Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:51:13.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planting materials for warm tropic potato production: production and field performance of nursery-produced tubers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. S. Benz ,
E. R. Keller  and
D. J. Midmore
J. S. Benz
Affiliation:
International Potato Center, Apartado 5969, Lima, Peru
E. R. Keller
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
D. J. Midmore
Affiliation:
International Potato Center, Apartado 5969, Lima, Peru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Potato production in the lowland tropics is constrained by lack of affordable supplies of planting material. Therefore, the potential to produce in situ tuber seed from true potato seed (TPS) seedlings and rooted stem cuttings under nursery conditions in the warm tropics was studied, and their yields were compared with those of the same materials obtained under cool conditions. Subsequently, their field performance in the warm tropics was evaluated.

Tuber yield from TPS seedlings and rooted cuttings transplanted in nursery beds under warm conditions ranged from 50% to < 20% of that obtained in cool conditions, but reductions in tuber numbers were less marked under warm conditions. Survival of seedlings was less than that of stem cuttings, but tuber numbers of seedlings exceeded those of rooted cuttings by a factor of two or more (e.g. 700 m−2 for seedlings v. 224 m−2 for rooted cuttings). Low tuber number is physiologically inherent in cuttings, as is high tuber number in seedlings. Total tuber yields varied significantly amongst clones grown in the warm climate from rooted cuttings, not always in proportion to the number of tubers produced. Differences in tuber yield and tuber number were less marked between the two TPS progenies studied.

The field comparisons highlighted the 30–40% lower yield potential for warm-climate-produced nursery seed materials. Slower emergence and fewer stems apparently were in part responsible for this effect; however, neither tuber number harvested nor the proportion of marketable tubers was affected by site of production of seed materials. Cutting medium-sized warm-produced tubers (mean 23 g), the use of larger sized whole tubers (10–20 g v. 5–10 g) or increasing the planting density of 5 g tubers from 8·8 to 15·5 plants m-2 significantly increased yields by 4·9, 2·25 and 3·5 t ha-1, respectively, but yields were not increased further by 20–40 g tubers nor by 22·2 plants m-2. Small seedling tubers (≤ 5 g) can potentially lead to high stem numbers per unit weight of tubers, but their success in plant establishment was hampered in warm climates, especially in the presence of soil pathogens. Cool-climate-produced seedling tubers and tubers from cuttings can compete physiologically with field-produced seed tubers when used as planting materials in the warm tropics. However, with few exceptions, no crop from tubers produced under warm conditions could match the performance of crops from similar cool-produced tubers when planted out in the warm tropics.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 127 , Issue 1 , August 1996 , pp. 67 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. (1979). Effects of cutting seed tubers on number of stems and tubers and tuber yields of several potato varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, J. S. (1989). Alternative propagation systems for warm climate potato production. Doctor Tech. Sci. dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Benz, J. S., Keller, E. R. & Midmore, D. J. (1995). Planting materials for warm tropic potato production: growth and yield of transplanted seedlings or rooted cuttings and tuber materials in the field. Field Crops Research 40, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, J. S., Keller, E. R. & Midmore, D. J. (1996). Plant materials for warm tropic potato production: motherplant management for the production of rooted cuttings. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad.Google Scholar
Bryan, J. E., Jackson, M. T. & Melendez, N. G. (1981). Rapid multiplication techniques for potatoes. A Bulletin of the International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
Burstall, L. & Harris, P. M. (1983). The estimation of percentage light interception from leaf area index and percentage ground cover in potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claver, F. K. (1975). Influence of temperature during the formation of potato tubers and its effects on the first progeny. Phyton 33, 1–6.Google Scholar
Cutter, E. G. (1978). Structure and development of the potato plant. In The Potato Crop: The Scientific Basis for Improvement (Ed. Harris, P. M.), pp. 70–152. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H. V. (1984). Mother tuber reserves as factors limiting potato sprout growth. Potato Research 27, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Amin, S. M. (1993). True potato seed based potato technology for the Sudan. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Elango, F. (1986). The role of high soil temperatures in the damping-off of true potato seedlings in the lowland tropics. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 63, 66–67.Google Scholar
Engels, C., El, Bedewy R. & Sattelmacher, B. (1993). Effects of weight and planting density of tubers derived from true potato seed on growth and yield of potato crops in Egypt. 2. Tuber yield and tuber size. Field Crops Research 35, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, E. E. (1981). Heat stress and the tuberization stimulus. American Potato Journal 58, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, E. E., (1985). Physiological studies with cuttings. In Potato Physiology (Ed. Li, P. H.), pp. 156–207. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, E. E. (1987). The role of hormones in potato tuberization. In Plant Hormones and their Role in Plant Growth and Development (Ed. Davies, P. J.), pp. 515–538. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, E. E. & Struik, P. C. (1992). Tuber formation in potato: induction, initiation and growth. Horticultural Reviews 14, 89–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronska, H., Thornton, M. K. & Dwelle, R. B. (1988). Effect of high temperature on tuber initiation and growth. American Potato Journal 65, 479 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Gregory, L. E. (1956). Some factors for tuberization in the potato plant. American Journal of Botany 43, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iritani, W. M. (1968). Factors affecting physiological aging (degeneration) of potato tubers used as seed. American Potato Journal 45, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, C. A., Phatak, S. C., Ghate, S. R. & Gitaitis, R. D. (1988). Cultural practices in use of true seeds of potato and screening of tuber-forming Solanum species under hot climatic conditions. HortScience 23, 500–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, O., Chao, R. & Perrera, J. L. (1986). Estudio preliminar en la profundidad de plantacion de esquejes en papa (Solanum tuberosum). Ciencias Tecnicas Agricolas (Cuba) 5, 39–44.Google Scholar
Midmore, D. J. (1992). Potato production in the tropics. In The Potato Crop: The Scientific Basis for Improvement (Ed. Harris, P. M.), pp. 728–793. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midmore, D. J. & Prange, R. K. (1991). Sources of heat tolerance amongst potato cultivars, breeding lines, and Solanum species. Euphytica 55, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midmore, D. J. & Roca, J. (1992). Influence of production and storage conditions on subsequent growth and tuber yield of potato (Solanum spp.) in the hot tropics. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 119, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorby, J. (1978). The physiology of growth and tuber yield. In The Potato Crop: The Scientific Basis for Improvement (Ed. Harris, P.M.), pp. 189–205. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Perennec, P. & Madec, P. (1980). Age physiologique du plant de pomme de terre. Incidence sur la germination et répercussions sur le comportement des plantes. Potato Research 23, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randeni, G. & Caesar, K. (1984). Die Entwicklung der Kartoffelpflanze (Solanum tuberosum L.) unter dem Einfluss verschiedener Bodentemperaturen II. Die Knollenentwicklung.Z. Acker- und Pflanzenbau 153, 129–135.Google Scholar
Vander, Zaag P. (1987). Developments in potato production techniques in Asia. Acta Horticulture 213, 79–90.Google Scholar
Victorio, R. G., Moreno, U. & Black, C. C Jr, (1986). Growth, partitioning, and harvest index of tuber-bearing Solanum genotypes grown in two contrasting Peruvian environments. Plant Physiology 82, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Went, R. W. (1959). Effects of environment of parent and grandparent generations on tuber production by potatoes. American Journal of Botany 46, 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiersema, S. G. & Booth, R. H. (1985). Influence of growing and storage conditions on the subsequent performance of seed potatoes under short-day conditions. Potato Research 28, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiersema, S. G. & Cabello, R. (1986). Comparative performance of different-sized seed tubers derived from true potato seed. American Potato Journal 63, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiersema, S. G., Cabello, R., Tovar, P. & Dodds, J. H. (1987). Rapid seed multiplication by planting into beds micro tubers and in vitro plants. Potato Research 30, 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1980). The influence of the specific gravity and node of origin of potato tubers on sprout growth. Potato Research 23, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar