Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:14:29.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineralization and field effectiveness of ordinary and coated urea, urea-aldehyde condensation product and urea treated with nitrification inhibitor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. P. P. Nair
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India
P. B. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India

Summary

A laboratory incubation study followed by a field experiment was made in a silty clay loam soil (pH 6·9) at Pantnagar, India, on the effectiveness of ordinary urea, coated urea (sulphur and shellac-coated), urea-isobutyraldehyde condensation product (isobutylidenediurea, IBDU) and urea blended with nitrification inhibitor AM (2- amino-4 chloro-6-methylpyrimidine) and neem (a non-edible oil seed obtained from Azadirachta indica) cake. Whereas untreated urea and IBDU hydrolysed rapidly leaving no trace of urea-N after 2 weeks, sulphur-coated urea mineralized quite slowly and retained urea-N for as long as 4 weeks after incubation. Urea blended with neem cake was intermediate. Of all the materials tested, sulphur-coated urea showed maximum nitrification inhibition. A combination of one third sulphur-coated urea at planting + two thirds ordinary urea 30 days later yielded 12·3% more maize grain than ordinary urea in the same proportion at the same times of application.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, L. E. & Moodie, C. D. (1965). Carbonate. In Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2 (ed. Black, C. A.), pp. 13791396. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: American Society of Agronomy Inc.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1965). Inorganic forms of nitrogen. In Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2 (ed. Black, C. A.), pp. 11791237. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: American Society of Agronomy Inc.Google Scholar
Bundy, L. G. & Bremner, J. M. (1974). Effects of urease inhibitors on nitrification in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 6, 2730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coohran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1950). Experimental Designs. New York, U.S.A.: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Douglas, L. A. & Bremner, J. M. (1970). Extraction and colorimetrio determinations of urea in soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34, 859861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauck, R. D. (1972). Nitrification inhibitors – Present status and future use. Tennessee Valley Authority, National Fertilizers Development Center, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, U.S.A. (cf. Agronomy Abstract 1972, p. 150).Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. India: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kilmer, V. J. & Alexander, L. T. (1949). Methods of making mechanical analyses of soils. Soil Science 68, 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunt, O. R. (1968). Modified sulphur-coated urea for controlled nutrient release. Transactions of the IX International Congress of Soil Science 3, 337383.Google Scholar
Nair, K. P. P. & Sharma, V. P. (1976). Utility studies on controlled release nitrogenous fertilizers and nitrification retarders in maize. Proceedings of the IV International Colloquium on the Control of Plant Nutrition. Ghent, Belgium 2, 531541.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. R. & Dean, L. A. (1965). Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2 (ed. Black, C. A.), pp. 10351049. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: American Society of Agronomy Inc.Google Scholar
Prasad, R., Rajale, G. B. & Lakhdive, B. A. (1971). Nitrification inhibitors and slow release nitrogen fertilizers. Advances in Agronomy 23, 337383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar