Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:02:52.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Live weight loss and its components in Romney ewes subjected to L-thyroxine therapy and a low plane of nutrition. Part II. Effects on some non-carcass components of live weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. H. Kirton
Affiliation:
Sheep Husbandry Department, Massey Agricultural College, Palmerston North, New Zealand
R. A. Barton
Affiliation:
Sheep Husbandry Department, Massey Agricultural College, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Extract

1. The effects of l-thyroxine therapy and a low plane of nutrition on some of the non-carcass components of live weight in New Zealand Romney ewes were investigated.

2. Thyroxine treatment significantly lowered the weight of the gastrointestinal tract contents. A low plane of nutrition and a longer total starvation immediately pre-slaughter had little effect in lowering the weight of the gastrointestinal contents. Alimentary tract ‘fill’ accounted for a group mean loss of live weight of up to 5 lb.

3. Thyroxine treatment lowered the weight of the empty gastric tract, while a low plane of nutrition reduced the weight of both the empty gastric and intestinal tracts. The combined treatment effects accounted for a loss of up to 3 lb. in the weight of the empty gastrointestinal tract.

4. Neither treatment significantly reduced the weight of the omental and mesenteric fat depots.

5. The weight of the thyroid gland was unaffected by either treatment.

6. A low plane of nutrition significantly reduced the weight of the liver, kidneys and the heart but had no effect on the weight of the spleen. Thyroxine therapy significantly reduced the weight of the liver and tended to increase the weight of the kidneys and the heart.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Johnson, V. W. & Rowland, S. J. (1952). Brit. J. Nutr. 6, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Reineke, E. P., Crampton, E. W. & Petersen, W. E. (1949). J. Anim. Sci. 8, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth, p. 174. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Frens, A. M. (1949). Landbouwk. Tijdschr. 61, 916.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. (1955). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 15th Ann. Conf., p. 57.Google Scholar
Keys, A., Brožek, J., Henschel, A., Mickelsen, O. & Taylor, H. L. (1950). The Biology of Human Starvation. Vols. 1 and 2, University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H. & Barton, R. A. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munford, R. E. & Kirton, A. H. (1958). N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 1, 83.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1946). Statistical Methods, p. 249. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Tayler, J. C., Alder, F. E. & Rudman, J. E. (1957). Nature, Lond., 179, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar