Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:53:38.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lactation pattern in Scottish Blackface and East Friesland × Scottish Blackface cross-bred ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. N. Peart
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PY, Scotland
J. M. Doney
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PY, Scotland
W. F. Smith
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PY, Scotland

Summary

Milk yield of 2-year-old Scottish Blackface and of East Friesland × Scottish Blackface ewes rearing single or twin lambs was estimated by the oxytocin method on 1 day each week up to the 14th week of lactation. Both groups of ewes had been reared from birth under good nutritional conditions. They were housed in individual pens from mid-pregnancy and offered a liberal ration of a pelleted concentrate food until parturition. Similar food was offered ad libitum during lactation.

The cross-bred ewes rearing singles or twins produced significantly more milk in the first 12 weeks (181 and 258 kg respectively) than did pure Blackface ewes in the same period (144 and 208 kg respectively). The pattern of lactation differed between breeds. Cross-bred ewes attained higher maximum yields between the second and sixth weeks (2·37 and 3·32 kg/day, respectively, for single- and twin-suckled ewes) than did the Blackface ewes (1·97 and 2·88 kg/day). The yield from the cross-breds was sustained at a higher level throughout lactation. In the third 4-week period cross-bred ewes rearing single and twin lambs produced 116 and 92%, respectively, of their yield in the first 4 weeks whilst Blackface ewes produced 87 and 65%, respectively.

In the sixth week of lactation the milk produced by the two breed groups was similar in quality (mean value of solids-not-fat 11·04% and fat 5·48%) but by the 11th week the fat percentage of milk produced by Blackface ewes had increased significantly to 7·34% whereas that of the cross-breds had remained almost unchanged.

Single-suckled ewes gained weight throughout lactation but twin-suckled ewes remained relatively constant. Lambs reared as singles by cross-bred or Blackface ewes reached a mean live weight of 36·2 and 35·0 kg at 102 days of age, respectively, compared with 33·6 and 30·1 kg for twin lambs. Food intake of all ewes increased until the fifth or sixth week of lactation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyazoglu, J. G. (1963). Aspects quantitatifs de la production laitiere des brebis. Annales de Zootechnie 12, 237296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, D. J., Corbett, J. L. & Inskip, M. W. (1972). Estimation of the energy value of ewe milk. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Animal Production 9, 286291.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M. & Peart, J. N. (1976). The effect of sustained lactation on intake of solid food and growth rate of lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 511518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, J. M., Peart, J. N. & Smith, W. F. (1979). A consideration of the techniques for estimation of milk yield by suckled sheep and a comparison of estimates obtained by two methods in relation to the effect of breed, level of production and stage of lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 123132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagusch, K. T. & Mitchell, R. M. (1971). Utilisation of the metabolisable energy of ewe's milk by the lamb. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 14. 434441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louda, F. & Doney, J. M. (1976). Persistency of lactation in the Improved Valachian breed of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 455457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, I. (1959). The determination of milir yield in the Merino ewe. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 839853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1968). Lactation studies with Blackface ewes and their lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 8794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N., Doney, J. M. & Macdonald, A. J. (1975). The influence of lamb genotype on the milk production of Blackface ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 313316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N., Edwards, R. A. & Donaldson, Elizabeth (1972). The yield and composition of the milk of Finnish Landrace × Blackface ewes. I. Ewes and lambs maintained indoors. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 303313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulton, S. G. & Ashton, W. M. (1972). Studies on ewe's milk. V. The effect of high cereal diets on ewes and on the yield of milk and milk constituents. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 203213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricordeau, G. & Flamant, J. C. (1969). Croisements entre les races ovines Prealpes du Sud et Frisonne (Ostfriesisches Milchsohaf). III. Performances laitieres. Annales de Zootechnie 18 (2), 151168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. & Gunn, R. G. (1969). Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 451454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šebela, F. (1972). Some chemical and nutritional properties of sheep's milk. Živočišná Výroba 17 (3), 243251.Google Scholar
Semjan, Š. (1962). Residual milk of sheep. XVI. International Dairy Congress 1, 1723.Google Scholar
Shalichev, Ya & Tanev, G. (1967). Comparison of milk production and milk composition of Zlatuska and East Friesland sheep and their crosses. Zhivotnov'dni Nauki 4 (4), 8189.Google Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F. & Dodd, F. H. (1965). The effect of intravenous injections of oxytocin during milking and the removal of residual milk on the composition of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Research 32, 255262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar