Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:13:33.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The potential digestibility of cellulose in forage and faeces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. J. Wilkins
B. J. Wilkins
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of New England, Australia*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The potential digestibility of cellulose is defined as the maximum digestibility obtainable when the conditions and duration of digestion are not limiting factors. Techniques for measuring potential cellulose digestibility were examined and the relationship between potential cellulose digestibility and in vivo cellulose digestibility was explored for a range of grasses.

Cellulose digestibility was found to reach a maximum value after 5 days incubation in vitro. No further cellulose was digested when the residues from an initial incubation for 6 days were incubated with a second rumen liquor inoculum. The values measured after a single incubation of 6 days duration were similar to cellulose digestibility coefficients measured by the suspension of ground forage samples in nylon bags in the rumen for 6 days. Plant factors appear to limit further digestion and the residue from prolonged digestion in vitro consisted only of lignified and cutinized tissue. Potential cellulose digestibility measured by either of the above techniques was higher than cellulose digestibility in vivo. The difference varied between forages and when the difference was large, the digestibility of cellulose in faeces was high.

It is suggested that measurements of the potential digestibility of cellulose in feed and faeces may be of use in estimating the digestibility of grazed herbage.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , August 1969 , pp. 57 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, R. W. (1965). Quantitative studies of digestion in the reticulo-rumen. II. The digestion of insoluble carbohydrates in the reticulo-rumen. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 25, 85–95.Google Scholar
Barnes, R. F., Mott, G. O., Packett, L. V. & Plumlee, M. (1964). Comparison of in vitro rumen fermentation methods. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 1061–5.Google Scholar
Barnett, A. G. (1957). Studios on the digestibility of the cellulose fraction of grassland products. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49, 467–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bath, I. H. (1958). The ultra-violet spectrophotometric determination of sugars and uronic acids. Analyst, Lond. 83, 451–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep and on related problems. Br. J. Nutr. 10, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campling, B. C. & Freer, M. (1961). The effect of urea on the voluntary intake of oat straw by cattle. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 20, xvi.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. & Balch, C. C. (1962). Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. III. The effect of urea on the voluntary intake of oat straw. Br. J. Nutr. 16, 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nutr. 15, 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. O., Jones, D. I. H. & Milton, W. E. J. (1959). Factors influencing the composition and nutritive value of herbage from fescue and molinia areas. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 268–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehority, B. A. & Johnson, R. R. (1960). Effect of ball milling upon in vitro digestibility of cellulose of mature forages. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1257–8.Google Scholar
Ellis, W. C. & Pfander, W. H. (1958). The influence of varied cellulose and nitrogen levels upon ration digestibility and nitrogen balance of lambs fed semipurified rations. J. Nutr. 65, 235–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimes, R. C., Watkin, B. R. & Gallagher, J. R. (1966). An evaluation of pasture quality with young grazing sheep. II. Chemical composition, botanical composition and in vitro digestibility of herbage selected by oesophogeal-fistulated sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 113–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, E. B., Duncan, C. W. & Huffman, C. F. (1947). Rumen digestion studies. II. Studies in the chemistry of rumen digestion. J. Nutr. 34, 747–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellström, N. & Aamisepp, M. (1965). Digestion. III. Faecal analyses and digestibility. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 16, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1963). Symbiotic associations: the rumen bacteria. XIIIth Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol. pp. 266–97.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. J. & Waite, R. (1965). Studies in the lignification of grasses. I. Perennial ryegrass (S 24) and cocksfoot (S 37). J. agric. Sci., Camb., 64, 211–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneebone, W. R. (1962). A simple rapid, precise staining procedure for identification of lignified tissue in grasses. Crop Sci. 2, 268.Google Scholar
McAnally, R. A. (1942). Digestion of straw by the ruminant. Biochem. J. 36, 392–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenzie, H. A. & Wallace, H. S. (1954). The Kjeldahl determination of nitrogen: a critical study of digestion conditions—temperature, catalyst and oxidizing agent. Aust. J. Chem. 7, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. & Milford, R. (1967). In vitro and faecal nitrogen techniques for predicting the voluntary intake of Chloris gayana. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 22, 170–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, R. J. & Harris, L. E. (1962). Ruminal flora studies in the sheep. X. Influence of nitrogen intake on ruminal function. J. Nutr. 77, 285–98.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. R. & Mora, R. J. (1964). Rumination in sheep. I. The influence of rumination and grinding upon the passage and digestion of food. Aust. J. agric. Res. 15, 635–44.Google Scholar
Quicke, G. V., Bentley, O. G., Scott, H. W. & Moxon, A. L. (1959). Cellulose digestion in vitro as a measure of the digestibility of forage cellulose in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raleigh, R. J. & Wallace, J. D. (1963). Effect of urea at different nitrogen levels on digestibility and on performance of growing steers fed low quality flood meadow roughage. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 330–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regal, V. (1960). The evaluation of quality of pasture grasses by the microscopic method. Proc. VIIIth Int. Grassld Congr. pp. 522–4.Google Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. (1954). Effect of a sub-clinical worm-burden on the digestive efficiency of sheep. J. comp. Path. Ther. 64, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18, 104–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, D. C., Johnson, R. R. & Dehority, B. A. (1965). Relationship of lignification to in vitro cellulose digestibility of grasses and legumes. J. Anim. Sci. 24, 161–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyne, G. M. (1962). Micro-methods for nutritive evaluation of range forages. J. Range Mgmt 15, 303–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, R., Johnston, M. J. & Armstrong, D. G. (1962). The digestibility of the carbohydrate constituents of S. 23 ryegrass cut at four stages of growth. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 21, xxi–xxii.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. (1959). The in vitro digestion of roughage dry matter. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 192–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinmann, H. (1947). Determination of total-available carbohydrates in plants. Pl. Physiol. 22, 279–90.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1966 a). The digestibility of forage and its relationship to lignification. Ph.D. thesis, University of New England.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1966 b). The application, of the in vitro digestion technique to some arid zone fodders. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 21, 65–9.Google Scholar
Yates, N. G. & Allden, W. G. (1966). A study of herbage digestibility using an in vitro fermentation technique. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6, 340–9.Google Scholar