Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:46:28.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance and productivity of Nellore steers on rotationally stocked palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha) pastures in response to herbage allowance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2011

V. R. HERLING ,
C. G. S. PEDREIRA ,
P. H. DE C. LUZ ,
G. J. BRAGA ,
W. A. MARCHESIN ,
F. B. MACEDO  and
C. G. DE LIMA
V. R. HERLING
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil
C. G. S. PEDREIRA*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola Superior de Agricultura ‘Luiz de Queiroz’, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
P. H. DE C. LUZ
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil
G. J. BRAGA
Affiliation:
Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Pólo Regional de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico dos Agronegócios do Centro-Oeste, Unidade de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Brotas, Brotas, São Paulo, Brazil
W. A. MARCHESIN
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil
F. B. MACEDO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil
C. G. DE LIMA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Herbage allowance (HA) impacts performance of grazing cattle as well as sward structure and herbage yield. The objective of the current study was to compare average daily gain (ADG) of Nellore steers on Marandu palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst ex A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Marandu) pastures in response to HA. Treatments were applied as 5, 10, 15 and 20 kg dry matter (DM) per 100 kg live weight (LW) per day HA5, HA10, HA15 and HA20), in rotationally stocked pastures under a 35-day grazing cycle (28 days of rest and 7 days of grazing). The trial was carried out in Pirassununga, Brazil, during two summer seasons in 2003 and 2004, each divided into four grazing cycles. Individual animal (250 kg yearling steers) gain increased with HA up to HA15 (mean=0·69 kg/head per day) during each of four grazing cycles per year. The 2-year gain per area was greater for HA5 and HA10 than for HA15 and HA20 and average stocking rate was 9·6, 6·7, 5·4 and 4·6 head/ha for HA5 to HA20, respectively. In addition to the effects of HA on ADG, changes in sward structure, especially sward height, help to explain variation in daily gain in both years. The HA10 treatment provides higher gain per area without excessively reducing individual animal performance, and thus may be the level of choice for optimizing animal output in pasture-only systems.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 149 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 761 - 768
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adjei, M. B., Mislevy, P. & Ward, C. Y. (1980). Response of tropical grasses to stocking rate. Agronomy Journal 72, 863–868.Google Scholar
Almeida, E. X., Maraschin, G. E., Harthmann, O. E. L., Ribeiro Filho, H. M. N. & Setelich, E. A. (2000). Oferta de forragem de capim-Elefante Anão Mott e a dinâmica da pastagem. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 29, 1281–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, M. A. A. F., Nascimento, D. Jr. & Cecato, U. (2006). Dinâmica da pastagem e desempenho de novilhos em pastagem de capim-tanzânia sob diferentes ofertas de forragem. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 35, 1549–1600.Google Scholar
Boval, M., Cruz, P., Peyraud, J. L. & Penning, P. D. (2000). The effect of herbage allowance on daily intake by Creole heifers tethered on natural Dichanthium spp. pasture. Grass and Forage Science 55, 201–208.Google Scholar
Boval, M., Cruz, P., Ledet, J. E., Coppry, O. & Archimede, H. (2002). Effect of nitrogen on intake and digestibility of a tropical grass grazed by Creole heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 138, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, G. J., Pedreira, C. G. S., Herling, V. R., Luz, P. H. C. & Lima, C. G. (2006). Sward structure and herbage yield of rotationally stocked pastures of ‘Marandu’ palisadegrass [Brachiaria brizantha (A. Rich.) Stapf] as affected by herbage allowance. Scientia Agricola 63, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, G. J., Pedreira, C. G. S., Herling, V. R. & Luz, P. H. C. (2007). Eficiência de pastejo de capim marandu submetido a diferentes ofertas de forragem. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 42, 1641–1649.Google Scholar
Braga, G. J., Pedreira, C. G. S., Herling, V. R., Luz, P. H. C., Marchesin, W. A. & Macedo, F. B. (2009). Quantifying herbage mass on rotationally stocked palisadegrass pastures using indirect methods. Scientia Agricola 66, 127–131.Google Scholar
Corsi, M. & Goulart, R. C. D. (2006). O sistema de produção de carne e as exigências da sociedade moderna. In 23° Simpósio Sobre Manejo da Pastagem (Eds Pedreira, C. G. S., Moura, J. C., da Silva, S. C. & de Faria, V. P.), pp. 1–7. Sao Paulo, Brazil: FEALQ.Google Scholar
Da Silva, S. C., Bueno, A. A. O., Carnevalli, R. A., Uebele, M. C., Bueno, F. O., Hodgson, J., Matthew, C., Arnold, G. C. & Morais, J. P. G. (2009). Sward structural characteristics and herbage accumulation of Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça subjected to rotational stocking managements. Scientia Agricola 66, 8–19.Google Scholar
de Moraes, A. & Maraschin, G. E. (1988). Pressões de pastejo e produção animal em milheto cv. comum. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 23, 197–205.Google Scholar
Gontijo Neto, M. M., Batista Euclides, V. P., do Nascimento Junior, D., Miranda, L. F., Miranda da Fonseca, D. & Paschoal de Oliveira, M. (2006). Effects of herbage allowance on the intake and grazing time of Nellore steers grazing tanzaniagrass pasture. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 35, 60–66.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Garay, A., Sollenberger, L. E., Staples, C. R. & Pedreira, C. G. S. (2004). ‘Florigraze’ and ‘Arbrook’ rhizome peanut as pasture for growing Holstein heifers. Crop Science 44, 1355–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. (1990). Grazing Management – Science into Practice. Essex, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical.Google Scholar
Kim, T. H., An, K. W. & Jung, W. J. (2001). Effects of daily herbage allowance on the organic reserves at the end of grazing and the accumulation of herbage during regrowth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 883–890.Google Scholar
Macedo, M. C. M. (2004). Análise comparativa de recomendações de adubação em pastagens. In 20° Simpósio sobre manejo da pastagem (Eds Peixoto, A. M., Moura, J. C., da Silva, S. C. & de Faria, V. P.), pp. 317–356. Sao Paulo, Brazil: FEALQ.Google Scholar
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. & McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Hydrology Earth System Sciences 11, 1633–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezende, C. P., Pereira, J. M., Pinto, J. C., Borges, A. M. F., Muniz, J. A., Andrade, I. F. & Evangelista, A. R. (2008). Estrutura do pasto disponível e do resíduo pós-pastejo em pastagens de capim-cameroon e capim-marandu. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 1742–1749.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 7.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Sollenberger, L. E., Moore, J. E., Allen, V. G. & Pedreira, C. G. S. (2005). Reporting forage allowance in grazing experiments. Crop Science 45, 896–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar