Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:49:08.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nutritive value of the forage pea Pisutn arvense cv. ‘Rosakrone’ for laying hens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Davidson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
Morag McFadyen
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
E. Milne
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB

Summary

The nutritive value of a new forage pea (Pisum arvense), commercially available as ‘Rosakrone’, was assessed by feeding the seeds in ground form to laying hens as a supplementary source of protein in diets based on mixed cereals. Like other pulse seeds they were found to be relatively deficient in methionine. The effect of this on egg production was overcome by adding synthetic methionine to the diet.

However, there was also present an anti-nutritive factor, similar in action to that found in other pulse seeds, which caused live-weight loss and reduced the rate of lay to about 0·85 of normal in 20 weeks with 40% pea meal in the diet. This anti-nutritive factor appeared to be heat stable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1975). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 1. Poultry, 2nd ed.London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Combs, G. F. (1960). Protein and energy requirements of laying hens. In Proceedings of University of Maryland 1960. Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, pp. 2844.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1973). The nutritive value of field beans (Viciafaba L.) for laying hens. British Poultry Science 14, 557567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. (1980 a). The nutritive value of field peas (Pisum sativum) in an oat-based diet for laying hens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 10551058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. (1980 b). Attempts to eliminate from field beans the anti-nutritive factor which reduces egg production. British Poultry Science 21, 299307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dun, P. & Beer, A. E. (1974). Utilization of home grown beans. 1. Laying fowls. Experimental Husbandry 26, 17.Google Scholar
Guillaume, J. & Bellec, R. (1977). Use of field beans (Vicia faba L.) in diets for laying hens. British Poultry Science 18, 573583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honavar, P. M., Shih, C. V. & Liener, I. E. (1962). Inhibition of the growth of rats by purified haemagglutinin fractions isolated from Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Nutrition 77, 109114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffé, W. G. (1949). Limiting essential amino acids of some legume seeds. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 71, 398399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, S. (1963). On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. Journal of Biological Chemistry 238, 235237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S., Spaceman, D. H. & Stein, W. H. (1958). Chromatography of amino acids on sulphonated polystyrene resins. Analytical Chemistry 30, 11851190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pusztai, A. & Watt, W. B. (1970). Glycoprotein. II. The isolation and characterisation of a major antigenio and non-haemagglutinating glycoprotein from Phaseolus vulgaris. Biochimica et Biophysica Ada 207, 413431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. J. & Teague, P. W. (1974). Performance of two strains of laying fowl fed on diets containing field beans (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 231235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar