Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T17:56:18.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of plant residues on nitrogen fixation and on losses of nitrate in the soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Henry Brougham Hutchinson
Henry Brougham Hutchinson
Affiliation:
(Rothamsted Experimental Station.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The foregoing experiments give definite evidence, corroborative of the work of Koch, Remy and others, that the nitrogen content of sand or soil may be appreciably increased by the activity of Azotobacter when some suitable source of energy is supplied. For this purpose sugars such as dextrose and saccharose are suitable, but distinct gains have also been obtained by the use of plant residues. In laboratory experiments an increment of upwards of 6 mgrm. of nitrogen per gram of plant residues occurred, but in pot experiments gains of 9 mgrm. per gram of substance were obtained.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , August 1918 , pp. 92 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Hall, A. D.Journ. Agric. Science, 1905,1, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Ashby, S. F.Journ. Agric. Science. 1907, 2, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Henry, E.Journ. agric. prat. 1897, 411–485; Ann. science agron. 1903, 8, 313.Google Scholar
(4)Hornberger, R.Zeitsch. Forst und Jagd Wesen, 1905, 37, 71; 1906, pt 12; abst. in Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1907, 19, 340.Google Scholar
(5)Winogradsky, M. S.Compt. rend. 1893,114, 1385; Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1902, 9, 43 and 107.Google Scholar
(6)Beijerinck, M. W.Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1901,7, 561–582; and Delden, A. Van, Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1902, 9, 3–43.Google Scholar
(7)Freudenreich, E.Von Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1903, 10, 514.Google Scholar
(8)Gerlach, M. and Vogel, J.Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1902, 8, 669; 1902, 9, 817; 1903, 10, 636.Google Scholar
(9)Remy, Th.Landw. Jahrb. 1906, 35, Erg. Bd. 4, 1–63.Google Scholar
(10)Lofnis, F.Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1905, 14, 582; 1907, 19, 87; 1908, 20, 781; 1909, 22, 234.Google Scholar
(11)Heinze, B.Landw. Jahrb. 1906, 35, 889–910.Google Scholar
(12)Lipman, J. G.Rep. New Jersey Agr. Exp. Stat. 1904, et seq.Google Scholar
(13)Haselhoff, E. and Bredemann, G.Landw. Jahrb. 1906, 35, 381–414.Google Scholar
(14)Warmbold, H.Landw. Jahrb. 1906, 35, 1–123.Google Scholar
(15)Stoklasa, J.Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1907,18, 262.Google Scholar
(16)Schneider, P.Landw. Jahrb. 1906, 35, Erg. Bd. 4, 63–83.Google Scholar
(17)Koch, A., Litzendorf, J., Krull, F. and Alves, A.Journ. f. Landw. 1907, 55, 355–416.Google Scholar
(18)Remy, Th.Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1909, 22, 561–651.Google Scholar
(19)Ebbels, W. P.Agric. News, West Indies, 1908, 7, 227; 1910, 9, 339.Google Scholar
(20)Boname, P.Rap. Ann. Stat. Agron. Mauritius, 1908, Bul. 20, 21–24.Google Scholar
(21)Imp. Dep. Agr. West Indies, 1908–1909, Pt 2, Manurial Exp. with Sugar Cane in the Leeward Islands, Appendix 1, 20.Google Scholar
(22)Archief voor de Java Suiker Industrie, 1903 and 1910.Google Scholar
(23)Harrison, J. B. and Ward, R.Journ. Bd. Agr. British Guiana, 1913, 6, 123.Google Scholar
(24)Hiltner, L.Mitt. Kais. biolog. Anstalt f. Land- und, Forstwirtsch. 1906, 5, 99.Google Scholar
(25)Seelhorst, C.Von. Journ. f. Landw. 1906, 54, 283.Google Scholar
(26)StÜtzer, A.Journ. f. Landw.. 1907, 55, 81–91.Google Scholar
(27)Bartels, A.Journ. f. Landw. 1910, 58, 143.Google Scholar
(28)Peck, S. S.Hawaiian Sugar Planters Stat. 1910, Bul. 34, 27.Google Scholar
(29)Christensen, H. R.Cent. Bakt. Par. ii, 1907, 17, 109; 1907, 19, 735.Google Scholar
(30)Hutchinson, H. B. and Marr, F. S.Proc. Intern. Cong. App. Chem., London, 1909, Sect. 7, 37.Google Scholar
(31)Wagner, P.Deut. Landw. Presse, 1895, 92.Google Scholar
(32)Maercker, M.Jahresb. Agric. Chem. Vers. Stat. Halle, 2, 51 and 78.Google Scholar
(33)Warington, R.Journ. Roy. Agr. Soc. Series 3, 1897, 8, 577–607.Google Scholar