The last issue of this Journal (p. 132) contains a paper by Dr R. A. Fisher on the effect of Silica upon the growth of Barley at Rothamsted, which begins by stating that his data “show conclusively that the view previously rejected that the silicate acts by making available to the plant the actual reserves of soil phosphates must be regarded as strongly established.” Twice elsewhere Dr Fisher states that this erroneous conclusion of previous investigators is due to the fact that they had considered only the proportion of phosphoric acid in the ash and had overlooked the increase in the total phosphoric acid in the crop. As Mr Morison and I were the previous investigators in question I turned to our twenty-three-year-old paper with some curiosity to ascertain the grounds for this magisterial dismissal of our conclusions, for my remembrance of the subject did not tally with the opinion Dr Fisher attributes to us. Still less do I agree now that I have re-examined our original paper.