Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:39:27.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-term effects of improvement methods on Molinia caerulea dominant rough grazing on wet hill land. 2. Mineral composition of herbage and soil physical, chemical and biological characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. A. Davies
D. A. Davies
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, Wales, S723 3EB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of controlled grazing, application of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg and the introduction of grasses and white clover, with and without cultivations, on Molinia caerulea dominant rough hill grazing were studied over 19 years in mid-Wales. Nutrient concentration in, and uptake by, the herbage and changes in soil physical, chemical and biological characteristics were monitored periodically. Concentrations and uptake of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na were highest on the reseeded pastures. Nutrient balance sheets showed that the nutrients applied were most efficiently utilized on reseeded swards. They also highlighted the considerable losses of applied Ca and Mg that occurred.

Implications of the results are discussed in relation to both future agricultural use of such areas in the hills and the effects on the environment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 243 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, 351 pp. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Allen, J. W. (1987). Sheep production and the environment. In Efficient Sheep Production from Grass (ed. Pollott, G. E.), British Grassland Society Occasional Symposium No. 21 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1975). Fertilizing for Maximum Yield 297 pp. London: Crosby Lockwood Staples.Google Scholar
Cuttle, S. P. & James, A. R. (1986). Nutrient leaching studies and fertiliser response trials. Annual Report of the Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1985, pp. 41–42.Google Scholar
Davies, D. A. (1975). Productivity of S.59 red fescue with and without S.184 white clover under hill conditions. 2. Herbage measurements in relation to animal performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. A. (1987). Long-term effects of improvement methods on Molinia caerulea dominant rough grazing on wet hill land. 1. Pasture production, quality and botanical composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. A. & Munro, J. M M. (1974). Potential pasture production in the uplands of Wales. 4. Nitrogen response from sown and natural pastures. Journal of the British Grassland Society 29, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H. (1969). Influence of soil and management on the botanical composition and productivity of 20 year-old reclaimed hill pastures in mid-Wales. In Hill Land Productivity (ed. Hunt, I. V.), pp. 162–167. British Grassland Society Occasional Symposium No. 4.Google Scholar
Davies, R. O. (1941). The effect of manuring, grazing and cutting on the yield, botanical and chemical composition of natural hill swards. II. Chemical section. Journal of Ecology 29, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. O., Jones, D. I. H. & Milton, W. E. J. (1959). Factors influencing the composition and nutritive value of herbage from fescue and Molinia areas. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 53, 268–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. O. & Milton, W. E. J. (1947). The yield, botanical and chemical composition of natural hill herbage under manuring, controlled grazing and hay conditions. II. Chemical section. Journal of Ecology 35, 89–95.Google Scholar
Dowdell, R. J. (1986). Environmental aspects of grassland manuring. In Grassland Manuring (ed. Cooper, J. P. and Raymond, W. F.), pp. 46–54. British Grassland Society Occasional Symposium No. 20.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1963). Densities of organisms estimated by the dilution method. In Statistical Tables (sixth edition) for Biological Agricultural and Medical Research p. 66. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. J., Dibb, C.Green, J. O., Hopkins, A. & Peel, S. (1980). Factors affecting the Productivity of Permanent Grassland. Hurley: Joint GRI-ADAS Permanent Pasture Group.Google Scholar
Herriott, J. B. D. & Wells, D. A. (1963). The grazing animal and sward productivity. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 61, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, L. J. (1970). The basis of current fertilizer recommendations. Proceedings of the Fertilizer Society, No. 118.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A., Dibb, C.Bowling, P. J., Gilbey, J., Murray, P. J. & Wilson, I. A. N. (1985). Production from permanent and reseeded grassland in England and Wales: results from a multi-site cutting trial. Grass and Forage Science 40, 245–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, M. (1984). The impact of upland pasture improvement on solute outputs in surface waters. In Agriculture and the Environment (ed. Jenkins, D.), pp. 150–154. Proceedings of the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Symposium No. 13. National Environment Research Council.Google Scholar
Jensen, H. L. (1942). Nitrogen fixation in leguminous plant. Is symbiotic N-fixation influenced by Azolobacter. Proceedings of the Linnean Society. New South Wales 67, 205–212.Google Scholar
Jones, D. I. H. (1957). Factors influencing the mineral content and nutritive value of herbage from fescue and Molinia areas. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Jones, LL. I. (1967). Studies on Hill Land in Wales. Technical Bulletin No. 2. Welsh Plant Breeding Station, 179 pp.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, J. (1953). Some aspects of the physiology of the nitrifying bacteria. In Autrotrophic Micro-organisms. 4th Symposium Society of General Microbiology, pp. 68–83.Google Scholar
Mengel, K. & Kirby, E. A. (1982). Principles of Plant Nutrition, p. 58. Bern: International Potash Institute.Google Scholar
Munro, J. M. M., Davies, D. A. & Thomas, T. A. (1973). Potential pasture production in the uplands of Wales. 3. Soil nutrient resources and limitations. Journal of the British Grassland Society 28, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, J. M. M. & Morgan, T. E. H. (1977). Lysimeter studies. Annual Report of the Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1976, pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
Newbould, P. & Floate, M. J. S. (1979). Problems of hill and upland soils. Soils and Upland Management. Welsh Soils Discussion Group, No. 20, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. (1929). Minerals in Pastures and their Relationto Animal Nutrition, 165 pp. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Reith, J. W. S. (1973). Soil conditions and nutrient supplies in hill land. In Hill Pasture Improvement and its Economic Utilisation (ed. Gething, P. A., Newbould, P. and Patterson, J. B. E.), pp. 5–17. Colloquium Proceedings No. 3. Henley-on-Thames: The Potassium Institute Ltd.Google Scholar
Selikane, R. M. O. (1971). Studies of the effect of grazing management, fertilizers and seeding on herbage yield and soil biology on hill land. Diploma in Agriculture Science, thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D. C. (1966). Nutrient Minerals in Grassland Herbage. Publication 1/1966 Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. 83 pp. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Young, N. R. & Mytton, L. R. (1983). The response of white clover to different strains of Rhizobium trifolii in hill land reseeding. Grass and Forage Science 38, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar