Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T13:27:54.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal influence on sheep production: a study of some birth traits of lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. A. Guirgis
R. A. Guirgis
Affiliation:
Wool Section, Department of Animal Production, Desert Institute, Matareya, Cairo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study was made of the birthcoat and the birth weight of Merino lambs, coarsewoolled Ossimi and the reciprocal crosses. The pre-natal maternal environment had a clear effect on the fineness of the birthcoat of cross-bred lambs born to Merino ewes (Ossimi × Merino) where 22·6% had fine arrays, whereas those out of coarse wool Ossimi dams (Merino × Ossimi) were all coarse like pure Ossimi lambs.

Merino birthcoats were the most highly evolved, having the highest curly tip/precurly tip ratio, whereas the Ossimi were the least evolved. Ossimi × Merino lambs had more evolved birthcoats than Merino × Ossimi. CT/Pre-CT ratios were 1·00, 2·35, 4·41 and 8·06 in Ossimi, Merino × Ossimi, Ossimi × Merino and Merino lambs, respectively.

Ossimi birthcoats had almost straight fibres. Merino × Ossimi showed a low incidence of crimp post natally, Ossimi × Merino exhibited more post-natal crimp and that in Merino predominant crimp occurred throughout.

Strong (coarse) fibres were more frequent in Merino × Ossimi whereas Ossimi × Merino possessed higher frequencies of the less strong fibres and CT/Pre-CT ratio than the other cross. The difference between the two means of the crosses was highly significant in all fibre types.

Lambs with strong fibre type arrays were heavier at birth than those with finer ones.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 535 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burns, M. (1955). Observations on Merino × Herdwiok hybrid sheep with special reference to the fleece. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 46, 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, M. (1966). Merino birthcoat fibre types and their follicular origin. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, M. (1967). The Katsina wool project. I. The coat and skin histology of some Northern Nigerian hair sheep and their Merino crosses. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 44, 173–92.Google Scholar
Burns, M. (1972). Effect of ova transfer on the birthcoat of lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, M. & Ryder, M. L. (1974). Effect of egg transfer on the skin follicles and birthcoats of Finnish Landrace and Soay lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1933). Hairy fibres of the Ronmey sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 46, 10–22.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1934). Fibre type arrays and hairiness. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 48, 37–48.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1965). Lamb fibre types. In Biology of Skin and Hair Growth (ed. Lyne, A. G. & Short, B. F.), pp. 89–104. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Galal, E.Salah, E., Aboul-Naga, A., Eltawil, E. A. & Khishin, E. S. (1972). Estimates of combining abilities and maternal influence in crosses between Merino, Ossimi and Barki sheep. Animal Production 15, 47–52.Google Scholar
Goot, H. (1941). Evolution of the fleece of the sheep. Nature, London 148, 596–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guirgis, R. A. (1967 a). The inheritance of birthcoat characters in Barki, Merino and their crosses. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 32, 305–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guirgis, R. A. (1967 b). Fibre type arrays and Kemp succession in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. L. (1956). The maternal influence on size in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 48, 36–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, O. W. (1972). The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. V. Maternal effects in Swine. Journal of Animal Science 35, 1303–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. & Wilson, D. T. (1972). Fleece characteristics and postnatal fleece development in Finnish Landrace × Merino sheep. Animal Production 15, 75–84.Google Scholar
Stephenson, S. K. (1956). Some aspects of gene dosage in N-type sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 447–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. P. (1972). The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. II. Mitochondria and animal inheritance. Journal of Animal Science 35, 1280–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiener, G. & Slee, J. (1965). Maternal and genetic influences on follicle and fleece development in Lincoln and Welsh Mountain sheep – A study involving egg transfer. Animal Production 7, 333–45.Google Scholar