Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:48:32.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pasture intake and grazing behaviour of growing European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus, Landrace×Large White) in a semi-extensive production system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2017

S. M. HODGKINSON ,
C. POLANCO ,
L. ACEITON  and
I. F. LOPEZ
S. M. HODGKINSON*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile
C. POLANCO
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile Graduate School, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile
L. ACEITON
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile
I. F. LOPEZ
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The objective of the present study was to determine the pasture intake of European wild boar and domestic pigs throughout their growth period (from 60 to 207 days of age). The proportion of time that each animal type spent grazing was also determined. Twelve 60-day-old pure-bred European wild boar (six castrated males and six females, average live-weight (±s.e.m.) 6·8 ± 0·37 kg) and 12 70-day-old domestic pigs (Large White × Landrace, six castrated males and six females, average live-weight [ ± s.e.m.] 24·1 ± 0·66 kg) were used in the study. Each day during the study, the animals grazed from 08·00 until 16·00 h, after which they had ad-libitum access to a supplemental diet for 1 h. Every 14 days throughout the study (a total of ten determinations), the pasture consumption was determined as the difference between the pasture dry matter (DM) availability pre- and post-grazing. The supplemental diet consumption was also determined. Three times during the study (age of animals 85, 140 and 198 days), the behaviour of each animal was observed over four consecutive days while grazing. When considered on a metabolic bodyweight basis, the pasture consumption of the European wild boar was greater than that in the domestic pigs. Approximately 0·20 of the total DM intake by the wild boar was pasture, whereas only 0·10 of the total DM intake by the domestic pigs was pasture. However, domestic pigs consumed a greater quantity of supplemental diet than the wild boar. The wild boar obtained 0·20 of their total daily dietary apparent energy intake from pasture, compared with 0·07 in the domestic pigs. Wild boar were more active during 8-h grazing periods spending 0·54 of their time grazing or moving around, compared with 0·32 of the time in domestic pigs.

Type
Animal Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 10 , December 2017 , pp. 1659 - 1668
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: Massey Institute of Food Science and Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

References

REFERENCES

Alvarez, A., Hodgkinson, S. M. & Flores, P. (2014). Description of productive management of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in a semi-extensive system in the south of Chile. AgroSur 42, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andresen, N. & Redbo, I. (1999). Foraging behaviour of growing pigs on grassland in relation to stocking rate and feed crude protein level. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62, 183–197.Google Scholar
AOAC International (1995). Official Methods of Analysis, Vol. 1, 16th edn. Washington, DC, USA: AOAC.Google Scholar
Bateman, J. V. (1970). Nutrición Animal, Manual de Métodos Analíticos. México DF, México: Agencia para el Desarrollo Internacional.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (1961). Research Techniques in Use at the Grassland Research Institute, Hurley. Hurley, Berkshire, England: Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. A. (2003). Intake of nutrients from pasture by pigs. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 62, 257–265.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. A., Anssems, E., Horrell, R. L., A'Ness, P. & Eddison, J. (1996). The effect of nose-ringing of outdoor sows on foraging behavior and pasture damage (abstract). Animal Science 62, 674.Google Scholar
Gustafson, G. M. & Stern, S. (2003). Two strategies for meeting energy demands of growing pigs at pasture. Livestock Production Science 80, 167–174.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, S. M., Schmidt, M. & Ulloa, N. (2008). Comparison of the digestible energy content of maize, oats and alfalfa between the European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) and Landrace × Large White pig (Sus scrofa domesticus). Animal Feed Science and Technology 144, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, S. M., Lopez, I. F. & Navarrete, S. (2009). Ingestion of energy, protein and amino acids from pasture by grazing European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in a semi-extensive production system. Livestock Science 122, 222–226.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, S. M., Matus, F. & Lopez, I. F. (2013). Behavior of grazing European wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a semi-extensive production system. Ciencia E Investigación Agraria 40, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrell, R. I., A'Ness, P. J., Edwards, S. A. & Eddison, J. C. (2001). The use of nose-rings in pigs: consequences for rooting, other functional activities, and welfare. Animal Welfare 10, 3–22.Google Scholar
Kephart, K. B., Hollis, G. R. & Danielson, D. M. (1998). Forages for swine. In Pork Industry Handbook, Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-2284, pp. 1–12. Michigan, USA: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Lindberg, J. E. & Andersson, C. (1998). The nutritive value of barley-based diets with forage meal inclusion for growing pigs based on total tract digestibility and nitrogen utilization. Livestock Production Science 56, 43–52.Google Scholar
Mowat, D., Watson, C. A., Mayes, R. W., Kelly, H., Browning, H. & Edwards, S. A. (2001). Herbage intake of growing pigs in an outdoor organic production system. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 2001, 169.Google Scholar
Quijada, R. P., Bitsch, N. I. & Hodgkinson, S. M. (2012). Digestible energy content of pasture species in growing European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.). Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 96, 421–427.Google Scholar
Rivero, J., Hodgkinson, S. M. & López-Villalobos, N. (2013 a). Definition of the breeding goal and determination of breeding objectives for European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in a semi-extensive production system. Livestock Science 157, 38–47.Google Scholar
Rivero, J., López, I. & Hodgkinson, S. (2013 b). Pasture consumption and grazing behaviour of European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) under continuous and rotational grazing systems. Livestock Science 154, 175–183.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. J., López, I. F. & Hodgkinson, S. M. (2013 c). Pasture dry matter consumption in European wild boars (Sus scrofa L.) as affected by herbage allowance. Journal of Animal Science 91, 1758–1764.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2006). Base SAS 9·3·1 Procedures Guide Vols 1, 2, 3 and 4. Cary, NC, USA: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Skewes, O. & Morales, R. (2006). Wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) breeding in Chile. Basic aspects of distribution, size and management. Agro-Ciencia 22, 29–36.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H. & Dickey, D. A. (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.Google Scholar
Studnitz, M., Jensen, K. H. & Jorgensen, E. (2003). The effect of nose rings on the exploratory behaviour of outdoor gilts exposed to different tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
van Wieren, S. E. (2000). Digestibility and voluntary intake of roughages by wild boar and Meishan pigs. Animal Science 71, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, E., Danielsen, V. & Larsen, A. (1995). Utilisation of dried grass meal by young growing pigs and sows. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production p. Paper N2b. Prague, Czech Republic: Wageningen Pers.Google Scholar
Weiler, U., Claus, R., Schnoebelen-Combes, S. & Louveau, I. (1998). Influence of age and genotype on endocrine parameters and growth performance: a comparative study in Wild boars, Meishan and Large White boars. Livestock Production Science 54, 21–31.Google Scholar