Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:00:16.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methods of experimentation in animal nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. J. Sheehy
Affiliation:
(Department of Animal Nutrition, University College, Dublin.)

Extract

In a recent article on the above subject by Dunlop (1) reference was made to a method suggested by Sheehy and Senior (2) for the purpose of “making an adjustment in tlie weight cuive, where, through accident or other cause not arising out of feeding, the weight of a particular animal on an exceptional occasion deviated widely from the general trend of its live weight record. A slight injury, for instance, would on occasion cause an animal either to lose weight or merely to maintain its previous weight for a week, thus placing the group to which it belonged at a disadvantage during that week” (2). Since Dunlop asserts that the method suggested “is based on a fallacy” by which is implied that it is inaccurate, the necessity arises, so as to prevent the formation of a wrong impression, to show that Dunlop's reasoning in this connection is based on incorrect impressions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1), DunlopMethods of experimentation in animal nutrition. J. Agric. Sci. (1933), 23, 580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2), Sheehy and Senior. Mineral metabolism of the pig and the addition of inorganic mineral supplements to the pig's diet. J. Dep. of Agric. Irish Free State, (1930), 30, No. 1.Google Scholar