Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T23:43:49.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigations into the use of supplements for the control of hypomagnesaemia in dairy cows during the spring grazing period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. Line ,
M. J. Head ,
J. A. F. Rook ,
A. S. Foot  and
S. J. Rowland
C. Line
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfleld, near Reading
M. J. Head
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfleld, near Reading
J. A. F. Rook
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfleld, near Reading
A. S. Foot
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfleld, near Reading
S. J. Rowland
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfleld, near Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Three experiments are described on the feeding of supplements of calcined magnesite, linseed cake and vitamin D to dairy cows for the control of hypomagnesaemia and the prevention of hypomagnesaemic tetany on spring pastures.

2. A daily supplement of 2 oz. calcined magnesite either contained in 2 lb. of dredge corn cubes or 4 lb. dredge corn mix, or as a drench, gave adequate protection against the development of hypomagnesaemia in the fifty-six cows to which it was given.

3. The supplements of 3½–4 lb. linseed cake and 12,500 i.u. vitamin D gave only partial protection.

4. The economics of providing dairy herds with magnesite during the early grazing period is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , December 1958 , pp. 353 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allcroft, R. (1954). Vet. Rec. 66, 517.Google Scholar
Bartlett, S., Brown, B. B., Foot, A. S., Rowland, S. J., Allcroft, R. & Parr, W. H. (1954). Brit. Vet. J. 110, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S., Brown, B. B., Foot, A. S., Head, M. J., Line, C., Rook, J. A. F., Rowland, S. J. & Zundel, G. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, H. D., Spielman, A. A., Loosli, J. K., Thomas, J. W., Norton, C. L. & Turk, K. L. (1947). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1944). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 13, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seekles, L. & Boogaerdt, J. (1955). Tijdachr. Diergeneesk. 80, 331.Google Scholar
Seekles, L. & Boogaerdt, J. (1956). Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 81, 281.Google Scholar
Sjollema, B. (1951). Landbouwk. Tijdschr. 63, 615.Google Scholar