Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:07:45.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The principles of orthogonality and confounding in replicated experiments. (With Seven Text-figures.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. Yates
F. Yates
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Viii. summary

The principle of orthogonality in replicated experiments is discussed and the dangers of non-orthogonality emphasised. The modifications necessary in the ordinary procedure of the analysis of variance when applied to non-orthogonal data are developed, attention being paid to the shorter methods, applicable in certain cases, by which the heavy labour of computation necessary in the general method of fitting constants may be avoided.

Certain modifications in the design of replicated experiments, usually designated by the term confounding, are explained. The different types of confounding are discussed, together with their uses, and the appropriate methods of analysis are set out. The methods are applied to the analysis of an experiment on sugar beet (where a previous incorrect analysis is corrected) and an experiment on potatoes.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1933 , pp. 108 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Wishart, J.The analysis of variance illustrated in its application to a complex agricultural experiment on sugar beet. Arch, für Pflanzenbau (1931), 5, 561.Google Scholar
(2)Fisher, R. A. and Wishart, J.The arrangement of field experiments and the statistical reduction of the results. Imperial Bureau of Soil Science, Technical Communication (1930), No. 10.Google Scholar
(3)Eden, T. and Fisher, R. A.Studies in crop variation. VI. Experiments on the response to potash and nitrogen. J. Agric. Sci. (1929), 19, 201.Google Scholar
(4)Fisher, R. A.The arrangement of field experiments. J. Min. Agric. (1926), 33, 503.Google Scholar
(5)Fisher, R. A.Statistical Methods for Research Workers (1925). Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. (4th Edition, 1932.)Google Scholar
(6)Allan, F. E. and Wishart, J.A method of estimating the yield of a missing plot in field experimental work. J. Agric. Sci. (1930), 20, 399.Google Scholar
(7)Fisher, R. A.Applications of Student's distribution. Metron. (1925), 5, 1.Google Scholar
(8)Irwin, J. O.Mathematical theorems involved in the analysis of variance. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. (1931), 94, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar