Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:56:29.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineral nitrogen in tropical forest soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. K. Cunningham
R. K. Cunningham
Affiliation:
West African Cocoa Research Institute, Ghana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Δmin-Nad is the most satisfactory measurement for assessing mineralizable-N in the tropical forest soils used; values are treble those for Δmin-Nf and then increase even further on storage. Comparisons of Δmin-Nad are pointless unless methods of sampling, drying, storing and incubating are standardized.

2. Δmin-Nad is correlated with total N and organic C but not pH.

3. Undisturbed tropical forest soils can produce very large quantities of mineral N, particularly in their surface layers. This probably accounts for the lack of N responses in these soils. More intensive cultivation of these soils is only possible when organic matter is preserved by protecting cleared soils.

4. Added nitrogen was leached more rapidly in these soils than in comparable temperate soils but was not fast enough to prevent absorption by plants.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , October 1962 , pp. 257 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brammer, H. (1958). Soils of Ghana. Accra, Ghana Dept. of Agric.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. & Shaw, K. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, G. W. & Cunningham, R. K. (1958). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 9, 324.Google Scholar
Cornfield, A. H. (1952). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 3, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, R. K. & Cooke, G. W. (1958). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 9, 317.Google Scholar
Cunningham, R. K. & Smith, R. W. (1961). Trop. Agric. 38, 13.Google Scholar
Cunningham, B. K. & Arnold, P. W. (1962). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 13, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1959). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 10, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1961 a). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 562.Google Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1961 b). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, P. H. & Greenland, D. J. (1960). Commonw. Bur. Soil Tech. Comm. 51.Google Scholar
Saunder, D. H., Ellis, B. S. & Hall, A. (1957). J. Soil Sci. 8, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. (1934). Soil Sci. 37, 29.Google Scholar