Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T19:37:54.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of size of animal and stocking rate on the herbage intake and grazing behaviour of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. L. F. Zoby  and
W. Holmes
J. L. F. Zoby
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twenty-four Friesian cattle classed as large, medium or small and from 776 to 163 kg initial live weight (LW) were grazed over two successive 8-week periods. Two stocking rates were imposed and there were four replicates. Trios of animals, including one of each size, grazed in each paddock. Cattle changed stocking rate in mid-season. Herbage intake, live-weight gain and grazing behaviour were recorded.

The stocking rates resulted in large differences in herbage allowance and consequent differences in intake, live-weight gain and grazing behaviour. The large cattle were least able to compensate for the higher stocking rate by increasing grazing time or frequency of biting. Average herbage organic-matter (OM) intakes ranged from 13 g OM/kg LW for large animals to 28 g OM/kg LW for the small animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 139 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal.Google Scholar
Allden, W. G. & Whittaker, A. M. (1970). The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: the inter-relationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, G. W. & Dudzinski, M. L. (1966). The behavioural rosponses controlling the food intake of grazing sheep. In Proceedings 10th International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 367–370.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. (1976). A simple disc instrument for estimating herbage yield. Journal of the British Grassland Society 30, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (1961). Research techniques in use at the Grassland Research Institute. Bulletin 45, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal.Google Scholar
Curran, M. K., Leaver, J. D. & Weston, E. W. (1967). A note on the use of chromic oxide incorporated in a feed to estimate faecal output in ruminants. Animal Production 9, 561–564.Google Scholar
Ernst, P., Le Du, Y. L. P. & Carlier, L. (1980). Animal and sward production under rotational and continuous grazing management–a critical appraisal. In The Role of Nitrogen in Intensive Grassland Production (ed. Prins, W. H. and Arnold, G. H.), pp. 119–127. Wageningen, Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. & Jamieson, W. (1981). Variations in herbage mass and digestibility, and the grazing behaviour and herbage intake of adult cattle and weaned calves. Grass and Forage Science 36, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. & Milne, J. A. (1978). The influence of weight of herbage per unit area and per animal upon the grazing behaviour of sheep. Proceedings of the European Grassland Federation, Ghent, 1978, pp. 4.31–4.38.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. & Wilkinson, J. M. (1967). The relationship between live weight and herbage intake in grazing cattle. Animal Production 9, 365–376.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. (1980). Grazing management. In Grass, its Production and Utilization (ed. Holmes, W.), ch. 4. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W. & Drake-Brockman, R. M. (1961). The feed intake of grazing cattle. 2. The influence of size of animal on feed intake. Animal Production 3, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, A. E. M. & Baillie, J. H. (1973). A new grazing system for beef cattle – the two-field system. Journal of the British Grassland Society 28, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, W. & Hodgson, J. (1979). The effect of daily herbage allowance and sward characteristics upon the ingestive behaviour and herbage intake of calves under strip-grazing management. Grass and Forage Science 34, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L. & McDonald, I. (1963). The indirect estimation of the digestibility of pasture herbage. 3. Regressions of digestibility on faecal nitrogen concentration: effects of species and individuality of animal and of method of determining digestibility upon the relationships. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 61, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Du, Y. L. P. & Baker, R. D. (1981). The digestibility of herbage selected by oesophageally fistulated cows, steer calves and wether sheep when strip grazing together. Grass and Forage Science 36, 237–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieson, J. & Davidson, J. (1970). The automated estimation of chromic oxide. Proceedings of Nutrition Society 29, 30A–31A.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1973). The Analysis of Agricultural Materials. Technical Bulletin no. 27. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin no. 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Mitcheson, R. C. (1969). Determination of nitrogen in malt and barley using the technicon autoanalyser. Technicon Symposium, no. 40.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. E. & Barber, W. P. (1979). The adviser's approach to predicting the metabolizable energy value of feeds for ruminants. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 93–106. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Stobbs, T. H. (1970). Automatic measurement of grazing time by dairy cows on tropical grass and legume pastures. Tropical Grassland 4, 237–244.Google Scholar
Wanyoike, M. M. & Holmes, W. (1981 a). A comparison of indirect methods of estimating feed intake on pasture. Grass and Forage Science 36, 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanyoike, M. M. & Holmes, W. (1981 b). The effects of winter nutrition on the subsequent live-weight performance and intake of herbage by beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoby, J. L. F. (1981). Factors affecting herbage intake and grazing behaviour in cattle. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar