Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:58:51.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A physiological analysis of the growth of oilseed rape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
D. G. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
W. J. Ridgman
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge

Summary

For seed crops other than cereals there have been comparatively few comprehensive field studies which have analysed the physiological basis of the effects of genotype and agronomic treatments on growth, development and yield. Milbourn & Hardwick (1968), working on vining peas (Pisum sativum L.), have recently shown that pod growth rate and the yield of seeds are not simple functions of leaf area index and that sourc es of materials other than the leaves are important in affecting the yields of pods and seeds. Furthermore, Flinn & Pato (1970) have shown that the pods themselves can contribute to assimilation in the field pea (Pisum arvense L.). Field experiments carried out at Cambridge in 1968 and 1969 have produced evidence on the relative importance of leaves and other photosynthetic tissues in determining the yields of pods and seeds in another seed crop, namely oilseed rape. The experiment in 1969 is described and discussed below.

Type
Short Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Flinn, A. M. & Pate, J. S. (1970). A quantitative study of carbon transfer from pod and subtending leaf to the ripening seeds of field pea (Pisum arvense L.). J. exp. Bot. 21, 7182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaastra, P. (1963). In Environmental Control of Plant Growth, p. 113. (Ed Evans, L. T..) New York and London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbourn, G. M. & Hardwick, R. C. (1968). The growth of vining peas. I. The effect of time of sowing. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 393402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar