Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:50:40.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the haemoglobin level of cows and sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. M. Allcroft
W. M. Allcroft
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The haemoglobin values for the blood of clinically normal cows and ewes over England and Wales are very similar, with a mean value around 11·5 g. per 100 ml. Although the extreme range is wide, about 8–17 g., the distribution of values is such that the common normal range may be taken as 9·5–13·5 g. per 100 ml. There is no striking difference in age groups.

Metabolic disorders such as ‘milk fever’ and ‘grass tetany’ in cows and ‘pregnancy toxaemia’ in ewes have no specific effect on haemoglobin level. Chronic hypoglycaemic ketosis of the dairy cow leads to progressive anaemia in which levels down to 6 g. per 100 ml. were found. Border or Northumbrian ‘pining’ of sheep is accompanied by an even more pronounced progressive anaemia, values as low as 3·2 g. per 100 ml. being encountered.

It is a pleasure to acknowledge the technical assistance of Mr F. J. Salt and the direction and interest of Dr H. H. Green in the main programme from which the protocols were drawn.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , July 1941 , pp. 320 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, , Gayley, & Pratt, (1930). J. Dairy Sci. 13, 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennetts, & Chapman, (1937). Aust. vet. J., 13, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, & Hughes, (1932). J. Nutrit, 5, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filmer, (1933). Aust. vet. J. 9, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourie, (1931). 11th Rep. Riv. Vet. Services and Animal Indust. S. Africa, 495.Google Scholar
Hamersma, (1934). Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 2, 153.Google Scholar
Manresa, , Reyes, , Gomez, , Zialcita, & Falcon, (1940). Empire J. exp. Agric. 8, 97.Google Scholar
Marston, & Macdonald, (1938). Bull. Conn. sci. industr. Res. Aust. no. 113.Google Scholar
McCay, (1931). J. Dairy Sci. 14, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, (1932–1933). Rep. N.Y. St. vet. Coll. p. 71.Google Scholar
Neal, & Becker, (1933). J. agric. Res. 46, 557.Google Scholar
Report C.S.I.R. Commonwealth of Australia (1933), p. 43.Google Scholar
Taylor, (1938). Empire J. exp. Agric. 6, 377.Google Scholar
Underwood, , Harvey, & Beck, (1939). Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 17, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar