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, london, England.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. S. (1969). Economic analysis and livestock feeding. Journal of Agricultural Economics 20, 323–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battese, G. E., Duloy, J.H., Holder, J.M. & Wilson, B. R. (1968). The determination of optimal rations for pigs fed separated milk and grain. Journal of Agricultural Economics 19, 355–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bie, S. W. (1971). Effects of the variability of feed ingredients on the formulation of economic diets for pigs and poultry. Diploma thesis, Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1961). Economics and animal husbandry. Journal of Agricultural Economics 14, 308–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, D. J. & Gesell, J. A. (1961). Studies with cornsoya laying diets. 4. Poultry Science 40, 1328–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. (1972). Problems in the use of protein and amino acid values in feed composition tables. Proceedings of the Georgia Nutrition Conference, pp. 8193.Google Scholar
Chen, J. T. (1973). Quadratic programming for leastcost feed formulation under probabilistic protein constraints. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 55, 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curnow, R. N. (1973). A smooth population response curve based on an abrupt threshold and plateau model for individuals. Biometrics 29, 110.Google Scholar
Dent, J. B. (1964). Optimal rations for livestock with special reference to bacon pigs. Journal of Agricultural Economics 16, 6887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C. (1970). Studies on the protein and amino acid requirements of the laying hen. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading, England.Google Scholar
Miles, S. R. & Quackenbush, F. W. (1955). Reliability of chemical analyses for fertilizers and feeds. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 38, 108–30.Google Scholar
Sharpe, P. R. & Dent, J. B. (1966). Some economic aspects of the use of growth stimulants in the nutrition of the bacon pig. Farm management section report, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, England. Study No. 1.Google Scholar
Wragg, S. R. (1970). Cooperative research in agriculture and the provision of input/output coefficients. Journal of Agricultural Economics 21, 85103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar