Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T14:39:23.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inter-breed ovum transfer in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. L. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Natal and School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
C. E. Adams
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Animal Reproduction, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge
L. E. Rowson
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Animal Reproduction, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge

Extract

Fertilized ova have been transferred from Border Leicester to Welsh Mountain ewes, and vice versa. The oestrous cycles of the ewes were synchronized by progesterone treatment, and donor ewes were super-ovulated with PMS. 68–90 hr. after the onset of oestrus in the donors, thirty-seven ova, representing 58% of the ovulations, were recovered in vivo from thirteen ewes. Nineteen ova were transferred to eighteen recipient ewes and a total of eight pure-bred lambs were born to ewes of the opposite breed.

Transfers resulted in pregnancy when oestrus in the recipients commenced from 16 hr. before to 20 hr. after that in the donors; two of the ova which developed to term were 4-cell, five were 8-cell and one was a 16-cell ovum at the time of transfer. Four out of seven and four out of eleven transfers, using blood serum and Ringer's solution respectively, resulted in the birth of lambs. Prior to transfer to the recipients seven of the ova which developed to term were exposed for 30–45 min. at room temperature, whilst one developed after exposure for 70 min.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C. E. (1953). In Mammalian Germ Cells, p. 198. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Asdell, S. A. (1946). Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction. New York: Comstock.Google Scholar
Austin, C. R. (1949). J. Endocrin, 6, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avis, F. R. & Sawik, P. B. (1951). J. Hered. 42, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casida, L. E., Warwick, E. J. & Meyer, R. K. (1944). J. Anim. Sci. 3, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1950). Anat. Rec. 108, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1952). J. Exp. Zool. 121, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W. W. & Winters, L. M. (1945). Tech. Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 169.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1950). Ann. Fac. Med. Montevideo, 35, 810.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. L. (1954). J. Endocrin. 10, xiii.Google Scholar
Lopyrin, A. I., Loginova, N. V. & Karpov, P. L. (1950). Sovetsk. Zooteh. 8, 50.Google Scholar
Warwick, B. L., Berry, R. O. & Horlacher, W. R. (1934). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 27th Ann. Meet., p. 225.Google Scholar
Warwick, B. L. & Berry, R. O. (1949). J. Hered. 40, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, E. L. (1953). Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. 28, 83.Google Scholar