Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:50:42.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The pollination requirements of swede rape (Brassica napus L.) and of turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Ingrid H. Williams
Ingrid H. Williams
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The pollination requirements of eight cultivars of swede rape (Brassica napus) and two of turnip rape (Brassica campestris) grown in a glasshouse, were compared. Cultivars differed in the number of pods, and of seeds per pod set by auto-pollination. Cultivars of turnip rape yielded more when cross-pollinated than when self-pollinated by hand but those of swede rape did not, although additional pollination of swede rape increased the set of early flowers. Inadequate pollination probably limits yield in self-fertile cultivars of swede rape that auto-pollinate poorly and in turnip rape cultivars that are nearly self-sterile.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 91 , Issue 2 , October 1978 , pp. 343 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Canadian Department of Agriculture (1961). Rape Research Report of the Saskatoon Research Station 1957–1962, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Downey, R. K. & Bolton, J. L. (1961). Production of (Polish and Argentine) Rape in Western Canada. Canadian Department of Agriculture Research Publication 1021, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Fechner, E. (1927). Untersuohungen Uber die Einwirkung eines Ruckganges der Bienenzuoht auf den Samenertrag einiger landwirtsohtlichen Kulturpflanzen. Archiv für Bienenkunde 8, 1–72.Google Scholar
Free, J. B. & Nuttall, P. M. (1968). The pollination of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and the behaviour of bees on the crop. Journal of Agriculturl Science, Cambridge 71, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harle, A. (1948). 1st der Rapsglanzkafer (Meligethes aeneus Fabr.) nur ein Schädling? Nachrichtenblatt für den Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienst Berlin 2, 40–42.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, J. G. & Glynne-Jones, G. D. (1953). Observations on the pollination of oil rape and broccoli. Bee World 34, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutensky, J. (1959). Opylovací ú`inek včely medonosné (Apis tnellifera L.) na zvýšení hektarových výnosù u řepky olejné a hořčice bilé. Sbornik Ceskoslovenské Akademie Zèmědělských Véd. 5, 571–582.Google Scholar
Mohammed, A. (1935). Pollination studies in toria (Brassica napus L. var. dichotoma Prain.) and sarson (Brassica campestris L. var. sarson, Prain.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 5, 125–154.Google Scholar
Olsson, G. & Persson, Brita (1958). Inkorsningsgrad och sjalvstorilitet hos raps. Sveriges Utsädesförenings Tidskrift 68, 74–78.Google Scholar
Pritsch, G. (1965). UntersuchungenÜber die Steigerung der Ölfrachtertrage durch Honigbienen. Vědecké prace Výzkumného Ústavu Rostlinné Výrobý Čsazv v Prace-Ruzyne 4, 157–163.Google Scholar
Tayo, T. O. & Morgan, D. G. (1975). Quantitative analysis of the growth, development and distribution of flowers and pods in oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 108–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veselý, V. (1962). Vyjádřeni ékonomické účinnosti opylovaci činnosti včel na řepce ozimé (Brassica napus L. var. oleifera Metz.). Sbornik Ceskoslovenské Akademie Věd. Zemědělských Ekonomie 35, 659–678.Google Scholar