Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:15:26.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of some seed potato production techniques on basic tuber characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. C. E. Wurr  and
A. Barnes
D. C. E. Wurr
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick
A. Barnes
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of the planting density of the seed potato crop, the date on which it was defoliated and the time at which it was lifted, on the weight, shape and number of eyes on progeny tubers in a given size grade, were small and were unlikely to be of practical importance.

Size grade was both closely and linearly related to the number of eyes on a tuber and seemed to be a perfectly adequate practical method of grading seed tubers according to their number of eyes.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , October 1977 , pp. 285 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bleasdale, J. K. A. (1965). Relationships between set characters and yield in maincrop potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 361–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, E. (1966). Effect of soil temperature at different growth stages on growth and development of potato plants. Agronomy Journal 58, 169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, D. (1973). Some effects of seed source on early growth in Maris Peer potatoes. Annals of Applied Biology 75, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, J. B. (1973). Effects on growth and yield of date of lifting, way of handling, and diseases during storage, of seed potatoes. Proceedings of the Fifth Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, 1972, p. 114.Google Scholar
Kozlowska, A. (1960). Effects of environment on tuber production, potassium absorption, and susceptibility of potatoes to virus disease in Poland. American Potato Journal 37, 366–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, H. (1925). The effect of environmental conditions on the potato tuber (translated title). Journal für Landwirtschaft 73, 7–38, abstracted in Experiment Station Record (1926) 54, 638–9.Google Scholar
Prytherch, E. I. (1975). The effect of practices in seed potato production on the rate of bulking in the early ware crop. Experimental Husbandry 29, 13–22.Google Scholar
Svensson, B. (1966). Seed tuber – stand – yield. Properties and relationships. Växtodling 21, 1–86.Google Scholar
Walker, M. G. (1968). The effects of nutrient treatments of potato plants on the performance of their progeny. Ph. D. Thesis, Bath University of Technology.Google Scholar
Wöhrmann, K. (1966). Über den Einfluss von Umweltfaktoren auf Eigenschaften der Kartoffelknolle. Züchter 36, 90–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar