Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T22:10:11.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irrigation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) grown in a Mediterranean environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. Metochis
C. Metochis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The response of groundnut to different amounts of irrigation water and the effect of irrigation on the occurrence of chlorosis during the establishment period of the crop were studied in south-west Cyprus in 1984–88. The irrigation requirement of groundnut for the entire growing season was found to be 480 mm. Under-irrigation resulted in a soil water deficit and reduced production. Application of water in excess of requirement also reduced yield. Daily evapotranspiration under optimum soil moisture conditions increased from 1·5–2·0 mm at the beginning of the growing season to 7·0–7·5 mm at full crop development; it then decreased to 2·0–3·0 mm by the end of the season. In soils of low CaCO3 content, neither frequent water application nor over-irrigation during the crop establishment period caused any chlorotic symptoms or affected yield.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 121 , Issue 3 , December 1993 , pp. 343 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Black, C. R., Tang, D.-Y., Ong, C. K., Solon, A. & Simmonds, L. P. (1985). Effects of soil moisture stress on the water relations and water use of groundnut stands. New Phytologist 100, 313–328.Google Scholar
Doorenbos, J. & Kassam, A. H. (1979). Yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Doorenbos, J. & Pruitt, W. O. (1984). Crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Meteorological Service (1984). Local climates of Cyprus. Meteorological Paper 6, Nicosia.Google Scholar
Metochis, C. (1985). Pan evaporation as a guide for scheduling irrigation. In Casebook on operational assessment of areal evaporation. Operational Hydrology Report 22, WMO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Nageswara Rao, R. C., Singh, S., Sivakumar, M. V. K., Srivastava, K. L. & Williams, J. H. (1985). Effect of water deficit at different growth phases of peanut. I. Yield responses. Agronomy Journal 77, 782–786.Google Scholar
Pallas, J. E. Jr, Stansell, J. R. & Koske, T. J. (1979). Effects of drought on florunner peanuts. Agronomy Journal 71, 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, I. (1989). Effect of selected soil factors on chlorosis of peanut plants grown in calcareous soils in Cyprus. Plant and Soil 117, 291–294.Google Scholar
Papastylianou, I. (1990). Effectiveness of iron chelates and FeSO4 for correcting iron chlorosis of peanut on calcareous soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition 13, 555–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochester, E. W., Backman, P. A., McGuire, J. A., Curtis, L. M., Starling, J. & Ivey, H. (1984). Irrigation schedules for peanut production. Bulletin 556, Agricultural Experiment Station, Alabama University.Google Scholar