Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:24:37.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the use of the analysis of covariance to reduce standard errors in experiments on milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. H. Broster  and
R. N. Curnow
W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
R. N. Curnow
Affiliation:
Unit of Biometry, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The use of changeover designs and of covariance analysis in experiments on lactating cows is reviewed. Continuous treatment designs are criticized because of their large coefficients ofvariation, e.g. of the order of 20 % for milk yield. Although changeover designs have smaller errors they are criticized because the results have strictly limited practical application. Covariance analysis applied to the data from continuous treatment designs offers a means of increasing their precision. Measurements made in a preliminary period may be used to adjust experimental measurements made subsequently for animal to animal variation. The covariance method was tested on data from thirtytwo heifers in an experiment involving factorial sequences of treatments. Weeks 5-12 of lactation formed the control period and weeks 13-22 the experimental period.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , August 1964 , pp. 91 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. L., Broster, W. H. & Burt, A. W. A. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Broster, W. H. (1961). Ann. Rep. Nat. Inst. Res. Dairying, p. 42.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C., Taylor, J. & Thomson, I. (1961). J. Dairy Res. 28, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, S., Jacobson, N. L., McGilliabd, L. D., Homeyer, P. G. & Heady, E. O. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. (1958). N.A.A.S. Quart. Rev. no. 58, p. 1.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. (1962). Agriculture, 69, 261.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Balch, C. C., Bartlett, S. & Campling, R. C. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Ridler, B. & Foot, A. S. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1957 a). J. Dairy Res. 24, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1957 b). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 19, col. 435.Google Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Holmes, W. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. & Watson, J. N. (1961). J. Dairy Res. 28, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G., Autrey, K. M. & Cannon, C. Y. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Cox, C. P. (1958). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, 20, 193.Google Scholar
Cox, C. P. (1962). Biometrics, 18, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curnow, R. N. & Sharpe, E. (1962). Biometrics, 18, 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flux, D. S. & Patchell, M. R. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerbing, J. C. & Young, P. W. (1961). N.Z.J. Agric. 103, 2.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Reid, D., MacLusky, D. S., Waite, R. & Watson, J. N. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, J. B. (1957). J. Endocrin. 16, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, R. Jnr & Walker-Love, J. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 59, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, H. L. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E. & Neville, W. E. Jnr (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, J. C. (1963). Biometrics, 19, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, H. D. & Lucas, H. L. (1962). Tech. Bull. N. Carolina Agric. Expt. Sta. no. 147.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Teichman, R., Eaton, H. D., Beall, G., Johnson, R. E., Lucas, H. L. Jnr & Moore, L. A. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar