Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:36:21.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increasing profitability and water use efficiency of triple rice crop production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2015

P. P. NHẪN
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Plant Physiology, College of Agriculture and Applied Biology, Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam
L. V. HÒA
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Plant Physiology, College of Agriculture and Applied Biology, Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam
C. N. QUÍ
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, An Giang University, Long Xuyen, Vietnam
N. X. HUY
Affiliation:
Tri Ton station for Agricultural Extension, Tri Ton, Vietnam
T. P. HỮU
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Plant Physiology, College of Agriculture and Applied Biology, Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam
B. C. T MACDONALD*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Agricultural Flagship, Black Mountain Canberra, Australia
T. P. TƯỜNG
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]

Summary

Rice production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam is threatened by future water scarcity caused by changing rainfall patterns and increasing irrigation costs. To improve resilience of the triple rice farming system to future climate-related stresses, profitability needs to be increased through water use efficiency, fertilizer management and planting methods.

During four cropping seasons in 2011–13, alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation was applied in the triple rice production area within An Giang Province, Vietnam. An issue with the application of AWD is the prevalence of acid sulphate soils in the Mekong Delta. Three types of irrigation management were tested; continuously flooded (CF) where the water in the paddy was maintained at 5 cm; AWD where the water level was allowed to fall to 15 cm below the ground surface, at which point the field was irrigated until the water level was at 1 cm above the ground surface (designated −15 cm); AWD where the water level was allowed to fall to 30 cm below the ground surface before irrigation until the water level was at 1 cm above the ground surface (designated −30 cm). Two further experiments were also undertaken which examined the planting method (transplant v. direct sowing) and phosphorus rate on rice yield. There was no effect on yield caused by P fertilizer rate and irrigation management in any year, and there was no significant effect on soil pH or salinity caused by irrigation management. Overall net profitability was greatest for the AWD treatments because of the reduction in pumping and labour costs in the dry season. Transplanted rice improved yields, but the labour cost reduced overall profitability. The study shows that AWD (−15 cm) can be safely applied in acid sulphate soil areas within the triple rice areas of An Giang Mekong Delta and saved at least 0·27 of total irrigated water quantity used during three of the six cropping seasons. The increased profitability of the AWD rice production system will help to improve the resilience of triple rice cropping systems to future water scarcity.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bouman, B. A. M., Peng, S., Castaneda, A. R. & Visperas, R. M. (2005). Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agricultural Water Management 74, 87105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, B. A. M., Humphreys, E., Tuong, T. P. & Barker, R. (2007). Rice and water. Advances in Agronomy 92, 187237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, R. H. & Kurtz, L. H. (1945). Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59, 3946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, N. N. (2008). Rice Culture. Can Tho City, Vietnam: Mekong Delta Development Research Institute, Can Tho University Publisher.Google Scholar
Grierson, C. S., Barnes, S. R., Chase, M. W., Clarke, M., Grierson, D., Edwards, K. J., Jellis, G. J., Jones, D. J., Knapp, S., Oldroyd, G., Poppy, G., Temple, P., Williams, R. & Bastow, R. (2011). One hundred important questions facing plant science research. New Phytologist 192, 612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerra, L. C., Bhuiyan, S. I., Tuong, T. P. & Barker, R. (1998). Producing More Rice with Less Water from Irrigated System. SWIM Paper 5. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI/IRRI.Google Scholar
Kirby, M. & Mainuddin, M. (2009). Water and agricultural productivity in the Lower Mekong Basin, trends and future prospects. Water International 34, 134143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, B. C. T., Smith, J., Keene, A. F., Tunks, M., Kinsela, A. & White, I. (2004). Impacts of runoff from sulfuric soils on sediment chemistry in an estuarine lake. Science of the Total Environment 329, 115130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minh, L. Q., Tuong, T. P. & Xuan, V. T. (1995). Leaching of acid sulfate soils and its environmental hazard in the Mekong River Delta. In Vietnam and IRRI: A Partnership in Rice Research (Eds Denning, G. L. & Xuan, V. T.), pp. 99110. Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI and Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry Vietnam.Google Scholar
Pierzynski, G. M. (2000). Methods of Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals, and Waters. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 396. Raleigh, NC, USA: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Quang, V. D., Thai, V. C., Linh, T. T. T. & Dufey, J. E. (1996). Phosphorus sorption in soils of the Mekong Delta (Vietnam) as described by the binary Langmuir equation. European Journal of Soil Science 47, 113123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quang, V. D. & Dufey, J. E. (1997). Phosphate desorption from flooded and reoxidized soils as compared with adsorption characteristics. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 28, 885898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, P. A., Dobos, S. K., Cook, F. J. & Goonetilleke, A. (2006). Role of organic matter in framboidal pyrite oxidation. Science of the Total Environment 367, 847854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sammut, J., White, I. & Melville, M. D. (1996). Acidification of an estuarine tributary in eastern Australia due to drainage of acid sulfate soils. Marine and Freshwater Research 47, 669684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A., Chadwick, O. A., Rancourt, D. G. & Chorover, J. (2006). Iron-oxide crystallinity increases during soil redox oscillations. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70, 17101727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuong, T. P., Marquez, J. A., Kropff, M. J. & Wopereis, M. C. S. (1994). Mechanisms and control of percolation losses in irrigated puddled rice fields. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 17941803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuong, T. P., Bouman, B. A. M. & Lampayan, R. (2009). A simple tool to effectively implement water saving alternate wetting and drying irrigation for rice. ICID Newsletter 2009/4, 5. Available from: http://www.icid.org/nl2009_4.pdf (verified 28 August 2015).Google Scholar
Vance, C. P., Uhde-Stone, C. & Allan, D. L. (2003). Phosphorus acquisition and use, critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytologist 157, 423447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassmann, R., Jagadish, S. V. K., Sumfleth, K., Pathak, H., Howell, G., Ismail, A., Serraj, R., Redona, E., Singh, R. K. & Heuer, S. (2009). Regional vulnerability of climate change impacts on Asian rice production and scope for adaptation. Advances in Agronomy 102, 91133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. P., White, I. & Melville, M. D. (1999). Floodplain hydrology, acid discharge and change in water quality associated with a drained acid sulfate soil. Marine and Freshwater Research 50, 149157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar