Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:09:02.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro digestibility, breakdown when eaten and physical structure of stovers and straws compared with lucerne hay and sweet potato haulm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

D. WILMAN
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3AL, UK
YILUN JI
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi 030801, China
E. J. MTENGETI
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3AL, UK
NAZIR AHMAD
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3AL, UK

Abstract

In order to learn more about the digestibility, breakdown when eaten and physical structure of stovers and straws, seven diets were compared in one experiment and eight in another. The diets in the first experiment were: the upper and lower parts of lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay, the leaves, upper stem and lower stem of maize (Zea mays) stover and the leaves and stem of sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) stover. The diets in the second experiment were: the upper and lower parts of lucerne hay, the leaves, stems and whole stover of millet (Setaria italica), wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw, rice (Oryza sativa) straw and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) haulm. The diets were examined for in vitro digestibility in three forms: milled, chopped (1 cm lengths) and chewed (by cattle). The lengths and widths of the chewed particles were recorded in both experiments. Aspects of the morphology and vascular structure of plant parts of the diets and of chewed particles were recorded in the second experiment.

The in vitro digestibility of chopped or chewed plant material was lower (by 11 and 12 percentage units, respectively, on average) than that of milled material. The difference between chewed and milled material in in vitro digestibility was smaller with leaves (5 percentage units, on average) than with stems (18 percentage units, on average) in maize, sorghum and millet. Digestibility of chewed material was similar to or lower than that of chopped material, except with the leaves of maize, sorghum and millet. Millet stover had higher in vitro digestibility than wheat straw or rice straw, whether the diet was milled, chopped or chewed.

The thinnest stem internode vascular bundles recorded (0·14 mm) were in wheat. The percentage of stem internode cross-sectional area occupied by vascular bundles was in the range 6–8 for lucerne, millet, wheat and rice. The mean numbers of veins or vascular bundles per chewed particle were in the range 6–23. The mean length of the chewed particles varied from 10 mm with the upper stem of maize to 18 mm with sorghum stem and maize leaves. The mean width of the chewed particles varied from 1·8 mm with rice straw to 5·4 mm with maize leaves.

It is suggested that the low digestibility of mature plant tissue such as stovers and straws is not particularly due to thick vascular strands or to a high proportion of vascular tissue, but rather to a high proportion of cell wall and incomplete and delayed access by rumen microorganisms to much of the cell wall.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)