Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:18:55.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Loss of nitrogen and carbon during storage of the fibrous fraction of separated pig slurry and influence on nitrogen availability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2008

J. PETERSEN  and
P. SØRENSEN
J. PETERSEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
P. SØRENSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Manure production in the most livestock-intensive areas exceeds the crop demand for nutrients and legislative restrictions on application rate cause a shortage of land for manure application. Export of nutrients in the fibrous fraction of separated animal slurry has become an option for sustaining or increasing livestock production in livestock-intensive areas. The nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) losses during on-farm storage of the fibrous fraction, originating from separation of anaerobically digested pig slurry using the non-volatile elements phosphorus (P), copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) as internal references, were calculated. In addition, the plant availability of N in fresh and stored fibrous fractions was evaluated in an incubation experiment. The losses of N and C were greater from the heap surface than from the centre, and turning the heap by reloading for transport increased the losses. The proportion of ammonium N, total N and C lost during storage of the fibrous fraction was 0·30–0·90, 0·10–0·55 and 0·35–0·70 of the initial amount, respectively. Storage reduced the plant-available N and the amount of residual organic N, thereby having long-term influence on soil fertility. The plant-available N in fresh fibrous fractions was 0·22–0·52 of total N, but decreased to 0·15–0·38 after storage due to a decrease of the Nammonium:Ntotal ratio during storage. The net mineralization of manure N was negatively related to the Ctotal:Norganic ratio. The fibrous fraction of separated pig slurry may be characterized as a manure with a high potential for loss and a variable value as fertilizer.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 146 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 403 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balsari, P., Santoro, E., Dinuccio, E. & Gioelli, F. (2006). Assessment of the performances of different mechanical solid–liquid separators for pig and cattle slurries. In Proceedings of the 12th Ramiran International Conference. Technology for Recycling of Manure and Organic Residues in a Whole-farm Perspective, Vol. II (Ed. Petersen, S. O.), pp. 157–159. DIAS Report Plant Production No. 123. Tjele, Denmark: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Birkmose, T., Sørensen, P. & Rubæk, G. H. (2006). Utilization and losses of nitrogen and phosphorus from field-applied slurry separation products. In Proceedings of the 12th Ramiran International Conference. Technology for Recycling of Manure and Organic Residues in a Whole-farm Perspective, Vol. I (Ed. Petersen, S. O.), pp. 163–166. DIAS Report Plant Production No. 122. Tjele, Denmark: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Chadwick, D. R. (2005). Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering. Atmospheric Environment 39, 787–799.Google Scholar
Chadwick, D. R., John, F., Pain, B. P., Chambers, B. J. & Williams, J. (2000). Plant uptake of nitrogen from the organic nitrogen fraction of animal manures: a laboratory experiment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 134, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EU (1991). Council Directive No. 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources. Official Journal of the European Communities L375, 1.Google Scholar
European Commission (2007). Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC Concerning the Protection of Waters Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources for the Period 2000–2003. COM(2007)120final with enclosure SEC(2007)339. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Gioelli, F., Balsari, P., Dinuccio, E. & Santoro, E. (2006). Ammonia emission from the management of solid fraction derived form the mechanical separation of slurry. In Proceedings of the 12th Ramiran International Conference. Technology for Recycling of Manure and Organic Residues in a Whole-farm Perspective, Vol. II (Ed. Petersen, S. O.), pp. 133–135. DIAS Report Plant Production No. 123. Tjele, Denmark: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. N., Henriksen, K. & Sommer, S. G. (2006). Observations of production and emission of greenhouse gases and ammonia during storage of solids separated from pig slurry: effects of covering. Atmospheric Environment 40, 4172–4181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchmann, H. (1985). Losses, plant uptake and utilisation of manure nitrogen during a production cycle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Supplement 24, 78 pp.Google Scholar
Kirchmann, H. & Lundvall, A. (1993). Relationship between N immobilization and volatile fatty acids in soil after application of pig and cattle slurry. Biology and Fertility of Soils 15, 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, J. N., Amato, M., Grace, P. R. & Van Veen, J. A. (1995). Simulation of 14C turnover through the microbial biomass in soils incubated with 14C-labelled plant residues. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27, 777–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larney, F. J., Buckley, K. E., Hao, X. & McCaughey, W. P. (2006). Fresh, stockpiled, and composted beef cattle feedlot manure: nutrient levels and mass balance estimates in Alberta and Manitoba. Journal of Environmental Quality 35, 1844–1854.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, S., Iversen, T. M., Kjær, S. & Feenstra, P. (2005). The regulation of nutrient losses in Denmark to control aquatic pollution from agriculture. In Evaluating Agri-environmental Policies: Design, Practice and Results (Ed. Jones, D.), pp. 295–208. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
Møller, H. B., Maahn, M. & Skaaning, K. (2002 a). Separation af Afgasset Gylle med Dekantercentrifuge. Danmarks JordbrugsForskning, Intern Rapport nr. 152. Tjele, Denmark: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences. (In Danish only.)Google Scholar
Møller, H. B., Sommer, S. G. & Ahring, B. K. (2002 b). Separation efficiency and particle size distribution in relation to manure type and storage conditions. Bioresource Technology 85, 189–196.Google Scholar
Osada, T., Sommer, S. G., Dahl, P. & Rom, H. B. (2001). Gaseous emission and changes in nutrient composition during deep litter composting. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil and Plant Science 51, 137–142.Google Scholar
Petersen, S. O., Lind, A. M. & Sommer, S. G. (1998). Nitrogen and organic matter losses during storage of cattle and pig manure. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 130, 69–79.Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G. (2001). Effect of composting on nutrient loss and nitrogen availability of cattle deep litter. European Journal of Agronomy 14, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Dahl, P. (1999). Nutrient and carbon balance during the composting of deep litter. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 74, 145–153.Google Scholar
Sørensen, P. (2003). Udnyttelse og tab af kvælstof efter separering af gylle. Grøn Viden, Markbrug 283. (In Danish only.)Google Scholar
Sørensen, P. & Amato, M. (2002). Remineralization and residual effects of N after application of pig slurry to soil. European Journal of Agronomy 16, 81–95.Google Scholar
Sørensen, P. & Thomsen, I. K. (2005) Separation of pig slurry and plant utilization and loss of nitrogen-15-labeled slurry nitrogen. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69, 1644–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, I. K. (2005). Nitrate leaching under spring barley is influenced by the presence of a ryegrass catch crop: results from a lysimeter experiment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 111, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, I. K. & Olesen, J. E. (2000). C and N mineralization of composted and anaerobically stored ruminant manure in differently textured soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 135, 151–159.Google Scholar
Wolter, M., Prayitno, S. & Schuchardt, F. (2004). Greenhouse gas emission during storage of pig manure on a pilot scale. Bioresource Technology 95, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed