Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:30:22.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mineralogical composition of some Scottish soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

James Hendrick  and
George Newlands
James Hendrick
Affiliation:
(Soil Research Department, North of Scotland College of Agriculture, Aberdeen.)
George Newlands
Affiliation:
(Soil Research Department, North of Scotland College of Agriculture, Aberdeen.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Previous investigations showed that certain Scottish soils were of glacial drift origin, that they were comparatively rich in unweathered silicates and therefore in reserves of plant-food, that they showed considerable variation in such silicates and were capable of classification accordingly. Some indication was also shown that the glacial drift, and hence the resulting soil, was sometimes of local origin, its character being determined by the underlying rock. In the present investigation a more extensive survey of Scottish soils has been made in order to discover to what extent these preliminary findings might be applicable generally.

2. For this purpose soils have been collected from various localities in the north, north-east, west and south of Scotland, and have been analysed mechanically and the “fine sand” fraction examined mineralogically.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 1925 , pp. 257 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)East, Lothian, Memoir of the Geol. Survey, Scotland, No. 33, p. 171.Google Scholar
(2)Gardiner, R. F. “Solubility of the lime, magnesia and potash in such minerals as epidote, chrysolite and muscovite.” Journ. Agric. Res. 16, No. 10.Google Scholar
(3)Glinka, K. (1914). Die Typen der Bodenbildung. Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
(4)Glinka, K. (1914). “Different types of soil formation and the classification of the resulting soils.” Internat. Rev. of Science and Practice of Agr. New Series, 2, No. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
(5)Goldschmit, V. M. and Johnson, E. (1923). “The significance of mica minerals as a source of potassium for plants.” Norges Geol. Underøk. No. 108, p. 89 (Chem. Abs. 17, No. 5, p. 846).Google Scholar
(6)Haley, D. E. (1923). “Availability of potassium in orthoclase for plant nutrition.” Soil Science, 15, No. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Hendrick, J. and Newlands, G. “The value of mineralogical examination in determining soil types.” Journ. Agric. Science, 13, Part I.Google Scholar
(8)Hendrick, J. and Newlands, G. “The value of mineralogical examination in determining soil types.” Journ. Agric. Science, 13, p. 9.Google Scholar
(9)Hendrick, J. and Newlands, G. “The value of mineralogical examination in determining soil types.” Journ. Agric. Science, 13, p. 4.Google Scholar
(10)Mackie, W. “The principles that regulate the distribution of particles of heavy minerals in sedimentary rocks.” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc. 11, 153.Google Scholar
(11)Plummer, J. K. “Petrography of some North Caroline Soils.” Journ. Agric. Res. 5, 577.Google Scholar
(12)Plummer, J. K. “Availability of potash in some common soil-forming minerals.” Journ. Agric. Res. 14, No. 8, p. 297.Google Scholar
(13)Plummer, J. K. “Availability of potash in some common soil-forming minerals.” Journ. Agric. Res. 5, 580.Google Scholar
(14)Read, H. H.Memoirs of Geol. Survey, Scotland, Nos. 86 and 96, p. 219.Google Scholar
(15)Read, H. H.Memoirs of Geol. Survey, Scotland, Nos. 86 and 96, p. 218.Google Scholar